I think you owe Criterion's interns an apology.Antoine Doinel wrote:Ugh, is there an intern designing this thing? Instead of revising, they need to start this over from scratch.
Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.4
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
I believe this story originated with a poster on IMDB who said he interviewed Wes Anderson during one of the press junkets for DL and brought up the question about an eventual criterion release.mfunk9786 wrote:Would that be a year from theatrical release, or a year from DVD release? While DVD release would make more sense as far as that type of rights issue goes, it would certainly also make a lot of sense to release Bottle Rocket and Darjeeling on the same day... and if that day falls near the end of October, it would align with the time frame in which the film came out in theaters last year.
Apparently Wes had told him that it would eventually be a two-disc Criterion set but that Fox was going to put out their own edition first and get exclusive marketshare for a year. (Which makes sense, it allows them to try and recoup as much money from the film as possible, plus also get the extra cash from the licensing fee to criterion and any additional royalties, assuming any of this is true.)
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
I quite like their retro vibe. I'm sure people will moan they look like amateur copy & paste jobs, but you have to take them in context -- those blatant cut-outs are a throwback to the simple collages often found on posters in the 60s.domino harvey wrote:Those Melville covers are the most disgusting things ever to come from this label.
He says it every month.rwaits wrote:Think I've heard you say that a time or two in the past...domino harvey wrote:Those Melville covers are the most disgusting things ever to come from this label.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- LQ
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am
- Contact:
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
- Jean-Luc Garbo
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
- Contact:
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
I have most of Carver's stuff anyway. I may hock the old set just to get rid of that horrible digipak. Did anyone else have issues with the book fitting?
The two Melville's are nice. Neither are surprises, but the covers are definitely trying to aim at the Tarantino fans who know there are cool foreign films but never knew where to begin. Plus the gun as the "L" is a nice little touch for those who love Sopranos and don't take risks when it comes to judging movies by their cover.
I'm surprised they aren't also throwing Faces into the Cassavetes mix. Maybe they just wanted to go with the film with the coolest and longest titles?
Missing is nice. Great movie -- all thanks to Jack Lemmon. Nice for them to include him on the cover.
The two Melville's are nice. Neither are surprises, but the covers are definitely trying to aim at the Tarantino fans who know there are cool foreign films but never knew where to begin. Plus the gun as the "L" is a nice little touch for those who love Sopranos and don't take risks when it comes to judging movies by their cover.
I'm surprised they aren't also throwing Faces into the Cassavetes mix. Maybe they just wanted to go with the film with the coolest and longest titles?
Missing is nice. Great movie -- all thanks to Jack Lemmon. Nice for them to include him on the cover.





