447-448 Le doulos and Le deuxieme souffle

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
hangthadj
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:40 am
Contact:

447-448 Le doulos and Le deuxieme souffle

#1 Post by hangthadj » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:41 am

Le doulos

[img]http://criterion_production.s3.amazonaws.com/release_images/1037/447_box_348x490_w100.jpg[/img]

The backstabbing criminals in the shadowy underworld of Jean-Pierre Melville's Le doulos have only one guiding principle: “Lie or die.” A stone-faced Jean-Paul Belmondo stars as enigmatic gangster Silien, who may or may not be responsible for squealing on Faugel (Serge Reggiani), just released from the slammer and already involved in what should have been a simple heist. By the end of this brutal, twisty, and multilayered policier, who will be left to trust? Shot and edited with Melville’s trademark cool and featuring masterfully stylized dialogue and performances, Le doulos (slang for an informant) is one of the filmmaker’s most gripping crime dramas.

Special Features

• New, restored high-definition digital transfer
• Selected-scene audio commentary by film scholar Ginette Vincendeau, author of Jean-Pierre Melville: An American in Paris
• Video interviews with directors Volker Schlöndorff and Bertrand Tavernier, who served as assistant director and publicity agent, respectively, on the film
• Archival interviews with Melville and actors Jean-Paul Belmondo and Serge Reggiani
• Original theatrical trailer
• New and improved subtitle translation
• PLUS: A new essay by film critic Glenn Kenny

Criterionforum.org user rating averages

Feature currently disabled

Le deuxieme souffle

[img]http://criterion_production.s3.amazonaws.com/release_images/1040/448_box_348x490_w100.jpg[/img]

With his customary restraint and ruthless attention to detail, director Jean-Pierre Melville follows the parallel tracks of French underworld criminal Gu (the inimitable Lino Ventura), escaped from prison and roped into one last robbery, and the suave inspector, Blot (Paul Meurisse), relentlessly seeking him. The implosive Le deuxième souffle captures the pathos, loneliness, and excitement of a life in the shadows with methodical suspense and harrowing authenticity, and contains one of the most thrilling heist sequences Melville ever shot.

Special Features

• New, restored high-definition digital transfer
• Selected-scene audio commentary by film scholar Ginette Vincendeau, author of Jean-Pierre Melville: An American in Paris , and film critic Geoff Andrew of the British Film Institute
• New video interview with director Bertrand Tavernier, who served as publicity agent on the film
• Archival footage featuring interviews with Melville and Lino Ventura
• Original theatrical trailer
• New and improved subtitle translation
• PLUS: A new essay by film critic Adrian Danks

Criterionforum.org user rating averages

Feature currently disabled

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

#2 Post by Matt » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:47 am

hangthadj wrote:Looks like I will be heading down to Film Forum Monday night to see Melville's Le Dolous.

I was wondering if anyone else has had a chance to see it yet and if there were any thoughts...
I haven't seen the Rialto print, but I've seen the film (on the BFI disc). It's great, an early example of the prototypical Melville gangster film. Belmondo is a more of a happy-go-lucky doomed gangster than Delon's typically morose kind.

User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 am
Location: London

#3 Post by Awesome Welles » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:09 am

I found Le Doulos to be very different from Melville's other films (that I have seen) this film is much more playful in terms of the twisting narrative he delivers and whilst Melville's characters are more often doomed loners like Bob (le Flambeur) or Jef (Le Samourai) the tone here is different somehow, the characters seem to be loners as a cause of their work but they don't want to be at all, all they seem to really long for is safety and friendship, rather than the inherent lonerism that characterises Melville's other characters mentioned who are loners because that's the way they like it.

What took me surprise is that Belmondo plays a much more different character than I had expected and Serge Raggiani is really the central character (to a point) and I thought that what Melville was really doing here was making a Western, something he would have loved to do but could never, obviously, transpose to France.

Certainly an excellent film, like all of Melville's work I have seen and a nice script (which Tarantino has said is the best script ever written, read into that what you will).

User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:03 pm

#4 Post by Via_Chicago » Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:46 am

Some interesting thoughts. I especially liked your reading of the film as a Western, which may not be that far off.

Le Doulos is an interesting film that seems to mark the bridge between Bob Le Flambeur and Le Deuxieme Souffle, two markedly different gangster films. It is filled with a kind of comraderie and sly humor that you'd find in Bob, yet it also has that distinct fatalism so common in Melville's later films (all of them in fact). A well-crafted picture (with a nine minute long-take interrogation scene!) with some marvelous performances from Reggiani and Belmondo, plus one hell of an opening scene (gotta love that train!). Oh, it also features one of the greatest slaps in cinema history.

User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 am
Location: London

#5 Post by Awesome Welles » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:08 am

I had wondered about the playfulness in Melville's gangster films, having only seen Bob and Le Doulos from his pre Le Samourai period (after which all the films are much darker). It seems very true that Le Doulos is a sort of bridge in the evolution of his oeuvre. I can only hope that the unavailable lot are made available soon!

User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:03 pm

#6 Post by Via_Chicago » Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:04 pm

FSimeoni wrote:I had wondered about the playfulness in Melville's gangster films, having only seen Bob and Le Doulos from his pre Le Samourai period (after which all the films are much darker). It seems very true that Le Doulos is a sort of bridge in the evolution of his oeuvre. I can only hope that the unavailable lot are made available soon!
Le Deuxieme Souffle is totally different. There is absolutely no playfulness, camraderie, or humor. It's all about method, psychology, and fatalism. There is definitely fatalism in Bob but you don't really see that "Mevillian gangster fatalism" until Le Doulos.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#7 Post by domino harvey » Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:28 pm

I think the abuse scene in Le Doulos is needlessly harsh towards the woman involved. I mean did Melville really need to go as far as he did? The film is disorienting and strangely empty in substance and tone, and behind Les Enfants is my least-favorite Melville. Of course my favorite Melville is Un Flic so my tastes probably already run counter to most.

User avatar
Person
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm

#8 Post by Person » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:23 pm

Eyes peeled for one of the most impressive long takes (8 minutes) in an interior scene in all of Cinema in this film. Up there with the Nazi office scene in John Frankenheimer's, The Train.

hangthadj
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:40 am
Contact:

#9 Post by hangthadj » Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:12 pm

So, I did see this Monday at Film Forum.
Person wrote:Eyes peeled for one of the most impressive long takes (8 minutes) in an interior scene in all of Cinema in this film. Up there with the Nazi office scene in John Frankenheimer's, The Train.
That really was an impressive scene.

The whole film was really extremely enjoyable. It's definitely worth catch

I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole Le Doulous as a Western idea and was hoping that maybe FSimeoni could go further with his thoughts on that.

User avatar
Don Lope de Aguirre
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: London

#10 Post by Don Lope de Aguirre » Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:46 pm

Oh, it also features one of the greatest slaps in cinema history.
I think the abuse scene in Le Doulos is needlessly harsh towards the woman involved. I mean did Melville really need to go as far as he did?
:lol: When I saw this for the first time in the cinema I burst out laughing (not sure if from shock or a 'amusement' or both...)
It's interesting that whenever people 'debate' Melville's supposed mysogyny this is the scene that always springs to mind. You can really sense the unadulterated zeal in those slaps and the sadistic joy when he pours the alcohol over her head.

Oh, and I ought to add that this film contains my favourite line in film: 'I wasted a raincoat on her, almost new'.

User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 am
Location: London

#11 Post by Awesome Welles » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:12 am

hangthadj wrote:I'm trying to wrap my head around the whole Le Doulous as a Western idea and was hoping that maybe FSimeoni could go further with his thoughts on that.
I know that Melville loved Westerns and always wanted to make one but obviously couldn't transpose the American west to France, but I think in the case of Le Doulos, it seems, to me, that Melville was telling a story here that was very similar to a Western in terms of the character's fatalism and structuring of the story, I think bizarrely it actually came out feeling rather like the latter westerns that would appear some seven years later, such as The Wild Bunch, and even something like Bring Me The Head of Alfredo Garcia seems like an interesting piece alongside Le Doulos . I think that Melville, actually, probably had a great love for Westerns of the Golden Era and that maybe people like Peckinpah were more influenced by him rather than Ford or Hawks?

The opening shots of Le Doulos are undeniably a crime movie, the only way I can see this being comparable to a Western is this somehow feels like our hero, Maurice, is coming back from somewhere (a dark past) to the town, which is a common opening to westerns I feel. But I think that once we come to know the characters and their movements, for me, it really starts to feel like a Western.

I think also the prominent presence of the police captain, in a lot of crime films this the archetypal character is either limited to a very small role (Le Samourai) or another possibility entirely in which the police captain/law official is the main character (Un Flic). I think the relationships we see between the characters in Le Doulos is very reminiscent of the western where you have this conflict between a group of outsiders, all clamouring for that escape with the loot to a quiet life and the police captain another of these characters very similar is his ethos but on the right side of the law. By the end of Le Doulos this escape to the homestead becomes evident in Silien's near achievement of this goal, but as with any western their fatalism overtakes them and we all know the ending.

I guess a lot of films could be manipulated to look like another genre in an analysis but this is the way I saw the film personally and certainly won't apply to everyone.

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

#12 Post by cdnchris » Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:51 pm

Just announced, updated initial post with DVD specs.

User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Atlanta-ish

#13 Post by jbeall » Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:55 pm

Hmmm... they're both at the $40 price point. I'll probably pick up at least one, as I'm definitely a crime/heist movie fan. Which one's better?

User avatar
Cabiria21
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:10 pm

#14 Post by Cabiria21 » Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:56 pm

jbeall wrote:Hmmm... they're both at the $40 price point. I'll probably pick up at least one, as I'm definitely a crime/heist movie fan. Which one's better?
I prefer Le Doulos but I'm a Belmondo fanatic.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#15 Post by Antoine Doinel » Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:23 pm

Finally, I get to see how Le Doulous ends! I rented a VHS of this film many years ago but for some reason the ending was cut off. More Melville is fine by me.

User avatar
justeleblanc
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut

#16 Post by justeleblanc » Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:45 pm

I kind of prefer later Melville, when he was dripping with aesthetic, so I prefer Second Breath. However, Belmondo is awesome in Doulos. His two other films with Melville aren't as good as Doulos.

User avatar
pro-bassoonist
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:26 am

#17 Post by pro-bassoonist » Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:51 am

davidhare wrote:For anyone like me who is holding off virtually evey new Criterion purchase because of possible future Blurays, the Russian DVD of Deuxieme Souffle (which the lamented Tony and xploited had on sale for 20 bucks) is an excellent Disc as a stayer until Blu time. I just dunno now where you can get these ex-xploited titles?
I am sorry to have to disagree. The Russian disc by Film Prestige, which I own, is a direct PAL-NTSC port of the Rene Chateau disc with added English subs. There is a heavy dose of "ghosting" and a sea of macroblocking issues to consider. (Unlike Film Prestige's direct PAL to PAL port of En Cas de Malheur which was a perfect copy of the Chateau disc the one above is atrocious).

I would certainly recommend that people stay away from it.

Pro-B

User avatar
Cinephrenic
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:58 pm
Location: Paris, Texas

#18 Post by Cinephrenic » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:43 am

Any one else surprised that they released Second Breath in its original French title, especially when we got The Fire Within or The Lovers instead of the beautiful Le Fou follet or Les Amants. I always thought these were better commonly known vice versa.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

#19 Post by domino harvey » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:50 am

I'm sure it's because no one's ever seriously called Le Doulos anything but, and they intended to pair both films-- it would look silly to have two paired films but one title translated and the other not. Of course, based on the cover art, they probably weren't that worried about looking silly.

User avatar
pro-bassoonist
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:26 am

#20 Post by pro-bassoonist » Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:51 am

Cinephrenic wrote:Any one else surprised that they released Second Breath in its original French title, especially when we got The Fire Within or The Lovers instead of the beautiful Le Fou follet or Les Amants. I always thought these were better commonly known vice versa.
Not surprised at all. The remake of Second Breath in France with Bellucci and Auteuil is probably as good of an excuse as you could come up with (though the US premiere is still not on the horizon). Posters and promos have been everywhere....even on the net. :)
davidhare wrote:I see your point, but in playback on my setup there are no ghosting issues. And some but not excessive macroblocking. And although I was expecting some variation in color timing/white level temp it seems to be by and large consistent. In any case I assume Criterion's version will also be from Rene Chateau, but with a superior systems corrected transfer. We really need it in HD however. And until the Crit at least this was acceptable. Certainly it's a major late Melville. All of these need Blu releases, and most should be ready for them.
Perhaps it is less apparent on your set then but I have a large SONY Bravia XBR4 and the "ghosting" is utterly distracting, in fact to the point of making it unwatchable (the pivotal scene at the beach with cops for example).
davidhare wrote:Completely UNLIKE the new R2 disc of Identificazione di una Donna which pulsates and quavers in color/visual quality in completely vomitous fashion. .
Thanks, I will avoid it.

Pro-B
Last edited by pro-bassoonist on Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 am
Location: London

#21 Post by Awesome Welles » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:47 am

I emailed Tamara about Le Deuxiemme Souffle a couple of weeks ago - now I know why I didn't get a reply! This is great news and will definitely buy straight away. Glad to see more Vincendeau and will interested to hear Geoff Andrew's thoughts.

User avatar
Sloper
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:06 pm

#22 Post by Sloper » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:47 am

I wonder if the scene-specific commentary from Vincendeau on Le Doulos will be the same as on the BFI disc... If so there may not be much to choose between the two editions.

To go back to the old, but undeveloped, discussion, I'd second (or third?) the DHs' comments on Le Doulos's misogyny. I loved the film until that 'wasted a raincoat' flashback, which just gave the whole thing a really sour taste. Most of the misogyny in films like this doesn't really bother me, I guess because femmes fatales are usually a bit more developed. But there was a really unpleasant undertone of sexual violence to the radiator scene in Le Doulos, which in turn gave the ensuing male camaraderie a kind of obnoxious locker-room atmosphere.

I found this to be the only Melville film where his attitude to women actually hampered the story. And given Tarantino's neanderthal treatment of female characters in his films, it isn't too surprising that this is his favourite script.

Still, a brilliant film in every other way, and I can't wait for Le Deuxieme Souffle...

User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:03 pm

#23 Post by Via_Chicago » Wed Jul 16, 2008 1:31 pm

domino harvey wrote:I'm sure it's because no one's ever seriously called Le Doulos anything but, and they intended to pair both films-- it would look silly to have two paired films but one title translated and the other not. Of course, based on the cover art, they probably weren't that worried about looking silly.
Well Le Doulos was never called anything but because it's notoriously difficult to translate into English. The most common translation I've seen is "The Fingerman," which doesn't exactly evoke images of gangsters and murder. But then, Melville's titles have always suffered in America - witness Le Samourai becoming The Godson! #-o

I'm extremely surprised to see Le Deuxieme Souffle though, considering I'd heard absolutely no rumblings about its imminent release. I'm quite excited to get the chance to reevaluate the film since I first saw it on a terrible VHS dupe.

jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

#24 Post by jaredsap » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:02 pm

Sloper wrote:I found this to be the only Melville film where his attitude to women actually hampered the story. And given Tarantino's neanderthal treatment of female characters in his films, it isn't too surprising that this is his favourite script.
Huh? Tarantino can be taken to task for many things, but neanderthal (and misogynist) treatment of women is certainly not one of them. He's created some of the strongest female characters in the history of American mainstream cinema. This is the guy who made JACKIE BROWN, KILL BILL and DEATH PROOF. Your comparison to Melville in this context is nonsensical imo.

User avatar
Sloper
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:06 pm

#25 Post by Sloper » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:33 pm

Tarantino has created some of the strongest female characters in the history of American mainstream cinema.
We'll have to agree to differ on that one - I don't remember Jackie Brown that well and that wasn't Tarantino's character (but fair enough, she was more or less three-dimensional) but the Bride in Kill Bill struck me as an immature male nerd's fantasy. Haven't seen Death Proof, but judging from the posters and reviews it doesn't exactly seem to be pitching itself to a female audience...

I really think that Melville and Tarantino are both very good at exploring the ways in which men interact with each other, but are (as a rule) all at sea when it comes to women. I feel the same about Scorsese, despite Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, Age of Innocence and so on. These are directors who are most at home describing a certain kind of milieu, and it happens to be one in which women are nearly always peripheral, superfluous, or a nuisance. Most directors who have a speciality (Woody Allen comes to mind) tend to get criticised for what they leave out or marginalise.

Melville is the only director whose misogyny really bothers me, I guess because whereas Tarantino approaches women like a clueless adolescent, Melville comes across as a gloating male chauvinist bastard. The woman in Le Doulos barely even qualifies as a femme fatale, and her role in the story seems engineered merely to give the men an excuse to punish her. Even Simone Signoret in l'Armee des Ombres ends up fulfilling a (sort of) similar role. Tarantino's women fulfill slightly less unpleasant male fantasies: they're strong enough to be cool/sexy, but ultimately in thrall to men in various ways.

Does anyone out there know any women who like Melville or Tarantino?

Post Reply