Kino: Buster Keaton: The Short Films Collection (1920-1923)

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Message
Author
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Kino

#2 Post by SpiderBaby »

On blu-ray too. This is great news.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Kino

#3 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Well, shit. I already have the excellent MoC box, but Blu-ray and new features seems impossible to pass up.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Kino

#4 Post by swo17 »

That excludes the 13 Keaton/Arbuckle films included in the MoC box, which aren't at the same level as Keaton's solo shorts but which are worthwhile nonetheless. But still, wow. And if HD materials are available I wonder if MoC will consider revisiting their boxset.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Kino

#5 Post by captveg »

Fantastic news. This may end up being the Blu-ray set of the year for me.
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Kino

#6 Post by Roger Ryan »

I figured they'd go for the shorts on Blu-ray eventually. I'm sure the picture quality for vary greatly from film to film (THE BOAT is in pretty bad shape), but it's bound to look better that Kino's DVD issues. I assume they'll use the fully-restored version of HARD LUCK this time around, too.

I wonder if this marks the end of Kino issuing Keaton on Blu-ray with the remaining features being left on SD only?
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Kino

#7 Post by swo17 »

Roger Ryan wrote:I wonder if this marks the end of Kino issuing Keaton on Blu-ray with the remaining features being left on SD only?
Maybe. Although it's weird that they would do Three Ages and not Seven Chances and The Navigator at least.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Kino

#8 Post by matrixschmatrix »

That would be pretty disappointing- I was assuming that their goal was eventually to get the whole Art of Buster Keaton set out on blu.
onedimension
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:35 pm

Re: Kino

#9 Post by onedimension »

My guess is more double-feature blu rays of Keaton.. Go West is awesome, his face & that cow
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Kino

#10 Post by Roger Ryan »

matrixschmatrix wrote:That would be pretty disappointing- I was assuming that their goal was eventually to get the whole Art of Buster Keaton set out on blu.
I thought they might wait until the features had been issued before putting out the shorts collection, although I seriously doubt there would be much of a market for something like THE SAPHEAD on Blu. Maybe all the discs will be repackaged in a box set with films like SAPHEAD, GO WEST and BATTLING BUTLER being exclusive to the set.

The Keaton Blu-ray releases seem to follow a pattern of declining desirability, at least from my perspective :lol:. THE GENERAL, SHERLOCK JR. and OUR HOSPITALITY were must-haves for me, although I'm happy to have STEAMBOAT BILL, JR. as well. I might even consider re-purchasing THE NAVIGATOR and SEVEN CHANCES if the transfers and extras were good, but I don't think I would double-dip for the remaining three.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Kino

#11 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I'd be happy if they did more of them with commentaries, and Our Hospitality was enough of a step down both in picture quality and extras from the Sherlock Jr./Three Ages release that I still haven't upgraded, but frankly I'm figuring I'm going to buy every one of them sooner or later. I don't know that there's a silent movie on blu-ray out there that I don't have at least some interest in, aside from maybe the Ten Commandments.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Kino

#12 Post by captveg »

Seven Chances is my 3rd favorite Keaton film after The General and The Cameraman, so they better release it on Blu.

But I think they will. This seems more like an omen of the success of their Keaton Blu-ray sales.

I can see them putting the rest out as double features, with one popular and one less popular. That's only 3 more releases for the 6 remaining features. They're all only 60-75 mins. or so, so space wouldn't much of an issue.

Now, if only Warner would go Blu for a double feature of The Cameraman and Spite Marriage.... :-"
User avatar
SpiderBaby
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:34 pm

Re: Kino

#13 Post by SpiderBaby »

Image
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Kino

#14 Post by swo17 »

Oh yay, they're going to be colorized then.
User avatar
John Edmond
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:35 am

Re: Kino

#15 Post by John Edmond »

Oh I like Kino's awful covers. Now that they've got their shit together it's the only thing that connects them to their past.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Kino

#16 Post by matrixschmatrix »

Outside of the Three Ages bubble on Sherlock Jr, I thought they'd actually been doing pretty well on the Keaton blus up till now.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Kino

#17 Post by knives »

The worst part is that this would be a great cover if it were in B&W.
Jonathan S
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:31 am
Location: Somerset, England

Re: Kino

#18 Post by Jonathan S »

Kino's "colorized" cover may be accurately reproducing (or at least mimicking) original publicity, which in the silent era - and later of course - often displayed coloured stills for black & white (or merely tinted) films. Whether it sends out the right message on a disc cover today is perhaps another matter...
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Kino

#19 Post by colinr0380 »

It is the radioactive glow surrounding both of the figures that troubles me even more than the 'colorization'!
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Kino

#20 Post by Roger Ryan »

colinr0380 wrote:It is the radioactive glow surrounding both of the figures that troubles me even more than the 'colorization'!

Well, that still is from THE ELECTRIC HOUSE, isn't it? I'm not surprised Keaton and the girl are glowing. :lol:
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Kino

#21 Post by hearthesilence »

Jonathan S wrote:Kino's "colorized" cover may be accurately reproducing (or at least mimicking) original publicity, which in the silent era - and later of course - often displayed coloured stills for black & white (or merely tinted) films. Whether it sends out the right message on a disc cover today is perhaps another matter...
Just out of curiousity, what proportion of silent films were actually 'colored' back in the day? It's been a while, but the most surprising lesson I had when I took a silent film course at the George Eastman House was that silent films were often colored - not just with tinting, but with selective coloring too, thanks to stencils and microbrushes, etc. They even showed a print of Cyrano de Bergerac that had the coloring intact. It looked crude, but not as a bad as I thought it would. I think the professor said this was fairly common, but I can't remember how common...
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Kino

#22 Post by swo17 »

hearthesilence wrote:
Jonathan S wrote:Kino's "colorized" cover may be accurately reproducing (or at least mimicking) original publicity, which in the silent era - and later of course - often displayed coloured stills for black & white (or merely tinted) films. Whether it sends out the right message on a disc cover today is perhaps another matter...
Just out of curiousity, what proportion of silent films were actually 'colored' back in the day? It's been a while, but the most surprising lesson I had when I took a silent film course at the George Eastman House was that silent films were often colored - not just with tinting, but with selective coloring too, thanks to stencils and microbrushes, etc. They even showed a print of Cyrano de Bergerac that had the coloring intact. It looked crude, but not as a bad as I thought it would. I think the professor said this was fairly common, but I can't remember how common...
That's a different issue from colorizing publicity artwork, but I'm going to say 5-10%, based on my experience.
User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Kino

#23 Post by Peacock »

swo17 wrote:but I'm going to say 5-10%, based on my experience.
Your experience? Award for oldest forum member goes to.....
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Kino

#24 Post by perkizitore »

It is well known that swo has seen more silent films than knappen and HerrShreck combined...
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Kino

#25 Post by MichaelB »

Tinting and toning was very common indeed for prestige titles, and one of the challenges facing film restorers is to reproduce the exact tones that were originally used. In the case of the 1903 Alice in Wonderland, the only surviving print was black and white, but there was sufficient written evidence in Cecil Hepworth's papers of how the film was intended to look, complete with the chemical formulae to create specific tones - for the restoration, the toning was carried out digitally, but on the basis of some highly educated guesswork.
Post Reply