The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1101 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

CSM126 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 5:43 pm I wonder if the English dub lends the show some kind of coherent plot. Probably not.
That quite helpfully is where End Of Evangelion comes to the rescue! But seriously they're using the classic dub because the latest dub was funded by Netflix. I prefer the classic dub for End Of Evangelion fwiw.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1102 Post by CSM126 »

Jean-Luc Garbo wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 6:51 pm
CSM126 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 5:43 pm I wonder if the English dub lends the show some kind of coherent plot. Probably not.
That quite helpfully is where End Of Evangelion comes to the rescue! But seriously they're using the classic dub because the latest dub was funded by Netflix. I prefer the classic dub for End Of Evangelion fwiw.
I am not going to watch that whole series and then a movie just to find out what the story is. I got five episodes in and nothing resembling a plot had even started to form around the random events they spammed at the screen.

My friends wonder why I dislike anime generally and it’s because most of it is like this and, I dunno, a story would be nice for so many hours of my time.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1103 Post by Michael Kerpan »

CSM -- disliking ALL anime because of seeing one notoriously impenetrable one seems a bit . . . extreme. (I've never bothered to watch it because of it -- and Anno's -- reputation). I assure MOST of anime is NOT like this. (Lots of shows may be problematic -- but not for this reason).
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1104 Post by Lowry_Sam »

I wish Criterion would get hold of MTV properties Aeon Flux, The Maxx, Downtown and Liquid Television, none of which have received upgrades since getting released on DVD. I think Daria & Beavis And Butthead may have been bought up by someone since airing on MTV so they would probably be more difficult.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1105 Post by CSM126 »

Michael Kerpan wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 7:24 pmCSM -- disliking ALL anime because of seeing one notoriously impenetrable one seems a bit . . . extreme. (I've never bothered to watch it because of it -- and Anno's -- reputation). I assure MOST of anime is NOT like this. (Lots of shows may be problematic -- but not for this reason).
That’s not what I said, but ok. I’ve tried other anime and most of what I saw was impenetrable stuff like that. There’s a lot of hyperactive nonsense, which just isn’t for me most of the time. I mean, Studio Ghibli of course has made some lovely anime films and I’m sure there’s plenty I haven’t seen that are nice.

All I said was that a large chunk of the stuff I have been exposed to was bad and confusingly plotless. Admittedly I got a bad start because my first ever anime was Akira, which is awful. But I do like some anime.
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1106 Post by CSM126 »

Lowry_Sam wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 7:56 pmI wish Criterion would get hold of MTV properties Aeon Flux, The Maxx, Downtown and Liquid Television, none of which have received upgrades since getting released on DVD. I think Daria & Beavis And Butthead may have been bought up by someone since airing on MTV so they would probably be more difficult.
Daria and B&B are doubtlessly lost in music rights hell that nobody would want to cough up the money to fix.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1107 Post by Mr Sausage »

CSM126 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 7:14 pm
Jean-Luc Garbo wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 6:51 pm
CSM126 wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2026 5:43 pm I wonder if the English dub lends the show some kind of coherent plot. Probably not.
That quite helpfully is where End Of Evangelion comes to the rescue! But seriously they're using the classic dub because the latest dub was funded by Netflix. I prefer the classic dub for End Of Evangelion fwiw.
I am not going to watch that whole series and then a movie just to find out what the story is. I got five episodes in and nothing resembling a plot had even started to form around the random events they spammed at the screen.

My friends wonder why I dislike anime generally and it’s because most of it is like this and, I dunno, a story would be nice for so many hours of my time.
Evangelion is widely understood to go completely off the rails 2/3 in, becoming this surreal, near-abstract excavation of the main character's consciousness. As a result the series has no proper ending, but it concludes in a fascinating way. The follow up movie, in addition to completing the main plot, is also a full-throated condemnation of obsessive anime fandoms and all their worst tendencies (an ambivalent one, as Evangelion played an oversized role in cultivating some of the more unhealthy attitudes, like 'fan service').

I had a lot of issues with the first two thirds of the show, but found them worth watching just to get to that magnificent final third where the creative team just goes mental. So, yes, if you're looking for coherent plotting and controlled storytelling, Evangelion isn't that. It's weird, symbolic, and introspective rather than narrative focused, and that's true even before it abandons even trying to tell a story. But there are pleasures in there amid the more trying material.
CSM126 wrote:That’s not what I said, but ok. I’ve tried other anime and most of what I saw was impenetrable stuff like that. There’s a lot of hyperactive nonsense, which just isn’t for me most of the time. I mean, Studio Ghibli of course has made some lovely anime films and I’m sure there’s plenty I haven’t seen that are nice.

All I said was that a large chunk of the stuff I have been exposed to was bad and confusingly plotless. Admittedly I got a bad start because my first ever anime was Akira, which is awful. But I do like some anime.
Have you tried things like Metropolis, The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, Summer Wars, or Patema Inverted? They're coherent and well plotted, and not overly manic. Your Name is also charming and moving, tho' it does get quite excessive at the end. The Patlabor movies are terrific political thrillers. Satoshi Kon's movies are usually quite ambiguous and puzzling, but his big crowd-pleasing holiday film, Tokyo Godfathers, is lovely. Try it out. And if you don't mind something a bit out there so long as it's charming and creative, try Night is Short, Walk on Girl. It's not your typical kind of story, but it's not hard to follow, either.

No need to let these early experiences of yours become a settled prejudice. Anime is a medium rather than a genre. There's a variety of stuff to find, some of which you might come to dearly love.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: The Criterion Channel -- Film and Content Discussion

#1108 Post by Michael Kerpan »

My sons aand I made it about 15 minutes into Akira and turned it off. We decided that it had already used up its whole allotted quota of explosions.

You might want to check out the work of Naoko Yamada -- such as Heike Monoigatari and the currently-airing Jaadugar.
Post Reply