UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1726 Post by Finch »

Heads-up on Dolby Vision display issues on the Panasonic UB820 for the HK cut of Rumble in the Bronx where it's a black screen (like Arrow 's TCM2 and The Eye UHDs) and heavy flickering on the HK cut of First Strike on one user's Sony X700 so far.

I still haven't seen any acknowledgement from Arrow yet if the 4.0 and 5.1 tracks on the Audition UHD are going to be fixed. The 2.0 track is fine.
rrenault
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:49 pm

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1727 Post by rrenault »

nicolas wrote: Sat Jun 20, 2026 7:24 pm The Pornographers is a great disc. I wanted to post in the release thread as well and post it here once I’m able to open the disc for screenshots. The master is SDR with fine grain, a beautiful grayscale and excellent audio. I’m not sure if this was communicated here but Radiance actually did the restoration. The BD is very good too but I noticed a nice uptick in fine detail when I checked the 4K afterwards. The Tony Rayns interview runs 47 minutes and is a career overview.
As I’m on a limited budget, I’m still waiting to hear what the word is on BFI’s Rocco and His Brothers UHD. If it turns out to be a negligible upgrade over Eureka’s bluray, then I’ll go ahead and pick up The Pornographers!
nicolas
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:34 pm

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1728 Post by nicolas »

Explorers (Vinegar Syndrome) - caps and comparison video
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1729 Post by Finch »

The Flintstones (Shout) caps
User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:46 pm

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1730 Post by andyli »

rrenault wrote:Why are the WB UHDs of 2001 and The Shining still in the red column? Aren’t those acknowledged to be flawed, due to color grading issues(the “Nolan restoration”) in the case of the former and audio and AR issues with respect to the latter?
I seem to remember reading somewhere (could be in this very thread) that the 2001 4K is not the same as the "Nolan restoration", which is pretty much about striking a new print and showing in selected cinema.
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1731 Post by tenia »

My memory also is that the 2001 UHD doesn't use Nolan's restoration.
nicolas
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 3:34 pm

Re: UHD New Releases, Reissues and Upgrades

#1732 Post by nicolas »

Nolan and Hoyte van Hoytema were involved in creating “unrestored” prints for cinemas and according to Geoff D he wanted to be involved in overseeing the 4K master for the UHD as well, which WB didn’t initially plan.

As this was still relatively early in the 4K era and soon after he remastered his own films, 2001 shares some of the mastering quirks. At the time, Nolan was bothered by scanner noise that made his images noisier than intended, which led him to use DNR on Batman Begins in particular. It’s been a while since I watched 2001 but there are instances of DNR as well. The color grade is another point of contention as it doesn’t really match what people saw on 35mm prints but Nolan’s “unrestored” prints apparently didn’t either. Here’s WB’s trailer for the Nolan prints:

2001 Unrestored YouTube Trailer.
Post Reply