Criterion and UHD

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
bluesforyou
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2020 10:35 am

Re: Criterion and UHD

#476 Post by bluesforyou »

I was afraid Criterion was going to throw Raging Bull on Blu-ray but it will almost certainly be a UHD now.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#477 Post by Ribs »

bluesforyou wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:30 pm I was afraid Criterion was going to throw Raging Bull on Blu-ray but it will almost certainly be a UHD now.
Forget Raging Bull, look forward to Isle of Dogs!
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion and UHD

#478 Post by swo17 »

Drucker wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:21 pm Someone please recommend a good 4k projector thank you.
None of them. You want an OLED apparently
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#479 Post by dwk »

What a great slate.

Is The Piano still with Lionsgate? If, so, maybe The Limey will also get a UHD.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#480 Post by Ribs »

dwk wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:34 pm What a great slate.

Is The Piano still with Lionsgate? If, so, maybe The Limey will also get a UHD.
It is a Miramax-owned title so should be coming from Paramount.
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#481 Post by dwk »

Ribs wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:35 pm
dwk wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:34 pm What a great slate.

Is The Piano still with Lionsgate? If, so, maybe The Limey will also get a UHD.
It is a Miramax-owned title so should be coming from Paramount.
I don't know, its home video has always been Lionsgate (well Artisan then Lionsgate.) But, looking at the production companies on IMDB, and I think Miramax's rights might have expired and the film is back with the original producers.
User avatar
Luke M
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:21 am

Re: Criterion and UHD

#482 Post by Luke M »

Ribs wrote:
Luke M wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 3:35 pm I'm guessing Mulholland Drive on account of the Studio Canal 4K being released.
This would not be consistent with what we’ve been told seeing as that title is no longer licensed, it’s owned by Janus.
Haters gonna hate.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#483 Post by Ribs »

dwk wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:43 pm
Ribs wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:35 pm
dwk wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:34 pm What a great slate.

Is The Piano still with Lionsgate? If, so, maybe The Limey will also get a UHD.
It is a Miramax-owned title so should be coming from Paramount.
I don't know, its home video has always been Lionsgate (well Artisan then Lionsgate.) But, looking at the production companies on IMDB, and I think Miramax's rights might have expired and the film is back with the original producers.
If you go to rent the film online it is through Miramax so they should still have ownership.
User avatar
Ribs
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 5:14 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#484 Post by Ribs »

Luke M wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:49 pm
Ribs wrote:
Luke M wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 3:35 pm I'm guessing Mulholland Drive on account of the Studio Canal 4K being released.
This would not be consistent with what we’ve been told seeing as that title is no longer licensed, it’s owned by Janus.
Haters gonna hate.
I was right, though - it isn’t licensed, but the wrinkle I didn’t anticipate was the studio in fact being an international rightsholder rather than the domestic one.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#485 Post by EddieLarkin »

swo17 wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:33 pm
Drucker wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:21 pm Someone please recommend a good 4k projector thank you.
None of them. You want an OLED apparently
It's true that projectors are definitely the worst performers when it comes to HDR (offering around 300 nits of light output), but ultimately it comes down to personal preference. One may prefer to sacrifice some HDR performance for a vastly bigger screen (which will of course offer the most noticeable resolution benefits). Even OLED is a compromise in HDR respects, as they offer half (600-900 nits depending on model) of what some top end LCDs can do (but hugely make up for it with their true black ability).

If I was buying a 4K projector, I would go for a JVC DLA-NX7, combined with a madVR renderer to ensure best performance of HDR. That's about the best "reasonable" money can buy...
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#486 Post by jedgeco »

EddieLarkin wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 4:55 pmJVC DLA-NX7, combined with a madVR renderer to ensure best performance of HDR. That's about the best "reasonable" money can buy...
JVC NX5 is reportedly almost as good as the NX7 and ~$3K less. Epson 5050 looks good for something in the sub-$3,000 price range, but uses pixel-shifting instead of native 4K.
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#487 Post by jedgeco »

Each title will be available in a 4K UHD+Blu-ray combo pack including a 4K UHD disc of the feature film as well as the film and its special features on Blu-ray.
Dual format lives!
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Criterion and UHD

#488 Post by movielocke »

very nice balanced slate. Two top sellers for fans (Beatles and Lynch), two canonical classics (in B&W and Color) and two from filmmakers from groups that typically under-represented in format advances.
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion and UHD

#489 Post by FrauBlucher »

Any guesses at what will the price point be?
User avatar
Boosmahn
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:08 am

Re: Criterion and UHD

#490 Post by Boosmahn »

I hope these aren't too expensive.
User avatar
criterionsnob
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:23 am
Location: Canada

Re: Criterion and UHD

#491 Post by criterionsnob »

In addition to price point, I'm curious if they'll continue to do standalone DVDs for the new to UHD titles. They've been dipping their toe into retiring DVD with their Blu-ray only big box releases.
User avatar
jedgeco
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:28 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#492 Post by jedgeco »

Boosmahn wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:10 pm I hope these aren't too expensive.
I would bet on a US $49.99 MSRP, although the announcement suggests there won't be a Blu-only option, so maybe they keep the price the same so as not to dissuade sales to customers without UHD capabilities.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#493 Post by therewillbeblus »

jedgeco wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:22 pm
Boosmahn wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:10 pm I hope these aren't too expensive.
I would bet on a US $49.99 MSRP, although the announcement suggests there won't be a Blu-only option, so maybe they keep the price the same so as not to dissuade sales to customers without UHD capabilities.
I'd be thrilled if you're right, but with the little I know about UHD costs for production, I doubt this very much. Maybe they'll return to dual format across the board and release two options - UHD/Blu and a Blu/DVD at $50 and $40 respectively
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#494 Post by tenia »

I doubt it'll be the end of DVD-only releases but I can be wrong.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#495 Post by domino harvey »

DVD sales still outnumber their Blu-ray sales (due in large part to libraries), I would be stunned if they stopped
User avatar
willoneill
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Criterion and UHD

#496 Post by willoneill »

Just go triple-format, as Jesus would want.
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#497 Post by therewillbeblus »

There's no way they'll discontinue DVDs but the question is whether they'll continue to issue DVD-only editions of their releases. If that's the case, it would be pretty frustrating and questionably-conducive to their consumers' desires to package DVDs separately but pair blu and UHD together without separate options for blu as well. Plenty of people have upgraded to blu-ray technology without taking the extra step to UHD, and assuming that those folks who made one jump will eventually succumb to the new technology again isn't strong logic.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Criterion and UHD

#498 Post by mfunk9786 »

👍👍👍
User avatar
ShellOilJunior
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:17 am

Re: Criterion and UHD

#499 Post by ShellOilJunior »

domino harvey wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:51 pm DVD sales still outnumber their Blu-ray sales (due in large part to libraries), I would be stunned if they stopped
You might have a different source than I for the Blu/DVD numbers. As far back as August 2013 the split was Blu 60/ DVD 40.

https://www.criterion.com/current/posts ... ual-format
Last edited by ShellOilJunior on Wed Aug 11, 2021 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Criterion and UHD

#500 Post by tenia »

I think it's also a question of how Criterion are looking at things on their end. It might be that they believe DVD consumers really are aside while BD customers are OK being lumped with UHDs as "premium formats purchasers".

I do wonder however how future proofing works for indies as it doesn't seem to work on the overall market (just like BD/DVD DF releases didn't push BD much). I'm also extremely curious of sales figures for separate releases like Arrow are doing.

As for Criterion sales figures, 2013 is quite a long time ago for what we're looking at. However, I seem to recall Peter Becker talking about it at Lyon in 2019, and my memory of it is that the market split for them heavily depends on whether you factor institutions in, something like 80/20 without them but 50/50 (DVD/BD) with them.
Post Reply