Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4176 Post by cdnchris »

As Fanciful said above, they usually label them "out of print" if they're out of print. It could be a coincidence since they just had the sale and they are out of stock and/or between printings on those titles.
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4177 Post by Drucker »

cdnchris wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 12:26 am As Fanciful said above, they usually label them "out of print" if they're out of print. It could be a coincidence since they just had the sale and they are out of stock and/or between printings on those titles.
Agreed, and I made a pretty penny selling the Trilogy of Life and Salo a few months ago after the last sale. However, a bunch of titles (like Seven Samurai and Salo) now say "on back order."
User avatar
ShempTCat
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:20 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4178 Post by ShempTCat »

Seconds, unlike the previously mentioned Paramount titles, is showing "On Back-Order" rather than "Currently Unavailable."
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4179 Post by EddieLarkin »

Someone asked about Rosemary's Baby and Criterion said it would not be coming back in stock.

Whether that meant not returning in time to offer a replacement, or not returning ever, I'm not sure.
guyetgenevieve
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:56 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4180 Post by guyetgenevieve »

I'm not too worried. The Parallax View just got released, and The Furies, which is getting upgraded in April, is through Paramount. The website lists them as "Currently Unavailable" instead of "Out of Print". I think they'll probably be restocked by the time the July B&N sale comes around.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4181 Post by knives »

Yeah, we just had a flash sale and these are popular releases.
User avatar
RSTooley
Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 1:35 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4182 Post by RSTooley »

As of this morning, both Rosemary's Baby and Harold and Maude are listed as back in stock.

I'm interested to see what things look like in a week, as I wouldn't be too surprised if Paramount allowed the rights to their films to lapse.
User avatar
What A Disgrace
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
Contact:

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4184 Post by What A Disgrace »

With the rest of the trilogy in the collection now, I wonder if Criterion can tap Warner for All The President's Men?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4185 Post by knives »

It and the Leigh are definitely very weird omissions.
Billy Beta
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:32 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4186 Post by Billy Beta »

I wonder with their pledge from last year during BLM that they've actively sought out films from filmmakers of African American background
to diversify their output? They seem to have a lot of films in the backlog to release already (most of Wim Wenders catalog for example).

Also with Paramount removing their licenses for various films in the last week or so, that Criterion's monopoly over such lucrative re-releases might be diminishing.
Paramount joins Fox and Studiocanal in the re-acquisition of high profile films from their back catalog.
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4187 Post by FrauBlucher »

I'm going to post here because I will not assume the following is OOP.... The Lady Vanishes is listed as Currently Unavailable, while The Man Who Knew Too Much is listed as On Back Order. Criterion is confusing with their classifications
User avatar
Shrew
The Untamed One
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:22 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4188 Post by Shrew »

I assume back order means that items just need to be taken out of a warehouse (so they have a known number available but they just aren't ready for immediate shipping), while currently unavailable implies that the title actually needs to be reprinted (which could take time depending on the manufacturer's availability, especially during Covid).
User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 7:57 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4189 Post by yoloswegmaster »

Criterion is listed as the licensor for Thomas Vinterberg's Festen on Alamo's website
User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4190 Post by therewillbeblus »

yoloswegmaster wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:30 am Criterion is listed as the licensor for Thomas Vinterberg's Festen on Alamo's website
Excellent, right up their alley and ripe for extras. Outside of being the first Dogme 95 film, hopefully they get an interview with some mental health specialist since it's been assessed as an accurate depiction of the effects of
Spoiler
sexual abuse
User avatar
Maltic
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 5:36 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4191 Post by Maltic »

therewillbeblus wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:35 am Excellent, right up their alley and ripe for extras. Outside of being the first Dogme 95 film, hopefully they get an interview with some mental health specialist since it's been assessed as an accurate depiction of the effects of
Spoiler
sexual abuse

When you press the spoiler box button, it turns green, a bit like choosing the green speech!
User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4192 Post by jwd5275 »

yoloswegmaster wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:30 am Criterion is listed as the licensor for Thomas Vinterberg's Festen on Alamo's website
There was Thomas Vinterberg phantom page as far back as 2013, so I suspect they have had the rights for a while...
Bressonaire
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4193 Post by Bressonaire »

Has the guessing thread been abandoned? It's like the third time in four months the thread has been inoperative, or barely so. Anyway, these are the June titles:

Upgrades of The Human Condition and Pickup on South Street
Box set of Marlon Riggs movies
Streetwise/Tiny
Pariah
Standalone Visions of Eight from the Olympic box

(Congrats to CSM126, who shrewdly predicted the Marlon Riggs box a couple months ago.)
User avatar
agnamaracs
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:13 am

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4194 Post by agnamaracs »

Yeah, I was gonna say, did anyone remember what today was?!
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4195 Post by Glowingwabbit »

The titles are already on the website
User avatar
criterionsnob
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:23 am
Location: Canada

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4196 Post by criterionsnob »

I figured they’d skip today to avoid getting lost in the Oscar news. Great surprise on the Riggs set!
Bressonaire
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:49 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4197 Post by Bressonaire »

Yeah, that's where I found them. Criterion seems to have been announcing midday for a few months now. I remember it used to be at 3 p.m., then later, at 6 p.m.
User avatar
Apperson
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:47 pm
Location: Oxfordshire, UK

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4198 Post by Apperson »

I wonder what the holdup was for Pickup on South Street, seeing as Eureka put out the 4k restoration over here six years ago?
Last edited by Apperson on Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Glowingwabbit
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4199 Post by Glowingwabbit »

Apperson wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:36 pm I wonder what the holdup was for Pickup on South Street, seeing as Eureka put out the 4k restoration over here six year ago?
I know! I finally gave up waiting last year and got the MoC. Kinda wish this was a White Dog upgrade instead.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#4200 Post by domino harvey »

I'm guessing it was a now or never situation given the Fox/Disney mess. Perhaps they retained the rights as a "One day" kinda holding and then moved it forward only when it was in danger of lapsing/going away forever
Post Reply