Quentin Tarantino

Discuss individual directors, actors, cinematographers, writers, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#26 Post by Cinesimilitude »

toiletduck! wrote:
Daze wrote:Tarantino's problem is that he doesn't make many movies. Pulp Fiction came out 12 years ago, and he's only put out three features since then (and that's counting Kill Bill as two). By comparison, Woody Allen and Spike Lee have made ten features apiece in that time.
I, too, hate Terrence Malick. Uwe Boll, on the other hand, is really starting to pick up the pace. That boy's got promise!
Best. Post. Ever. =D>
Carson Dyle
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:46 am

#27 Post by Carson Dyle »

Joe Buck wrote:I saw Kill Bill 1 because of all the hype but thought it was all style and no substance, and didn't care enough to even bother to see Kill Bill 2.
Joe Buck, you should rent Kill Bill Vol. 2. I felt similarly about Vol 1, but Vol 2 is a vastly superior film. It even made me appreciate Vol 1 a little more, since I now knew what point Tarantino was trying to make.
rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm

#28 Post by rs98762001 »

Both Kill Bills were boring and derivative, which pretty much encapsulates Tarantino in general.
User avatar
jorencain
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:45 am

#29 Post by jorencain »

rs98762001 wrote:Both Kill Bills were boring and derivative, which pretty much encapsulates Tarantino in general.
You're mom's boring and derivative. Sorry, I don't know why I was compelled to say that, but I had to.

Anyway, I for one enjoy Tarantino's work. This argument has been going on for as long as I've been checking out this forum, but...While he may be derivative, I've got no problem with it. There's an energy in his films that you don't get in most films that have come out in the past 15 years. I think that the Kill Bill's were very good complements to each other, and I enjoyed them immensely. He definitely wears his influences on his sleeve, but that's not an issue for me. I've been entertained by all of his films, and I look forward to his next project.
User avatar
pzman84
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:05 pm

#30 Post by pzman84 »

Tarantino needs to grow up. End of discussion. End of cinema.
rs98762001
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm

#31 Post by rs98762001 »

jorencain wrote: There's an energy in his films that you don't get in most films that have come out in the past 15 years.
Wow. You need to see a lot more films.
User avatar
jorencain
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:45 am

#32 Post by jorencain »

rs98762001 wrote:
jorencain wrote: There's an energy in his films that you don't get in most films that have come out in the past 15 years.
Wow. You need to see a lot more films.
OK.
User avatar
toiletduck!
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: The 'Go
Contact:

#33 Post by toiletduck! »

pzman84 wrote:Tarantino needs to grow up.
The one thing I can appreciate about Tarantino's work, in both those films that I enjoy and those that I can do without, is the child-like glee that this man seems to have regarding film. (It's the only thing I can appreciate about interviews with the guy.) This is a man who truly loves film, watching it, making it, whatever the case may be, and he's having a blast doing it.

If you don't like his work, fine. But if you are so jaded that not only can you not appreciate his youthfulness, but you find it to be a problem, then I guess it is the end of discussion. I sure as hell don't know where to go from there.

When youthfulness is bad and "growing up" is ideal, count me out.
User avatar
jesus the mexican boi
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 9:09 am
Location: South of the Capitol of Texas

#34 Post by jesus the mexican boi »

toiletduck! wrote:When youthfulness is bad and "growing up" is ideal, count me out.
Toilet Duck shoots! He scores!
User avatar
pzman84
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:05 pm

#35 Post by pzman84 »

toiletduck! wrote:But if you are so jaded that not only can you not appreciate his youthfulness, but you find it to be a problem, then I guess it is the end of discussion. I sure as hell don't know where to go from there.

When youthfulness is bad and "growing up" is ideal, count me out.
Youthfulness isn't a problem, when you are almost 30. When you are 42, like Tarintino is, it's time you start to "settle down," if you will, in your films. Now, I am not saying you have to make some melodramatic fluff, as scene in all of today's "presitge" film. However, if you spend your entire life making films with kung-fu and spaghetti western references, as well as toliet humor, it is going to get old very quick. There is only so many "big dick" jokes people can take before they stop going to see his movies.
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#36 Post by skuhn8 »

pzman84 wrote:Youthfulness isn't a problem, when you are almost 30. When you are 42, like Tarintino is, it's time you start to "settle down," if you will, in your films. Now, I am not saying you have to make some melodramatic fluff, as scene in all of today's "presitge" film. However, if you spend your entire life making films with kung-fu and spaghetti western references, as well as toliet humor, it is going to get old very quick. There is only so many "big dick" jokes people can take before they stop going to see his movies.
didn't know the guy was 42--or cared. The way I see it QT picked up where the French New Wave left off. Just as they sucked up, digested and vomited out Film Noir and classic American cinema, this guy ate up all that he could from whatever video stores he worked at. I don't care for kung fu flicks myself and haven't even seen Kill Bill 1 (saw Kill Bill 2 though--not my bag) but I think Dogs, Pulp, and Jackie Brown are definitely worthy of classic status. If I may venture into analysis here, I think the problem many have with this director on this board and elsewhere in this country is that A) not European and/or B) he's a very public persona, but mostly the latter. If he pulled a Salinger/Pynchon then his detractors would be probably scouring his every scene for some glimpse into the mysterious inner machinations of the artist. Certainly not suggesting that he is the beginning and end of cinema but if you really want to chase after phonies there's got to be worthier targets out there. This guy loves cinema; it's obvious in every shot. And the avenue he took reeks of Cahiers. He didn't pick it as a career, do the whole film school thing. He just loved it soaked it up and made a films with story and style, something so soarly lacking nowadays with all this 1/2 second headache shot shit (i.e. Confidence) or the jittery handicam-oh-it-oh-so-dogma-95!
User avatar
Alonzo the Armless
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:57 am

#37 Post by Alonzo the Armless »

It looks like there's another edition of Reservoir Dogs coming out. I read about this 15th Anniversdary edition. I don't plan on double dipping, but the packaging is pretty clever. The specs, packaging, and a short interview with Michael madsen can be found here.
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#38 Post by Cinesimilitude »

It's also supposed to be on blu-ray already, but I think it got delayed to January. the new re-issue is simply because lionsgate now has the rights. the 2 disc artisan films release has better features.
User avatar
exte
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: NJ

#39 Post by exte »

Can the beaver verify if a new transfer has fixed the colors?
User avatar
barnyard078
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:37 pm

#40 Post by barnyard078 »

I have picked up the 15th anniversary edition. Yes, the colors have been fixed, and yes, I think this is the best the film may have looked in a long time. Sell your old copy, and buy the new one now!
User avatar
jon
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:03 am

#41 Post by jon »

i dont trust you
Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#42 Post by Cinesimilitude »

jon wrote:i dont trust you
I wouldnt either, and based on the old beaver comparison, I like the muted colors more.
User avatar
gubbelsj
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 6:44 pm
Location: San Diego

#43 Post by gubbelsj »

pzman84 wrote:Youthfulness isn't a problem, when you are almost 30. When you are 42, like Tarintino is, it's time you start to "settle down," if you will, in your films. Now, I am not saying you have to make some melodramatic fluff, as scene in all of today's "presitge" film. However, if you spend your entire life making films with kung-fu and spaghetti western references, as well as toliet humor, it is going to get old very quick. There is only so many "big dick" jokes people can take before they stop going to see his movies.
Sorry to resurrect this old argument, but here goes. Far be it from me to hold Tarantino up as the quote unquote great american director. He's far too derivative - and transparently derivative at that, which adds to his charm, but undercuts his talent. However, I think there's more to him than kung-fu and dick jokes. My favorite of all his movies is probably Jackie Brown, which doesn't feature much in the way of action and deliberately stays away from the famed "Tarantino one-liners" so popular among American youth in the mid-90s. I can well remember the sense of disappointment among the 16-25 year old crowd after Jackie Brown premiered, with the chief complaint being that there weren't enough, ahem, kung-fu set pieces and dick jokes. They kind of desperately hung on to Sam Jackson's "When you absolutely, positively blah blah blah.." as a life vest, because it offered the only Pulp Fiction-like entry into the film. With the two main characters middle-aged individuals sizing up their life choices and unsure of what action to take, it's actually quite an adult film, albeit with plenty of verbal and visual action. And the box office response was sluggish. Duly noted, he returned years later with, yes, a kung fu movie. And as much as I liked Kill Bill, it would've been interesting to see what direction he might have moved in had he followed the calmer rhythms of Jackie Brown. He may yet.
User avatar
barnyard078
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:37 pm

#44 Post by barnyard078 »

DVDBeaver has not yet posted a comparison for the new disc, which, IMHO, would prove the superiority of the new transfer. For my money, the 10th anniversary edition's washed-out colors are a major distraction. The suits appear grey instead of black, the blood looks unconvincing, and it takes me right out of the viewing experience. I am just speaking as someone who has owned the 10th Ann. DVD for five years, hoping a better transfer would come along, and this is that better transfer. So, believe me or not, it is just my opinion.
User avatar
exte
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:27 pm
Location: NJ

#45 Post by exte »

barnyard078 wrote:I am just speaking as someone who has owned the 10th Ann. DVD for five years...
Christ, has it been that long!? I remember getting this just a few years ago... Now I feel totally old. :(

EDIT: Amazon lists the 10th as being released August 27, 2002. So, it's only been 4 years... (and I actually do feel better.)
User avatar
The Invunche
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Denmark

#46 Post by The Invunche »

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#47 Post by Matt »

A new twist on Pulp Fiction. (Quicktime video)
User avatar
lord_clyde
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:22 am
Location: Ogden, UT

#48 Post by lord_clyde »

Cinesimilitude
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am

#49 Post by Cinesimilitude »

I highly recommend seeing the Lebowski and Casino versions of the link above.
User avatar
lord_clyde
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:22 am
Location: Ogden, UT

#50 Post by lord_clyde »

SncDthMnky wrote:I highly recommend seeing the Lebowski and Casino versions of the link above.
Don't forget Scarface. The Departed should be coming along anytime now. . .
Post Reply