Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
FakeBonanza
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#151 Post by FakeBonanza »

justeleblanc wrote:Rita Hayworth is entirely possible... but my mind went to a different place.

Robin + Bird + Wig.... could it be The Birdcage?
That's an even bigger reach than the twitter guess for Hedwig and the Angry Inch.
User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#152 Post by Lemmy Caution »

If the bird looked peeved, I'd like the answer being Head Wig and the Angry Finch ...
EricJ
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:32 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#153 Post by EricJ »

swo17 wrote:
EricJ wrote:Case in point, are the flood of running Midnight Cowboy in-jokes REALLY coming from people who still don't get it?
If that clue really was for Il sorpasso then it was the worst clue of all time, as evidenced by the fact that it didn't even retroactively occur to anyone as the possible answer until like a year after the fact.
Okay, fill in the new guy: HOW on EARTH was the, quote-fingers, "Il Sorpasso clue" not the
Spoiler
terminally ailing
Ratzo?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#154 Post by domino harvey »

EricJ wrote:
swo17 wrote:
EricJ wrote:Case in point, are the flood of running Midnight Cowboy in-jokes REALLY coming from people who still don't get it?
If that clue really was for Il sorpasso then it was the worst clue of all time, as evidenced by the fact that it didn't even retroactively occur to anyone as the possible answer until like a year after the fact.
Okay, fill in the new guy: HOW on EARTH was the, quote-fingers, "Il Sorpasso clue" not the
Spoiler
terminally ailing
Ratzo?
Ill sore possu' -- And yes, those who believe the clue for this isn't clearly Midnight Cowboy really think that's what it was saying.

Image
User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:28 am
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#155 Post by FrauBlucher »

Maybe this thread needs to self destruct 2 hours after the first guess.






(Feel free to fill in the visual)
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#156 Post by swo17 »

Or locked once it's been obviously solved.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#157 Post by domino harvey »

FrauBlucher wrote:Maybe this thread needs to self destruct 2 hours after the first guess.

Image

(Feel free to fill in the visual)
giovannii84
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#158 Post by giovannii84 »

Another option... Bye Bye Birdie.

Bird with Ann-Margret hair
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#159 Post by CSM126 »

giovannii84 wrote:Another option... Bye Bye Birdie.

Bird with Ann-Margret hair
Twilight Time, so no.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#160 Post by EddieLarkin »

domino harvey wrote: Image
Do you happen to know off hand which episode that's from? Sure wish Criterion were releasing a complete VM on Blu-ray...
User avatar
Minkin
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:13 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#161 Post by Minkin »

I think the newsletters just appeal to the puzzlers/jumblers amongst our crowd. Its like when TCM decided to add a crossword puzzle to their monthly magazine. I say let people have their fun (and sometimes it could lead to a better result - as we could've called it a day at Red Beard). I think these problems will only continue as the clues aren't generally getting easier/clearer and sometimes not solved correctly until something gets announced (Coat Unknown). Its like this year's New Years clue - where we all just sorta scratched our heads and gave up on most of the clues.

As for the whole Midnight Cowboy vs Sorpasso debacle: Didn't Moe (who was right on Big Chill/Tootsie/etc) confirm that Midnight Cowboy was in the works? Besides, what with the MGM re-release deal (and things like The Graduate being forthcoming), it isn't beyond scope to imagine that Midnight Cowboy wouldn't be pursued. Sometimes these clues takes years to materialize (Grey Gardens, Y tu Mama Tambien, Eraserhead, etc).
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#162 Post by movielocke »

swo17 wrote:
EricJ wrote:Case in point, are the flood of running Midnight Cowboy in-jokes REALLY coming from people who still don't get it?
If that clue really was for Il sorpasso then it was the worst clue of all time, as evidenced by the fact that it didn't even retroactively occur to anyone as the possible answer until like a year after the fact.
Worst or best? We've had a lot more clues of this style, it seems, since they defeated us with the ill sore possum clue. It seems as though the Mulholland drive esque clues are less common.

the first clue I remember of the Ill sore possum variety was lean cow herd, which took a long time to solve as well.
User avatar
carmilla mircalla
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 1:47 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#163 Post by carmilla mircalla »

As hard as some past clues were I wish they were still all like that. I have only guessed one correctly on my own and that was for Limelight but even I thought that was just too easy and uninspired.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#164 Post by swo17 »

movielocke wrote:
swo17 wrote:If that clue really was for Il sorpasso then it was the worst clue of all time, as evidenced by the fact that it didn't even retroactively occur to anyone as the possible answer until like a year after the fact.
Worst or best? We've had a lot more clues of this style, it seems, since they defeated us with the ill sore possum clue. It seems as though the Mulholland drive esque clues are less common.

the first clue I remember of the Ill sore possum variety was lean cow herd, which took a long time to solve as well.
A good clue will take a few minutes to figure out. Some take only a few seconds (e.g. Ace in the Hole). These clues are bad. "Lean cow herd" took the better part of a day for someone to finally solve. The choice of words for the pun was both economical and homophonic. This was probably the best clue they had ever come up with.

Now let's look at "ill sore possum." The first two words are somewhat redundant and only fit in hindsight--no one would have naturally thought based on that image to string those two words together in that order. And then the third word only fits to the extent that you ignore the sound that half of its letters make. If Criterion hadn't subsequently announced Il sorpasso, no one in a million years would have ever guessed that that was the answer. That makes it no better of a clue than if Criterion had simply said "In a couple of months we will announce a '60s movie."
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#165 Post by CSM126 »

I still can't believe how bad the ill sore possum clue was. Did they really not think people would look at it and think "Rat So Sick" and leap to Ratzo Rizzo? I halfway still believe it is a clue for Midnight Cowboy and it's just horrendously delayed.
User avatar
djproject
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#166 Post by djproject »

Now that we all got *that* out of our systems =D
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#167 Post by domino harvey »

EddieLarkin wrote:
domino harvey wrote: Image
Do you happen to know off hand which episode that's from? Sure wish Criterion were releasing a complete VM on Blu-ray...
"Lord of the Pi's"
User avatar
DeprongMori
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:59 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#168 Post by DeprongMori »

Everybody has been looking at the Il Sorpasso clue backwards. It was simply an obscure joke that failed as a newsletter clue because of its obscurity.

If you think about the process, the artist will be given a list of forthcoming releases slated for announcement three months out and be tasked with creating a newsletter clue for one of them. He looks at the list, sees the title Il Sorpasso and thinks "Wow! Can I ever make a silly pun out of that!" And he did. It doesn't matter that it was an obscure film that I had never heard of (nor anyone else here, it seems.) He got inspired, drew it, it got added to the newsletter, and everybody guessed wrong because their wrong guess was less obscure than the film that was hinted at.

It's that simple. Can we finally put this to rest?

(This doesn't mean Midnight Cowboy will not be eventually be released. It just means this wasn't a clue for it.)
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#169 Post by domino harvey »

No, because it was a clue for Midnight Cowboy
criterion10

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#170 Post by criterion10 »

domino harvey wrote:No, because it was a clue for Midnight Cowboy
Image
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#171 Post by swo17 »

It's not that obscure of a film. I had seen it. Plenty others here had as well. It had recently been restored and had been touted for such. But even if the very first thing you saw after watching the film was the drawing of that ailing rodent, you'd still never make the connection without someone first pointing it out to you.

I'm not saying that the clue definitely wasn't for Il sorpasso, just that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty, and until Jason Polan confesses to such a crime, I will continue to give him the benefit of the doubt.
User avatar
AMalickLensFlare
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:22 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#172 Post by AMalickLensFlare »

The bird is definitely not supposed to be a robin; look at that finch-like bill. Canaries are in the finch family because of this (and also because they're passerines, i.e. three toes forward and one toe backward, even though that applies to like more than half of all bird species...the drawing shows the three toes forward, and holy Jesus that was likely not intended to reflect the bird is a passerine but I'm pointing it out anyway), and with no darker shades or distinct markings drawn into the plumage, it's probably intended to be a canary. All signs point to Gilda.
User avatar
djproject
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#173 Post by djproject »

swo17 wrote:I'm not saying that the clue definitely wasn't for Il sorpasso, just that in this country you are innocent until proven guilty, and until Jason Polan confesses to such a crime, I will continue to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Or it can be proven in a court of law with the burden of proof provided by the prosecution. (Come on, we've all seen either/or/both 12 Angry Men and Anatomy of a Murder =D )

In the mean time, he's safe from Shawshank. Though he would miss the 1949 weekly showings of ... Gilda.

*Now* can we consider both that *and* the recent clue discussion closed? =D

(P.S. If I really wanted to be a short-sighted smart-ass, I would have suggested the clue pointed to a Blu-ray upgrade of Berlin Alexanderplatz. Remember, if I wanted to be a short-sighted smart-ass and therefore unable to refute my own claim =] )
EricJ
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:32 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#174 Post by EricJ »

swo17 wrote:It's not that obscure of a film. I had seen it. Plenty others here had as well. It had recently been restored and had been touted for such. But even if the very first thing you saw after watching the film was the drawing of that ailing rodent, you'd still never make the connection without someone first pointing it out to you.
And again, they're not ALL puns--A cult-iconic movie will get a cult icon.
Chaplin in a chicken suit wasn't a pun for "The Gold Rush" (we didn't get little 24K ingots running in sneakers), a wind-up diver wasn't a pun for "Tie Me Up/Down" (although the tie was), if they wanted to do a New Year's pun for "The Brood", they'd have used chicks instead, and remember how many posters were militantly adamant that a panther woman meant the Schrader "Cat People"? (Well, they were on BR.com, anyway.)

Even if enough people recognized a cart vendor to name...whatever that cart vendor movie was, it's a fair assumption to assume more Smart People will have seen a coughing Dustin Hoffman at some point in their art-film experience than have seen an Italian road-trip movie.
Gotta admit, I find the puns too easy.
giovannii84
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter: Clues and More, Volume Four

#175 Post by giovannii84 »

CSM126 wrote:
giovannii84 wrote:Another option... Bye Bye Birdie.

Bird with Ann-Margret hair
Twilight Time, so no.
Twilight Time's release came out in August 2012, so their 3 year licence would have expired.
To my knowledge neither Twilight or Sony have announced a rerelease, so it's a possibility.

Would love for this to be a double clue:
- Gilda
- Bye Bye Birdie
Locked