domino harvey wrote:Irma La Douce is absolutely one of my dream Blu-ray releases from the MGM catalog and I'd take it over any of the Wilders they hold (save the Apartment which is already out)-- even its detractors willingly admit it looks good!
It's the one that continues to grow on me the most. It's moved into my top-tier of Wilders.
captveg wrote:IIRC, MisterLime is NOT Frank Tarzi or another employee of his, but rather an extremely enthusiastic acquaintance who simply gets the acquisition info direct.
And before that, he was "just a fan," and "involved with the press." I'm convinced that "Scott Peck" is a pseudonym for someone who is a big fan of Randolph Scott and Gregory Peck. He also changed his Amazon username to "movie geek 360" so he can write five-star reviews for his own products.
It's far from a great film, but it is so much damned fun. It's also the only film by Ossie Davis that I've seen. Are any of his other directorial efforts worth checking out?
Bob Furmanek wrote:MARTY will be seen on Blu-ray in Delbert Mann's intended 1.85:1 compositions for the first time since the original theatrical release.
Wonder how long it will take for Jeff Wells to write another one of his "1.85 Fascism" articles.
It's far from a great film, but it is so much damned fun. It's also the only film by Ossie Davis that I've seen. Are any of his other directorial efforts worth checking out?
That's the only one I know, too. I'm excited not just to see this one on Blu, but at the prospect of seeing MGM/UA exploitation films from Kino.
How about a Beach Party box set, Kino? It's a no-brainer.
Kino just announced AIP's METEOR. (Contrary to what some have asserted online, the MGM-Kino is not limited to titles from UA, although the majority are indeed UA films.)
Askew wrote:Marty will now be released in the 1.33 ratio.
(Bursts out laughing)
After examining the film elements and consulting with the studio and outside experts, we've decided to release our DVD and Blu-ray of MARTY in anamorphic 1.33:1. There is not a lot of head room in the print, and at 1.85:1 too much of the image was being cropped. So we are releasing it in 1.33:1, the preferred aspect ratio of the studio, and the ratio at which The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences screens their prints of MARTY.
Jesus, common sense actually prevailed? I don't even like the movie but I want to buy a copy to show Kino full support of ignoring BF
Apparently they're using an old DVD era master that is likely missing side information and that seemingly doesn't crop well to the intended ratio. They've chosen their words carefully; they don't refer to 1.33:1 as the correct ratio, just the ratio that works best for their "print".
FWIW Delbert Mann does mention in a few interviews that he preferred the 1.33 format for Marty as it was closest to the television aspect ratio. He and Paddy Chayefsky are on record as having wished to preserve as much of the aesthetic of the live television episode as possible. Keep in mind that the aesthetic philosophy of Mann (and his producer/mentor Fred Coe) was very much "anti-spectacle," and widescreen was still associated with spectacle at that time. I don't mean this to be a definitive answer; as we know, folks can argue about aspect ratios until the cows come home without any kind of resolution.
