John Ford

Discuss individual directors, actors, cinematographers, writers, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:56 am

Re: John Ford

#176 Post by whaleallright »

Thank you. I've also noticed that I've repeated myself from an earlier comment. That's what happens when you have too many things going on at once....
User avatar
scotty2
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:24 am

Re: John Ford

#177 Post by scotty2 »

Brief appreciation of O'Neill and Ford's The Long Voyage Home.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#178 Post by Michael Kerpan »

I suppose this is a better place to discuss the _films_ in the Ford at Fox set. My family watched "Three Bad Men" -- and loved it. I got worried when our elderly Oppo DVD choked on it -- but our middle-aged Sony Blu-Ray player had no problems at all.

I had a complicated reaction to Tobacco Road (on my recent first viewing). A lot more complex (and interesting) than I anticipated, based on all the negative remarks. Did I have"reservations" about it -- yes, lots. But it seemed that there were a lot of positive aspects as well. The almost absurdist humor John Ford found in this seems a lot more appealing than the lurid seriousness of the original source.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#179 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Another previous unknown (to me) gem -- Hangman's House. Excellent, very atmospheric silent film.
User avatar
ellipsis7
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: John Ford

#180 Post by ellipsis7 »

This film contains the first glimpse of John Wayne in a Ford or any other film I guess... He apparently is both the condemned man on the gallows depicted in silhouette and a raucous spectator at the races as seen in the capture below...

Image
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#181 Post by Michael Kerpan »

ellipsis --

Cool! How did you figure this out?
User avatar
ellipsis7
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: John Ford

#182 Post by ellipsis7 »

I think I got it from Tag Gallagher's JOHN FORD book, or suchlike... Also mentioned in these programme notes...
User avatar
liam fennell
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:54 pm

Re: John Ford

#183 Post by liam fennell »

I've only looked at the 3 Will Rogers movies recently from the box. They were all really fun if not particularly ambitious! I started with Steamboat Around the Bend and enjoyed it so much I went right onto the other two and they were equally satisfying. Ford and Rogers make a great team. Ford's humor is kept in check and Rogers it allowed to gracefully joke his way through all three pictures. The rhythms of the movies are matched to his performance, as with Fonda in My Darling Clementine, and to great effect. He is so easy-going as a rule that it is almost shocking when he encounters a serious situation and loses his cool, as in Judge Priest, or is faced with a potentially dangerous situations such as when encountering the swamp people in Steamboat. It's a shame they couldn't keep working together, in a way, one could easily imagine many more fruitful collaborations.

In fact, after those I looked at Donovan's Reef for the first time and couldn't stop thinking about how Will Rogers would've fit right into the thing with a little tiny bit of rewriting. Talk about a movie made in the wrong decade! Slight, perhaps, but perfectly enjoyable.
User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: John Ford

#184 Post by Drucker »

I believe it's in the hour-long interview that accompanies the Stagecoach blu-ray where Ford makes a comment that nobody else he's ever worked with (or seen?) comedically holds a candle to Rogers.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: John Ford

#185 Post by domino harvey »

Worth noting that Will Rogers was unfathomably popular in his day, at a level almost incomprehensible even to our modern era of celebrities. It's been said that Will Rogers' death had a greater effect on the nation (up to that point) than any other death save Lincoln's.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#186 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Being an Oklahoman (in origin), Will Rogers was still quite a posthumous celebrity into the early 60s at least. I lost count of how many times I wound up in Claremore to visit the Will Rogers Memorial Museum.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: John Ford

#187 Post by swo17 »

I remember growing up with this book:

Image
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: John Ford

#188 Post by domino harvey »

Now that I can see it, wow, I am pretty sure I read that when I was younger too (though being from Oklahoma, it shouldn't be too surprising)
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#189 Post by Michael Kerpan »

domino harvey wrote:Now that I can see it, wow, I am pretty sure I read that when I was younger too (though being from Oklahoma, it shouldn't be too surprising)
Alas, I _can't_ see anything.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: John Ford

#190 Post by domino harvey »

Refresh the page, I just changed swo's non-working image to a working one. Or click here
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: John Ford

#191 Post by swo17 »

Thanks for fixing the link.
domino harvey wrote:I am pretty sure I read that when I was younger too (though being from Oklahoma, it shouldn't be too surprising)
Which explains how we both came to value humor. Too bad they never made a "The Value of Being Serious and Taking Things Seriously" book.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#192 Post by Michael Kerpan »

domino harvey wrote:Refresh the page, I just changed swo's non-working image to a working one. Or click here
Firewalled for me, I guess. Oh well, I'll take a look this evening.

It seems like Rogers was very much in the tradition of the early-to-middle period Mark Twain.
User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:44 am

Re: John Ford

#193 Post by movielocke »

hah. I had that book too.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#194 Post by Michael Kerpan »

movielocke wrote:hah. I had that book too.
Finally saw what this was. Way after MY time. Never encountered it.

On another topic -- anyone think that Zanuck actually _improved_ Clementine by his major re-editing?
User avatar
kingofthejungle
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: John Ford

#195 Post by kingofthejungle »

Michael Kerpan wrote:On another topic -- anyone think that Zanuck actually _improved_ Clementine by his major re-editing?
I prefer the Pre-Release version. Aside from the goofy ass insert of the kiss that spoils the ending of the Theatrical cut, I think the extra space for character business and atmosphere in the earlier cut creates a more lyrical, contemplative flow that's entirely appropriate. IIRC, the score is much subtler in the earlier version as well. I think Zanuck's choices might have made it a more commercial picture (as did his ending to The Grapes of Wrath), but I prefer Ford's by a mile.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#196 Post by Michael Kerpan »

It seems Zanuck cut out almost 20 minutes -- I wonder what all disappeared? My sense is that Ford preferred to establish atmosphere (and rhythm) with local color/environmental shots that took a little time to develop -- and that Zanuck wanted to cut right to the chase, using very pushy musical scoring to make up for what was cut.

Seen tonight -- Young Mr. Lincoln. Quite wonderful -- though the proto-Perry Masonesque trial resolution was a bit much.
User avatar
kingofthejungle
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: John Ford

#197 Post by kingofthejungle »

I think you've got the right idea about Ford and Zanuck's different approaches to Clementine. I've never sat down and done a direct comparison between the two (which might be interesting), but I think one can certainly feel the difference between the two versions.

Young Mr. Lincoln is great, a film that grows on me every time I see it. For all the ink spilled on Wayne and Monument Valley, Ford's essence as an artist is found in the relaxed, digressive portraits of small communities (like Young Mr. Lincoln, and The Sun Shines Bright).
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#198 Post by Michael Kerpan »

> Ford's essence as an artist is found in the relaxed, digressive portraits of small communities
> (like Young Mr. Lincoln, and The Sun Shines Bright).

Four Sons, also -- even though in a German setting.
User avatar
AMalickLensFlare
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:22 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Re: John Ford

#199 Post by AMalickLensFlare »

Michael Kerpan wrote:> Ford's essence as an artist is found in the relaxed, digressive portraits of small communities
> (like Young Mr. Lincoln, and The Sun Shines Bright).

Four Sons, also -- even though in a German setting.
And don't forget How Green Was My Valley.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: John Ford

#200 Post by Michael Kerpan »

AMalickLensFlare wrote:And don't forget How Green Was My Valley.
Definitely.
Post Reply