Olive Films

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1326 Post by Gregory »

Not sure why Bel Geddes looks like a ghost. If designers want to mimic old avant-garde photography, that can be okay, but the choices should make sense vis-a-vis the film.
"Opuls"?
User avatar
kingofthejungle
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1327 Post by kingofthejungle »

Gregory wrote:"Opuls"?
That is, for some godforsaken reason, how Ophuls was credited on his American films.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1328 Post by Gregory »

Yeah, but that's not how Olive billed him on the cover of Letter from an Unknown Woman, which was also a U.S. film. Seems like an odd and unnecessary decision.
boywonder
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:24 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1329 Post by boywonder »

Ashirg wrote:Wow, some of those covers look ugly.

http://classicflix.com/OLIVE-Caught-Pea ... 31044.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I don't get Lost Moment cover and Mr. Peabody and The Mermaid looks like was done by swimminghorses.
I can assure you Swimminghorses would consider it an honor to have designed the cover to "Mr. Peabody and the Mermaid"!
Jack Phillips
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:33 am

Re: Olive Films

#1330 Post by Jack Phillips »

domino harvey wrote:Really? I think they're clearly bringing some Criterion-aping A Game. I mean, if anyone on this board knows me, they know I hate Caught but that's an AMAZING cover:
In fact it's a not very interesting variation on what was done for the Wild Side DVD release.
isakborg
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:05 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1331 Post by isakborg »

How could anyone hate Caught? Hate implying something deserving of hate, i.e., pernicious, completely worthless, etc. I'm not looking to debate the matter. I just cannot imagine on what grounds the film (which, yes, I like immensely as I do all of Ophuls) could be "hated".
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1332 Post by knives »

Dom finds it to be exactly those things. Or in his words it is the worst film he's ever seen by a director capable of great movies. I personally wouldn't go that far, but it isn't a film I would want to see again.
Last edited by knives on Thu May 08, 2014 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Olive Films

#1333 Post by swo17 »

See again either?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1334 Post by domino harvey »

Yes, the ol' "Worst film by a great director" declaration, which has found considerable competition in the interim from the likes of Rollover and the Cotton Club and more I'm sure
User avatar
Lowry_Sam
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Olive Films

#1335 Post by Lowry_Sam »

knives wrote:Dom finds it to be exactly those things. Or in his words it is the worst film he's ever seen by a director capable of great movies. I personally wouldn't go that far, but it isn't a film I would want to see again.
I'd rather sit through Caught than

IAMMMMW
Fat Girl
Tiny Furniture
Chasing Amy
Armageddon
The Rock
Contempt

and anything by Wes Anderson :)

I consider Godard & Kramer capable directors. ..I guess I'm the only one who hasn't cared for anything Wes Anderson has done so far. Technically he seems capable, it's just nothing he's done has compelled me to see it more than once (or even through to the end, although I have been able to listen to all of his Terry Gross interviews on NPR in full). I'm sure (almost) everyone can come up with a number of titles in the catalog that are more insufferable than the worst film by Ophuls (if you do consider Caught his worst).
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1336 Post by domino harvey »

None of those films were made by "great directors" though (at least not my definition)
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1337 Post by domino harvey »

domino harvey wrote:Yes, the ol' "Worst film by a great director" declaration, which has found considerable competition in the interim from the likes of Rollover and the Cotton Club and more I'm sure
...and with all the Ford talk, What Price Glory?
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Olive Films

#1338 Post by Mr Sausage »

domino harvey wrote:None of those films were made by "great directors" though (at least not my definition)
Godard isn't a great director in your definition?
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1339 Post by knives »

domino harvey wrote:None of those films were made by "great directors" though (at least not my definition)
Even Contempt? :wink: Though of course this goes down to show how much these proclamations are as subject to personal taste as any other one which suggests a hierarchy of quality.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1340 Post by domino harvey »

Okay, clearly I somehow missed Contempt at the end of that list. JLG is of course one my very favorite directors. Carry on!
User avatar
kingofthejungle
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:25 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1341 Post by kingofthejungle »

domino harvey wrote:
domino harvey wrote:Yes, the ol' "Worst film by a great director" declaration, which has found considerable competition in the interim from the likes of Rollover and the Cotton Club and more I'm sure
...and with all the Ford talk, What Price Glory?
Oh no, The Plough and The Stars is much worse than What Price Glory. Much, much worse.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1342 Post by domino harvey »

It may well be, I have not seen it yet!
User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:56 am

Re: Olive Films

#1343 Post by whaleallright »

Image
but what's the name of the movie??
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1344 Post by domino harvey »

This is why we can't have nice things
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1345 Post by knives »

domino harvey wrote:It may well be, I have not seen it yet!
You'd be wise to continue that trajectory. It's like if The Informer replaced the good stuff with bad (or worse I guess) accents. The good thing is it's only about an hour long which is probably enough to keep it off the list.
User avatar
mteller
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1346 Post by mteller »

Caught can't be a Worst Film By A Great Director because Lola Montes, The Reckless Moment and Le Plaisir are all worse.

So there.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Olive Films

#1347 Post by swo17 »

If you're suggesting that all of those films are bad, then how does Ophuls still figure as a great director?
User avatar
mteller
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 pm

Re: Olive Films

#1348 Post by mteller »

You will note I didn't say they were bad, I said they were worse (than Caught). I don't think any of them are bad, and certainly not bad enough to discredit Ophuls as one of the greats.
User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 4:56 am

Re: Olive Films

#1349 Post by whaleallright »

challenging opinions!
User avatar
Black Hat
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:34 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Olive Films

#1350 Post by Black Hat »

The last page or so of this thread needs to be entered into this forum's annals of comedy. Good stuff. I don't know what it is about Lola Montes or Martine Carol but I can't get enough of both.
Post Reply