Flicker Alley

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
McCrutchy
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: East Coast, USA

Re: Flicker Alley

#576 Post by McCrutchy »

bdurden wrote:To address McCrutchy's post:
McCrutchy wrote:I haven't gotten round to my copy yet, but count me as another one perturbed by the yellow subtitles. And not to fan the flames, but I also thought we were past the lossy audio encodes as well. I realize full well that this is score for a silent film, but even with the long feature, they still had plenty of room for a lossless 2.0 track, and given the prices they charge, it's pretty lame that we're back to bog standard 192 kbps Dolby.
First, I'd like to address the yellow subtitles. This was an internal discussion that went on for a quite a while, and we eventually settled on yellow subtitles (not necessarily my personal preference), which was decided as it is more common among European releases and felt that was a bit more fitting, plus had more readability. However, we are taking into consideration moving to white subtitles for future projects, or possibly giving an option to change the subtitles to white.

Second, the audio track. This was another tough choice, as it was an option between doing a piano recording with a much better audio quality or using a beautiful live orchestral score by Timothy Brock which only recording we could find was at the Cinémathèque Française in 192kbps quality. As we all fell in love with how great the performance was, and how lively the 30 piece orchestra performed, we had to go with this recording.
Oh dear, I did not notice this post before, and my next post in this thread was unfortunately a complaint about the audio on Nanook of the North. It was only when reviewing the previous page that I saw and read the informative and helpful post from bdurden, and even though I'm months late, I just want to apologize for seeming not to acknowledge the response to my post about The Late Mathias Pascal. I can now appreciate the use of Dolby Digital on that release, since that was the only option for the score FA felt best. :)
User avatar
Ann Harding
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:26 am
Contact:

Re: Flicker Alley

#577 Post by Ann Harding »

Here is my review of the boxset (in French) with : Le Brasier ardent, Kean, Gribiche, Les Nouveaux messieurs.
[The Blu-ray of Feu Mathias Pascal had been previously reviewed by another person].
Lots of screencaps here.
User avatar
RobertB
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Flicker Alley

#578 Post by RobertB »

I recently bought both The Late Mathias Pacal and Nanook of the North and I enjoyed them both a lot. They book look like excellent examples of hands-off blu-ray treatment. Some scratches exist, but then so does the grain. Nanook has the feel of a must for libraries and schools. It's really packed with films about the far north, and gives a good idea of how both documentaries and attitudes to "exotic" people has changed over time.

Mathias Pascal I found very entertaining! Much more than L'Argent. Having a score that is recorded with a live audience seems like an unusual choice, but it didn't disturb me. Very seldom do you hear the audience, and they do laugh at the right moment. The film has both tinting and toning and the pale yellow subs actually go quite well with it! I have posted a photo at http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/195/yd9n.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. The tinting looks a bit redder on my pic than in the film, but the subtitle is about right. Some extras or a thicker booklet would have been nice, but I still recommend it highly.

I will not hesitate to blind-buy blu ray editions from Flicker in the future.
User avatar
krnash
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 6:50 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#579 Post by krnash »

captveg wrote:Cinerama Holiday and South Seas Adventure BD/DVD combo releases are up for pre-order. Release date in 10/22/13.
For those in the LA area, these are for sale at Arclight Hollywood and quite discounted at $24.
Stuart Galbraith IV
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:16 am

Re: Flicker Alley

#580 Post by Stuart Galbraith IV »

My review of CINERAMA HOLIDAY:

http://worldcinemaparadise.com/2013/12/ ... iday-1955/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#581 Post by Gregory »

I don't see anything about it anywhere else but according to FA's email newsletter, they're getting for a February release of the Wallace Worsley Hunchback of Notre Dame starring Lon Chaney.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Flicker Alley

#582 Post by swo17 »

On Blu-ray.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#583 Post by Gregory »

Yes. Might as well pass on all the details:
mastered from a multi-tinted 16mm print struck in 1926 from the original camera negative and represents the best condition in which this landmark films survives today. The edition includes a new symphonic score arranged by Donald Hunsberger.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#584 Post by EddieLarkin »

One of my most wanted silents (along with most of Chaney's work). Hopefully The Lost World won't be much longer.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Flicker Alley

#585 Post by Ashirg »

Hunchback is set to be released March 11, 2014. List Price: $44.95
Bonus materials include a long essay and an optional audio commentary by Chaney scholar Michael F. Blake, rare footage (in standard definition) of Chaney out of makeup on the Cathedral set, a 1913 film, Alas and Alack, in which Chaney plays a hunchback, and a dynamic HD photo gallery with over 50 original production and publicity stills.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#586 Post by HerrSchreck »

Duplicates the extras in the excellent old Image disc (with 3D glasses and extras, costing a fraction of this)-- don't necc vet that huge price tag, but whatever.

Nothing new here-- Blake did the commentary for that edition, so everything is a port it seems.

Image
Orlac
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:29 am

Re: Flicker Alley

#587 Post by Orlac »

That price is absurd.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#588 Post by HerrSchreck »

I'm certainly not disagreeing with you.
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#589 Post by tenia »

I'm about to pay at B&N.com a copy of Nanook of the North listed at $52. Fortunately, it's part of the B2G1 sale, but this is indeed completely absurd.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Flicker Alley

#590 Post by swo17 »

That one comes with six bonus films though.
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#591 Post by tenia »

I know it has loads of content to justify the price (it's already a 2-movie release anyway), but still, I find it pretty steep. I guess I'm getting used to $27.99 Criterion double features (like The Killing / Killer's Kiss).
User avatar
triodelover
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: The hills of East Tennessee

Re: Flicker Alley

#592 Post by triodelover »

FWIW, Hunchback is currently available for pre-order at Amazon for $29.99.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#593 Post by Gregory »

Still way too much, I think. I bought the Image "Ultimate Edition" (not my first DVD of this, incidentally) which had an SRP of $20 for what was a worthwhile restoration and cleanup at the time. What justifies an SRP of more than twice that now?
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#594 Post by captveg »

A far smaller Blu-ray market. We've been inching to niche laserdisc market for a number of years now.
User avatar
Minkin
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:13 am

Re: Flicker Alley

#595 Post by Minkin »

Gregory wrote:Still way too much, I think. I bought the Image "Ultimate Edition" (not my first DVD of this, incidentally) which had an SRP of $20 for what was a worthwhile restoration and cleanup at the time. What justifies an SRP of more than twice that now?
I might expect either MoC or the BFI to release this for about 1/4 of the price Flicker alley is asking. Seems this happens with most of their titles (most notable being the Chaplin at Keystone. Poor fellow whoever shelled out $80 for the Flicker Alley set vs the identical $15 BFI set - this overpricing is why I no longer buy any Flicker Alley titles).
Jonathan S
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:31 am
Location: Somerset, England

Re: Flicker Alley

#596 Post by Jonathan S »

Re. the non-film extras, the blu-ray of Hunchback won't even have the 3-D stills or the souvenir program in the printed form (which I much prefer) of the Image DVD issue:
David Shepard (on Nitrateville) wrote:HUNCHBACK will have both Michael Blake's commentary and his essay (in a brochure). We will not have the 3-D stills but are adding a gallery of more than 100 stills. The souvenir program will be on the disc rather than a printed insert.
(The official press release above refers to "over 50" stills.)
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#597 Post by Gregory »

captveg wrote:A far smaller Blu-ray market. We've been inching to niche laserdisc market for a number of years now.
It varies a lot from label to label. And what's generally true of Blu-ray vs. DVD is not as simple to apply to silent film, which was a small niche market all along (with the exception of a a few big titles). Out of all the masses that were buying DVDs but are not buying Blu-rays now, how many of them were buying Chaney silents? Also, the Image Hunchback DVD surely sold poorly among casual viewers, who would be likely to opt for the cheaper Alpha release or another PD release that claims "digitally remastered" on the cover.

Minkin makes a good observation about how UK releases are often less expensive than their North American counterparts. Yet the latter are made for a vastly larger market.
I also bought the BFI Chaplin at Keystone set for a mere £14 rather than $55 or $60 for the Flicker Alley counterpart, or whatever the price was at the time.
User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:28 pm

Re: Flicker Alley

#598 Post by captveg »

I too have wondered how the European markets can get more obscure titles more often. Maybe they do sell better despite a more varied market and lower populations per country?
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Flicker Alley

#599 Post by MichaelB »

A smaller market usually means that the rights cost less.
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Flicker Alley

#600 Post by perkizitore »

Lower distribution costs I guess, but maybe some companies are greedier than others?
Post Reply