5/71 Mother Joan of the Angels

Discuss releases by Second Run and the films on them
Message
Author
j99
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:18 pm

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#76 Post by j99 »

The screengrabs look fantastic. Really looking forward to it.
admira
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:33 pm

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#77 Post by admira »

http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDReview ... review.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#78 Post by jbeall »

Wow! The difference is night and day; absolutely worth a double-dip.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#79 Post by MichaelB »

Gary doesn't mention it in detail, but I can thoroughly recommend David Sorfa's new booklet essay - as with the transfer (in fact, even more so), it's night and day compared with the rather skimpy piece that accompanied the original release.

And with regard to the transfer, it's extraordinarily unlikely that Second Run would have gone to the expense (and the gamble) of reissuing it if the new master hadn't been a drastic improvement! But it's nice to see absolutely cast-iron side-by-side evidence.
User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#80 Post by manicsounds »

Are you happy with the screengrab of you, Michael?
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#81 Post by MichaelB »

manicsounds wrote:Are you happy with the screengrab of you, Michael?
I'm not really sure how to answer that, except to say that it's a perfectly fair representation of what the intro looks like (or at least one of the bits without film clips).
User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Greater Manchester

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#82 Post by TMDaines »

What tea were you drinking? I'm a Yorkshire Gold man myself.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#83 Post by MichaelB »

There wasn't anything in the mug - it was a prop designed to add a splash of colour.

I think we may have had lunch on that table shortly before filming started, though.
User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Greater Manchester

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#84 Post by TMDaines »

Wow, the magic has all gone.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#85 Post by MichaelB »

In fact, the whole thing was mocked up on one of the big soundstages at Pinewood.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#86 Post by swo17 »

I trust this will all be covered in the roundtable commentary on the intro.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#87 Post by domino harvey »

DVDBeaver's faulty screen capturing fails once again, as the mug is much brighter and more vibrant on the finished disc
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#88 Post by MichaelB »

domino harvey wrote:DVDBeaver's faulty screen capturing fails once again, as the mug is much brighter and more vibrant on the finished disc
Yes, they took ages to light it properly. In fact, they were so obsessive about getting that right that we ran out of time for the rest, so I just recorded a couple of hundred of the most frequently used words and a handful of syllables and Polish names and let them put it together in the editing room. They did an amazingly seamless job, all things considered.
User avatar
Bikey
Label Representative
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:09 am

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#89 Post by Bikey »

MichaelB wrote:In fact, the whole thing was mocked up on one of the big soundstages at Pinewood.
Such a big production and such hard work and yet no one has even noticed the stack visible in the right-hand corner of that frame?!
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#90 Post by MichaelB »

Bikey wrote:
MichaelB wrote:In fact, the whole thing was mocked up on one of the big soundstages at Pinewood.
Such a big production and such hard work and yet no one has even noticed the stack visible in the right-hand corner of that frame?!
To be fair, they're only going from that frame grab - they won't have seen the spectacular CGI bit in the middle when they suddenly leap up in the air and start whirling round my head.
User avatar
Bikey
Label Representative
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:09 am

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#91 Post by Bikey »

A wonderful new piece by Anthony Nield at The Quietus just in
User avatar
Bikey
Label Representative
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:09 am

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#92 Post by Bikey »

Full details of the release are now up at our website
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#93 Post by MichaelB »

...which reveals amongst other things that the new version has its own spine number: 71.
User avatar
Bikey
Label Representative
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:09 am

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#94 Post by Bikey »

"Could easily sit amongst the greatest films I've ever seen" - Michael Ewins at E-Film Blog
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#95 Post by MichaelB »

I love the way that I got blamed for the "subliminal marketing" and Second Run got let off the hook!

For the record, that wasn't my flat, those weren't my DVDs, and I'm nowhere near as convinced as he is that their presence on camera was accidental.
j99
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:18 pm

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#96 Post by j99 »

Bikey wrote: Such a big production and such hard work and yet no one has even noticed the stack visible in the right-hand corner of that frame?!
My eyes wandered over there after a few minutes after being dazzled by the multi-coloured mug. Can't actually remember whether there were a pile of CDs in there or not, but there was no chance of deciphering any of the titles anyway. Haven't watched the film in full yet, but delighted with the clips I saw in the intro. Looks like a superb restoration, and I hope my local library knows about this and replaces their old, decrepit version with the new one.
User avatar
Duncan Hopper
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:16 am
Location: http://www.eldiabolik.com
Contact:

Re: 5 Mother Joan of the Angels

#97 Post by Duncan Hopper »

MichaelB wrote:I love the way that I got blamed for the "subliminal marketing" and Second Run got let off the hook!

For the record, that wasn't my flat, those weren't my DVDs, and I'm nowhere near as convinced as he is that their presence on camera was accidental.

Its not the first time said DVD stack has appeared on film. Check the Peter Strickland's introduction to Szindbad.
McCrutchy
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: East Coast, USA

Re: 5/71 Mother Joan of the Angels

#98 Post by McCrutchy »

Second Run should make it like a game: Have the interviewee pick several of their favorite titles from the catalog, and place them in a stack in an only somewhat inconspicuous area of the camera range. :D
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5/71 Mother Joan of the Angels

#99 Post by MichaelB »

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 5/71 Mother Joan of the Angels

#100 Post by MichaelB »

The Arts Desk.

(Just to clarify, I didn't claim that Kawalerowicz specifically had seen Black Narcissus, just that it was possibly - indeed, probably - the only example of genuine nunsploitation that the Poles would have had a chance to have seen prior to Mother Joan: it was definitely released over there because there's a famous Polish poster by Henryk Tomaszewski.)
Post Reply