New Yorker

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Message
Author
User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
Location: Upstate NY

Re: New Yorker

#601 Post by Murdoch »

Yeah, I think it was just a VHS.
User avatar
John Edmond
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:35 am

Re: New Yorker

#602 Post by John Edmond »

And it's the same VHS master that will be used for the blu-ray, knowing New Yorker.
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: New Yorker

#603 Post by knives »

If Kino can change(ish) than hopefully these yahoos can too.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#604 Post by Michael Kerpan »

New Yorker WAS working very diligently on Celine and Julie -- prior to its time of troubles. The intention was to do a first-rate DVD release. Has NYer done any blu-ray releases yet?
User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:58 pm
Location: Northwest US

Re: New Yorker

#605 Post by Brian C »

If they're doing the work for a theatrical reissue then certainly the Blu should be decent also...?
User avatar
John Edmond
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:35 am

Re: New Yorker

#606 Post by John Edmond »

Oh I'm just jibing. But I didn't start giving Kino the benefit of the doubt until after 10 or so great blu-rays.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: New Yorker

#607 Post by Gregory »

I remember them announcing the DVD a long time ago and then dropping the ball with it more than once after the announcement. I never heard any specific information about them working "diligently" on it before the reorganization, nor that the intention was to do a "first-rate" DVD. Very few of their other releases could be called that. Of course it's always possible Michael heard something I didn't.
Brian C wrote:If they're doing the work for a theatrical reissue then certainly the Blu should be decent also...?
I don't see any necessary connection there. They've long done theatrical and video distribution for the same films and the latter releases have usually been disappointing.
This will be the first release of its kind from "New New Yorker," so hard to predict what will happen.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: New Yorker

#608 Post by domino harvey »

I think they paid to fly Rosenbaum to France for a bonus feature, didn't they? Maybe he's referring to that
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#609 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Speaking of Rosenbaum, has he commented on this upcoming edition?
User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: New Yorker

#610 Post by Peacock »

NYer are most likely to fall down on something like yellow subs, MPEG-2, forced subs, small file size, no uncompressed sound etc.... Fingers crossed it'll be good though... doesn't look like BFI are interested in upgrading it anyway.
Ted Todorov
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:00 pm

Re: New Yorker

#611 Post by Ted Todorov »

Anyone know who got the Eustache rights? NYer no longer lists any of his movies in their website catalog.

As to the coming Celine & Julie Blu-ray, we can only hope, but considering NYers hotmail.com email address from the previous page of this thread, I caution caution.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#612 Post by Michael Kerpan »

From what I recall, the NYer DVD version of Celine and Julie seemed like it would be an upgrade over the UK release. It was going to be based on the same transfer as the French DVD (which was superior) and have considerable more in the way of extras. As to a future Blu-Ray, also keeping my fingers crossed.

And -- Oh for a nice Blu-Ray of Pont du Nord!
Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm

Re: New Yorker

#613 Post by Perkins Cobb »

Michael Kerpan wrote:It was going to be based on the same transfer as the French DVD (which was superior)
So we're pinning our hopes on New Yorker getting a PAL->NTSC transfer right. Um....
stroszeck
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am

Re: New Yorker

#614 Post by stroszeck »

You'd think that over the course of the past several years with Criterion's reputation becoming so great that even many average movie enthusiasts go to it as a source of "alternative" movies, that companies like New Yorker, Koch and even Facets would kick up their game and produce higher quality stuff. Less than a decade ago Criterion was releasing single disc editions of hard to find stuff but today they get their own racks in major B&M stores. You'd think these companies would improve the quality of their output if only to attract more customers and $$$.
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#615 Post by Michael Kerpan »

Perkins Cobb wrote:So we're pinning our hopes on New Yorker getting a PAL->NTSC transfer right. Um....
No current info on what is being done now vis a vis transfers. Not sure what (if anything) might be going on with regards to any France-originating HD transfer. Just providing some purely historical data. ;~}

But given a choice of a transfer based on the BFI material and one based on the French material, I'd definitely go for the latter. Obviously a nice new HD transfer would be preferable to either.
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: New Yorker

#616 Post by perkizitore »

stroszeck wrote:You'd think that over the course of the past several years with Criterion's reputation becoming so great that even many average movie enthusiasts go to it as a source of "alternative" movies, that companies like New Yorker, Koch and even Facets would kick up their game and produce higher quality stuff. Less than a decade ago Criterion was releasing single disc editions of hard to find stuff but today they get their own racks in major B&M stores. You'd think these companies would improve the quality of their output if only to attract more customers and $$$.
Kino stepped up their game, but you should compare Facets with Second Run and NOT Criterion, since they release mainly obscure films.
Last edited by perkizitore on Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
sidehacker
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#617 Post by sidehacker »

Michael Kerpan wrote:
And -- Oh for a nice Blu-Ray of Pont du Nord!
Oh man, imagine the grain in that release.
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: New Yorker

#618 Post by jbeall »

perkizitore wrote:
stroszeck wrote:You'd think that over the course of the past several years with Criterion's reputation becoming so great that even many average movie enthusiasts go to it as a source of "alternative" movies, that companies like New Yorker, Koch and even Facets would kick up their game and produce higher quality stuff. Less than a decade ago Criterion was releasing single disc editions of hard to find stuff but today they get their own racks in major B&M stores. You'd think these companies would improve the quality of their output if only to attract more customers and $$$.
Kino stepped up their game, but Facets should compare themselves with Second Run and NOT Criterion, since they release mainly obscure films.
Facets has gotten marginally better, especially for those of us who remember atrocities like their releases of The Joke and Daisies. At least now the subs aren't scrolling! But Facets on their best day is still miles below Criterion or even Second Run on their worst.
User avatar
Dadapass
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:57 pm

Re: New Yorker

#619 Post by Dadapass »

Moses and Aaron apparently won best special features alongside The Devils(BFI) and Godzilla(Criterion) at Il Cinema Ritrovato DVD Awards. The special features are “Introduction to Arnold Schoenberg’s Accompaniment to a Cinematographic Scene” (1969), a short film by the directors, Optional English subtitles, and a 40-page booklet containing the libretto in German and English, and 2 essays by Michael Gallope and Allen Shawn (English only). The New Yorker Films' page doesn't include the two essays but I've seen it mentioned elsewhere.
Can anyone who has the dvd comment on the image. I can't seem to find any decent reviews of the disc.
User avatar
ShellOilJunior
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:17 am

Re: New Yorker

#620 Post by ShellOilJunior »

Dadapass wrote:Not sure if this has been mentioned but New Yorker Films will release Celine and Julie Go Boating on Blu-ray Spring 2012.
Close to a year later and no sign of a release.

So it goes...
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: New Yorker

#621 Post by swo17 »

It's been close to a year since the spring of 2012?
User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: New Yorker

#622 Post by Michael Kerpan »

swo17 wrote:It's been close to a year since the spring of 2012?
Well, it is getting close to the end of SUMMER 2012. ;~}
User avatar
med
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:58 pm

Re: New Yorker

#623 Post by med »

It's had some screenings in the past couple months, too, so it's not as if there's been nothing happening.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: New Yorker

#624 Post by swo17 »

New Yorker on Facebook 5/9/12 wrote:It's in the works--no release date set at present, though. Probably between Oct. and Dec. this year.
User avatar
ShellOilJunior
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:17 am

Re: New Yorker

#625 Post by ShellOilJunior »

swo17 wrote:It's been close to a year since the spring of 2012?
A simple formula in Excel says 306 days. I say that's close to a year.

=TODAY()-Announced Date

Image
Post Reply