No it doesn't - no amount of time or money will get a pristine high-definition picture out of a badly scratched 16mm dupe, because the source information just isn't there.Norbie wrote:It just comes down to time and money i guess.
For much the same reason, the BFI's restoration of the 1903 Alice in Wonderland (viewable here) is riddled with severe physical and chemical damage to such an extent that some of the YouTube commentators have expressed scepticism that it's actually a restoration at all.
But in both cases, the restorers have done the best that they possibly could. In fact, I'm absolutely astounded by what the Metropolis team have been able to extract from that footage.
