Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Message
Author
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#51 Post by HerrSchreck »

Michael wrote:Suspiria has been called "Snow White in Hell". I think all the cheesiness and the messiness are intended as they offer much surreal beauty to the fantastical ballet school world. Of course the acting from the cast except Jessica Harper is over-the-top cheesy while only Jessica is quite real and decent. Jessica is drugged and dances through the technicolor nightmare and of course everything's supposed to look way off, animated and messy. One of the most luxuriously photographed films ever made, how they shot the witches' shoes clapping on the wood floor through the red/blue glow. What about the swimming pool? The blood red-lit curtains in the gym?

Geez, Narshty and Schreck, lubricate your eyes!
Sorry my friend. I can't even get past the first half hour, and I've tried a few times. I swear I want to like this film. Beautiful cinematography just isn't enough for me. In fact I would have gladly traded the visual tour de force for a more functional mise en scene.

I think you'll agree that in terms of execution prince Bava kicks this stuff around the room?
User avatar
tryavna
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

#52 Post by tryavna »

colinr0380 wrote:(Herr Schreck, have you tried any of Lucio Fulci's films yet? Fulci in a way managed to turn being a second-tier director into an art form - for example by cashing in on Dawn of The Dead with Zombi 2 - because he took second hand film concepts and set pieces and did them in his own style. The Beyond contains a similar 'blind person's dog turning on its owner' sequence and indeed contains a similar kind of nonsensical world as the Argento film, yet it is done with a relatively straight-ahead narrative, which strangely makes the film's set pieces when they come feel even more bizarre and off kilter than Suspiria! I'd certainly recommend checking out The Beyond though for some amazing sequences such as the main character replaying the footsteps of a person running out in their mind to realise they didn't make a sound and are therefore a ghost, or the final sequence. Plus it features the lovely Catriona MacColl which more than makes up for the set pieces that don't come off such as the drawn out spider attack and the various Fulci trademarked eye violence scenes!)
I've only seen two Fulci films (Beatrice Cenci and Don't Torture a Duckling), but he strikes me as far more gifted director than Argento -- and seems to have a great deal more to say. Argento's films seem absolutely content-less to me -- though I have to say that I find the opening murder in Suspiria to be quite brutal and disturbing.

The horror directors I find myself drawn to seem to possess a humanism that undercuts the horrors we as viewers are being asked to take vicarious delight in. At least, that's why I suppose I can count Mario Bava and Terence Fisher among my favorite directors of their era and yet am left totally cold by other alleged "masters" of the genre, like Argento.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#53 Post by colinr0380 »

tryavna wrote:I've only seen two Fulci films (Beatrice Cenci and Don't Torture a Duckling), but he strikes me as far more gifted director than Argento -- and seems to have a great deal more to say. Argento's films seem absolutely content-less to me -- though I have to say that I find the opening murder in Suspiria to be quite brutal and disturbing.

The horror directors I find myself drawn to seem to possess a humanism that undercuts the horrors we as viewers are being asked to take vicarious delight in. At least, that's why I suppose I can count Mario Bava and Terence Fisher among my favorite directors of their era and yet am left totally cold by other alleged "masters" of the genre, like Argento.
I'd warn you off from Fulci's New York Ripper then - that takes an extreme anti-humanity approach even for a serial killer film!

Stephen Thrower's Beyond Terror book is a fascinating read - I'd really like to get a chance to see the two White Fang films Fulci did with Franco Nero. Thrower tracks Fulci's decline from post New York Ripper and Manhattan Baby into rather lacklustre retreads of his more celebrated horrors with diminishing returns with the nadir probably being the disastrous Zombi 3 (or Zombie Flesh-Eaters 2!) in 1988.

(Though I should admit to being curious to see Cat In The Brain - apparently a strange kind of mash up of biography, psychological gore thriller and greatest hits compliation with Fulci playing himself as a horror director worried his life is mirroring his films - and what he got up to with John Savage in Door To Silence!)

Kim Newman and Alan Jones on the Bird With The Crystal Plumage commentary talk about there apparently being some animosity between Argento and Fulci because Argento felt that Fulci was trying to copy his style. According to Jones he couldn't mention Fulci's name to Argento without him getting angry - but luckily they seemed to patch things up and were in the process of working together just before Fulci died in 1996.
User avatar
A
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:41 pm

#54 Post by A »

A masterpiece, and so far my favorite Argento. But if you want to go for sheer visual brilliance, his follow-up in the "Mothers" trilogy, Inferno (1979), is even more recommended. Clearly influenced by Bava, who also directed a short segment of it.

As for Argento not possessing any humanism? Are you kidding me??? This is like saying Antonioni didn't possess any humanism... #-o

You should definitely watch the whole of Suspiria, and maybe his "Phantom of the Opera" (1998) which shows lots of humanism and boasts an incredibly ambivalent ending (though the film has been extremely butchered by its producers).

Argento is a lot about perceiving the world, and how impossible it is to find the "right" point of view (in terms of "truth"). I find his films incredibly rich and intellectually stimulating, and they tend to get better and better on repeated viewings. And again, to me saying Argento has no humanism sounds like saying King Hu's films are devoid of spirituality. :wink:
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#55 Post by perkizitore »

DVDTimes on the UK blu-ray
Is it worth waiting for a US release? I am not hoping for a better transfer, but maybe they include more extras and the Italian dub (Although i prefer the English version, it would be nice having this)
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#56 Post by James »

perkizitore wrote:DVDTimes on the UK blu-ray
Is it worth waiting for a US release?
Yes, if only because the distributor literally calls Suspiria "trash".
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#57 Post by tenia »

Wow.
Seems there's gonna have the same polemic we had in France.

Looks like the colorimetry has gone away again. Thanks Dario for changing your whole movie and turning it into a night club. =D>
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re:

#58 Post by R0lf »

A wrote:You should definitely watch the whole of Suspiria, and maybe his "Phantom of the Opera" (1998) which shows lots of humanism and boasts an incredibly ambivalent ending (though the film has been extremely butchered by its producers).
Was Phantom butchered? I know my version does not include a bath house scene but were there many compromises on the overall cut of the film?
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#59 Post by MichaelB »

James wrote:
perkizitore wrote:DVDTimes on the UK blu-ray
Is it worth waiting for a US release?
Yes, if only because the distributor literally calls Suspiria "trash".
Ghastly cover art aside (and I've just filed a review with Sight & Sound that ends "Whoever sanctioned the patronising 'Taking Trash Seriously' neon-effect logo to highlight the label's Cine Excess sub-brand should be unceremoniously dumped in a room full of razor wire and pelted with maggots."), the new UK release isn't half bad.

The commentary is great fun, combining tons of information (Alan Jones and Kim Newman are about as safe as hands can be in this territory) with lively banter about the film's less successful elements (they burst out laughing at the scene where Miguel Bose pretends to be a gifted ballet student, for instance). That covers the anecdotal basics, while the accompanying documentary is far more inclined towards serious critical analysis than is the norm for this genre, with contributions from Argento, Claudio Simonetti, Kim Newman (again), academic Patricia McCormack and director/fan Norman J.Warren, all of whom bring helpfully diverse perspectives. The interviews with Simonetti, McCormack and Warren are also presented separately in much longer versions, though with the inevitable by-product of a fair bit of deja vu if you've already watched the documentary.

Put it like this: I have a review copy of the final production DVD... but I'm buying the Blu-ray.
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#60 Post by HarryLong »

(they burst out laughing at the scene where Miguel Bose pretends to be a gifted ballet student, for instance)
But is this any less ludicrous that Jessica Harper as a gifted dance student?
Ever see PHANTOM OF THE PARADISE?
broadwayrock
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:47 pm

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#61 Post by broadwayrock »

Michael Mackenzie does exhaustive breakdown of the new UK blu-ray.

Pros:
Great extras and a new 5:1 mix that contains music/sound effects that were missing from the Anchor Bay dvd 5:1 mix.

Cons:
Picture suffers from some very overblown highlights.
User avatar
perkizitore
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:29 pm
Location: OOP is the only answer

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#62 Post by perkizitore »

I knew i shouldn't buy the UK blu-ray, there is a new transfer! :x
broadwayrock
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 1:47 pm

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#63 Post by broadwayrock »

I'm pretty sure that 'new HD transfer' mentioned in the American Cinematographer article is the same transfer that's used in the UK/Italian Blu-rays.

Unless the Weinsteins are willing to pay for a new master, the US blu-ray will use the same one.
User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:43 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#64 Post by mfunk9786 »

Let's just hope there IS a release in the states, it'd frankly shock me if there was.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#65 Post by Matt »

There might be hope: TWC and Dimension titles are now going to be distributed on DVD and Blu-ray by Sony. Let's hope the Weinsteins release Suspiria on Blu-ray before they run out of money again. If the remake gets released this year, the tie-in opportunity will be all the impetus they need to get the original out there.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#66 Post by colinr0380 »

I did get the Nouveaux Pictures disc of Suspiria, on DVD rather than Blu-ray due to the issues discussed above with the overblown picture, which was very noticeably over brightened from previous versions of the film that I've seen even to my untrained eyes (hopefully one day there'll be a version that combines the best picture with the best soundtrack, but we'll probably have to wait for whoever 'remasters' the film next). All was not lost however since I mostly picked the disc up for the commentary which was up to the usual standards of Alan Jones and Kim Newman - I especially liked the idea of Argento having an interesting Antonioni influence that is mentioned again here after being initially put forward during their Bird With The Crystal Plumage commentary. It is a fascinating influence to think about as rather privileged, alienated from society characters wander around their hyper-composed environments that, in a way, end up doing their emoting for them. Perhaps Argento simplifys the angst expressed somewhat, giving the characters much more defined and accessible hero and villain roles (while simultaneously spinning off into bizarre, theatrical and supernatural regions) than in Antonioni, and in Agento the characters express perhaps simpler emotions of mounting dread and terror than simply existential ennui and lack of purpose, though the sense of drifting to the films feels similar.

I also rewatched Inferno again while this Antonioni connection was still playing on my mind, and I found that very early sequence of moving from the image of the sinister building where the action will take place in a book, to a larger though still monochrome picture on the wall, to the full gaudily coloured building itself, to perhaps be a similar technique to the one used in the darkroom sequence of Blow Up. The moment occurs at about the three minute point of this video.

On the idea of 'mounting dread', I think that is perhaps what can sometimes feel anti-climactic about Suspiria and Inferno - I see many of the sequences of both films as extended digressions, playing out a situation from a particular wandering character's point of view as they accumulate clues or knowledge about their predicament until they reach a literal dead end. There is a strange sense in which knowledge, learning and a general sense of awareness of your surroundings and their true meaning is the cause of the character's deaths - that inquisitiveness is somehow fatal. Or maybe that learning, but not immediately putting that knowledge to purposeful use, is the cause of the character's downfalls? (This is perhaps modified in the early sections of Inferno to become the way that the initial letter drags in a series of characters who would otherwise have remained safely ignorant to their deaths) Perhaps that is why Suzy Bannion as the ostensible protagonist of Suspiria, has her investigations confined to the final sections of the film, and the way that her (albeit very slow during the early sections of the film!) dawning awareness is at the same time combined with her entry into the inner sanctum to bring down the coven.

For the film itself perhaps the reason why the murders feel anti-climactic is that it can seem as if the filmmakers have reached a dead end - that they have exhausted all possible methods to stretch out the tension any longer and therefore have to, rather sadly, kill off the character we have been following and start afresh with another to cover similar but different looking territory (There is perhaps a Psycho influence, as well as an Antonioni one, there in getting rid of one character to shift focus to exploring another)

I also noticed from the Cine Excess advert on the disc that this 'taking tash seriously' label is going to bring out editions of The House With Laughing Windows, a modern film called Viva which I don't know anything about but which looks sort of psychadelic from the clip on the disc, and a series of ten "chosen by Roger Corman himself" films, mentioning The Big Bird Cage, Big Bad Mama and Grand Theft Auto. They are apparently also going to release Amsterdamned - a serial killer film that I remember catching part of on late night television ages ago (in a double bill with Puppet On A Chain, which conveniently featured a speedboat chase through Amsterdam canals) and would quite like to see again. It was made by the chap who had previously made the horror film The Lift, which he later remade in the US as The Shaft with Naomi Watts the same year she was in Mulholland Drive.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#67 Post by Mr Sausage »

colin wrote:There is a strange sense in which knowledge, learning and a general sense of awareness of your surroundings and their true meaning is the cause of the character's deaths - that inquisitiveness is somehow fatal.
Inferno is certainly the only movie I know of where someone is murdered just for trying to borrow a book from the library. (Brilliant analysis, by the way).

Thinking on it, I believe this aspect of Argento's supernatural films is a direct result of the murder-mystery aspect of giallo (Suspiria and Inferno are giallo with supernatural overtones) in which, obviously, there is a secret meaning behind the inexplicable actions of the movie's first half which the hero must uncover, indeed is often compelled against his common sense to uncover. But Argento's supernatural films extend this idea so that it is society--even the world itself--which hides some secret, awful meaning that is accidently uncovered by certain unwitting people. Unlike the hero of a straight giallo, the hero of the supernatural films is put in a position that their knowledge, which is always gained accidently and seems rather to pursue them than vice versa (both Suzy and Mark are not the prime investigators of the mystery, but have instead some sort of relationship with a person who is, before taking it up in the third act), does not restore order to the narrative. On the contrary, it opens up a further abyss of evil and confusion which seems too large in its implications to be overcome, and the narrative always ends with a kind of apocalypse of destruction rather than a return to unity. Nevertheless, we see in the giallo that the more knowledge the characters gain, the more they grab the attention of the madman and become, along with their friends and loved ones, a target. In a giallo, the people helping investigate the murders usually die, with the exception of the hero. That theme is picked up in Inferno and Suspiria, but with the change I've noted that the central character is inexorably sucked by someone else's search for knowledge into a mystery they have no interest in solving, and whose solution does not--cannot--ultimately set the world right and restore the original balance. Any relevation just posits an even more disturbing layer underneath reality that still lurks even when a specific physical manifestation of evil is vanquished.

This is something H.P. Lovecraft (tho' he is not a writer I'm fond of) liked playing with, the old Biblical assertion that some things, some machinations of the Universe just should not be known to man--although in Lovecraft's case that is because anyone who does courts the madness of realizing the fightening, cosmological extent of one's own ignorance and limitations.
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#68 Post by colinr0380 »

This may be pushing the idea a bit, but the tone also seems similar to the later Japanese films like Ring and Pulse (even a lesser film like One Missed Call), where just slightly becoming aware of a hidden mystery leads the main characters to become cursed with an impending death, forcing them into having to investigate further and dive deeper into lore than they would have otherwise, with no guarantee that just the act of working out the mystery will actually save them in the end.
I believe this aspect of Argento's supernatural films is a direct result of the murder-mystery aspect of giallo
That's interesting - in the commentary Jones and Newman mention that it feels like the previous Argento films were building up to Suspiria, especially Deep Red which features many supernatural tinged aspects (the medium whose visions, necessitating her murder, sets the plot in motion in particular) before eventually boiling down to being a flesh and blood killer, sort of a last hesitation before taking the plunge into full horror fantasy in the next film. Again from the commentary Jones mentions that Daria Nicolodi was a big influence in pushing Dario into these more fantastical areas.

Also I was struck hearing comments about Argento having initially wanted to make the film with actual children rather than late teens and early 20s actresses (and the pointing out of the way the door handles are placed high up to make the actresses seem smaller and more childish), that Lucile Hadzihalilovic's film Innocence would make a good double bill with Suspiria.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#69 Post by Mr Sausage »

colinr0380 wrote:This may be pushing the idea a bit, but the tone also seems similar to the later Japanese films like Ring and Pulse, where just slightly becoming aware of a hidden mystery leads the main characters to become cursed with an impending death, forcing them into having to investigate further and dive deeper into lore than they would have otherwise, with no guarantee that just the act of working out the mystery will actually save them in the end.
I think those movies may indeed be doing very similar things, and it'd be worth pursuing (with the caveat that, in Pulse at least, the revelation is that there is no revelation, nothing behind the veil, just a continuation of the same loneliness and meaninglessness of the current world--a knowledge which induces in people paralysis and eventual dissolution altogether. Unlike Inferno, Pulse seems to say there isn't even evil behind the world's misery, not even a hell to go to at the end of it all. To invoke a writer better than Lovecraft: the people in Pulse seem to kill themselves for the same reason Quinton Compson kills himself in Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury: because in the completely relative world-philosophy Quinton's father bequeathed him, there is no ultimate meaning to be had from any of the good or bad things that happen in the world. Everything is ultimately empty and nihilistic. And Quinton spends much of his section of the novel wishing there was at least a hell one could go to).
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#70 Post by colinr0380 »

This is off topic of Suspiria but your comments on Pulse inspired me! It has been a while since I last saw the film so I may not be correct in this interpretation but I have a slightly less dark take on Pulse, feeling that along with the tackling of depression, loss and futility that there is also a wryly funny comment on immigration and even assimilation (as characters commit suicide only to be reborn as immortal ghosts) contained in there too which helps to make death not exactly the end - the horrifying aspect comes from the world becoming a sort of purgatory with all these growing 'ghetto' areas of ghosts that are unihabitable for the living. That sort of hints at the unstated problem of the film, and modern society in general, being what to do with all these now 'useless' people (who when they were safely dead and buried used to be out of sight and out of mind) now being back and taking up valuable space! So to me, while I agree that the film feels nihilistic at the end, it only feels so in the short term because the characters at the end of the film haven't yet found out a way to successfully co-exist (and on a personal level our lead character in losing her boyfriend faces the bigger question of whether she may possibly 'convert' to be with him again), at the same time as being unable to ignore the magnitude of the situation any longer.
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#71 Post by Morbii »

colinr0380 wrote:This is off topic of Suspiria but your comments on Pulse inspired me! It has been a while since I last saw the film so I may not be correct in this interpretation but I have a slightly less dark take on Pulse, feeling that along with the tackling of depression, loss and futility that there is also a wryly funny comment on immigration and even assimilation (as characters commit suicide only to be reborn as immortal ghosts)
Interesting conversation, guys. Argento is one of my favorite directors and I think you have some good thoughts. Please carry on, but I just wanted to point out something about this last comment (as Pulse is also one of my favorite horror films): I never thought of it as the characters becoming immortal ghosts once the commit "suicide" - my take on it was that the ghosts had figured out a way to make humans immortal so they couldn't join the ghost world as it was full (as one character postulated). The became literally "trapped in their loneliness" (as stains on the ground, wall, etc) and were left immortal and "alive". Now, it may still be a comment on immigration and assimilation, but the meaning may differ from what you were initially saying if you feel the same as I as to what was going on.
User avatar
Mr Sausage
Has Risen from the Grave
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
Location: Canada

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#72 Post by Mr Sausage »

colinr0380 wrote:This is off topic of Suspiria but your comments on Pulse inspired me! It has been a while since I last saw the film so I may not be correct in this interpretation but I have a slightly less dark take on Pulse, feeling that along with the tackling of depression, loss and futility that there is also a wryly funny comment on immigration and even assimilation (as characters commit suicide only to be reborn as immortal ghosts) contained in there too which helps to make death not exactly the end - the horrifying aspect comes from the world becoming a sort of purgatory with all these growing 'ghetto' areas of ghosts that are unihabitable for the living. That sort of hints at the unstated problem of the film, and modern society in general, being what to do with all these now 'useless' people (who when they were safely dead and buried used to be out of sight and out of mind) now being back and taking up valuable space! So to me, while I agree that the film feels nihilistic at the end, it only feels so in the short term because the characters at the end of the film haven't yet found out a way to successfully co-exist (and on a personal level our lead character in losing her boyfriend faces the bigger question of whether she may possibly 'convert' to be with him again), at the same time as being unable to ignore the magnitude of the situation any longer.
And now you've inspired me to watch Pulse again. I suspect that the movie accepts both of our readings simutaneously, or at least does not place them in opposition to each other. One of the astonishing things about K. Kurosawa's best movies is their steady expansion from their very specific and limited beginnings until, at the end, they come to contain everything. Since the issues in Pulse, especially, encompass the entire physical world, to say nothing of the spiritual, both of our readings may be equally applicable (not to say I wouldn't be converted). A reading like yours simply wouldn't occur to me (on my own, anyway) because of my general disinterest in political issues, but I would guess there is a genuine ambiguity in the film between a very real sense of purposelessness and a mordant sense of assimilation and accomodation. Who knows (and Morbii has managed to complicate the issue even further!).
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#73 Post by colinr0380 »

Perhaps the most significant way that Pulse relates to a film like Ring or even back to Suspiria/Inferno and Lovecraft is the way that the initial outbreak is transmitted through information, learning planting ideas that would otherwise have never been considered and knowledge literally leading to depression and despair and a wish maybe to unsee (or unknow) and return to an unattainable state of ignorance - though Pulse uses the internet as a medium instead of a musty and mysterious book and the deaths come from within rather than from an outside attacker (I would maybe argue that the encounters the characters have with the ghosts is less a conscious malevolent cursing than a transmission of a 'disease of futility').
Morbii wrote:I never thought of it as the characters becoming immortal ghosts once the commit "suicide" - my take on it was that the ghosts had figured out a way to make humans immortal so they couldn't join the ghost world as it was full (as one character postulated). The became literally "trapped in their loneliness" (as stains on the ground, wall, etc) and were left immortal and "alive".
I think you are right Morbii, I think I overstated (and oversimplified!) the situation too much. I guess that brings up issues of rootlessness, and of not being accepted in either the world you have left or allowed into the next world, but instead left in a short-termist limbo state reliving your last moments over and over unable to move back or forward from that moment (which is incidentally a moment which is infectious in its despair to any living person who may happen to notice), something which can be read validly supernaturally, politically and personally.
Spoiler
In a sense the end of Pulse suggests that the living have themselves been forced into this rootless existence too, driven from the overpopulated land and left homeless. Yet there is a small glimmer of hope that the ship is captained by the ever dependable and kindly figure of Koji Yakusho! I sort of get the same feeling from it as I did from the end of Children of Men - overwhelming bleakness and loss but with the slightest glimmer of fragile hope for the future.
EDIT (14th March): The US remake of Pulse, while deeply flawed, is actually one of the most tellingly fascinating of all the recent cycle of horror remakes for the way in which it has been reinterpreted to fit into a different culture. It is almost a negative image version of the Kurosawa film in which the ghosts truly are malevolent soul sucking beasts, which have been alerted to our presence through the 'evil' medium of the internet and radio wave research, turning the characters from generic vacuously happy teen pin-up stereotypes into hollowed out zombies before their dissolution (A comment on the use of drugs to control depression resulting in almost bipolar on/off extremes of emotions? Or about interchangeable young characters from teen horror films? Or just an unintended consequence of remaking in the US with a mostly gorgeous, highly trained and polished group of young professional actors?); the red room element is reversed with the living panicily sealing themselves into their rooms from the forbidden areas outside, rather than the other way around; and eventually the characters are not forced out of the country but instead to the heartland of it, the regions where they are out of the range of electronic signals, yet also the areas of far right underground militias. For those reasons the US remake feels isolationist while the original is more assimilationist in outlook, as well as stuck in the attitude of trying to make war with or somehow defeat the ghosts compared to the absolute irrelevance of such an attempt even being considered in the Kurosawa film. I actually find the remake far bleaker and more despairingly futile to watch as a viewer in its rather hollow attempts at winning its manufactured war (very Terminator-esque in its own way).
Last edited by colinr0380 on Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#74 Post by Morbii »

Well said, colin.
User avatar
R0lf
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 11:25 am

Re: Suspiria (Dario Argento, 1977)

#75 Post by R0lf »

Argento has said that Inferno is about alchemy. When you think about the first scene in Inferno where Rose is reading The Three Mothers book there are three objects on the table (pen, keys and letter opener) and the book tells her that there are three keys to identify the mothers. Each object is then involved in revealing a separate key. She uses the pen to write a letter, which she then posts identifying the smell, then again later Sarah uses the same letter to identify the same smell in Rome. When Rose investigates the basement she drops the keys that were on the table into the hole which reveals the second key. Later in the movie when Mark discovers the third key he uses the letter opener that was on the table in the first scene as well.

Though going on the continuity established in The Third Mother the library that Sara visits in Rome wasn't actually the house of the mother of tears?
Post Reply