Stanley Kubrick

Discuss individual directors, actors, cinematographers, writers, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#251 Post by Antoine Doinel »

A summary of Jan Harlan's panel at SXSW, moderated by Elvis Mitchell.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#252 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Watch Day Of The Fight here.
Wittsdream
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:00 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#253 Post by Wittsdream »

Antoine Doinel wrote:A summary of Jan Harlan's panel at SXSW, moderated by Elvis Mitchell.
Thanks for the link! After reading the article, it confirmed what I'd heard back in the first week of March, 1999 about the way Stanley felt towards EWS, and where it stood in his own oeuvre.

On the heels of the recent announcement that Pacino is set to play the part of Napoleon in the upcoming Disney movie "Betsy and the Emperor," it made me think of the tantalizing question: if the Kubrick Estate (Christiane, Jan, and the daughters) agreed to allow someone to direct Stanley's script of "Napoleon," which director do you think would be ideally suited to take on the project, and in what format (5 part cable/television serial, or 4 hour-long theatrical presentation)? And, who would you like to see in the lead role?

My nominees for director: Polanski, Malick, Scott, Bertolucci, Twyker, Sokurov.
My nominees for actor: English language: Rockwell, Northam, Phoenix; French: Amalric, Duris

Note: If Stanley had made this film between FMJ and EWS, I think Gary Oldman would have been the ideal Napoleon, a better choice than either Hemmings, Pacino or Nicholson in the 70's.
Last edited by Wittsdream on Sat May 09, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
FerdinandGriffon
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:16 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#254 Post by FerdinandGriffon »

I could see Weir at the helm... the idea of Amalric playing Napoleon is almost too much beauty for me to bear.
User avatar
psufootball07
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:52 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#255 Post by psufootball07 »

Just wondering because Amazon lists The Killing DVD as being released in 1999, should I pick it up, or is another release likely to come soon?
User avatar
kaujot
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Austin
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#256 Post by kaujot »

I don't think it's very likely, but the current Killing DVD is just fine, albeit barebones.
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#257 Post by HarryLong »

A summary of Jan Harlan's panel at SXSW, moderated by Elvis Mitchell.
I'm trying to figure out how pornography would have been worked into AI ... graphic depictions of Gigolo Joe's activities ...?
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#258 Post by Antoine Doinel »

I believe Kubrick's original plan for the Rouge City was something far more risque than what ended up on screen.
User avatar
stereo
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:06 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#259 Post by stereo »

I imagine... Eyes Wide Shut orgy with robots.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#260 Post by Antoine Doinel »

How Dr. Strangelove was adapted from the novel to the film.
ivuernis
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:35 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#261 Post by ivuernis »

HarryLong wrote:
A summary of Jan Harlan's panel at SXSW, moderated by Elvis Mitchell.
I'm trying to figure out how pornography would have been worked into AI ... graphic depictions of Gigolo Joe's activities ...?
Here's what the nihilists at Ruthless Reviews had to say on the subject.
HarryLong
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#262 Post by HarryLong »

Here's what the nihilists at Ruthless Reviews had to say on the subject.
Whole lotta supposition goin' on there.
Not to mention complete cluelessness regarding the children's stories that inform A.I.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#263 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Editor Anthony Harvey talks about the lost pie fight ending to Dr. Strangelove.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#264 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

I saw the documentary that Jan Harlan did on TCM last week. Does anyone know what that piece of music was at the end? It was absolutely stunning.
User avatar
kinjitsu
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
Location: Uffa!

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#265 Post by kinjitsu »

If you're referring to the music over the end titles, it's Women of Ireland by The Chieftains from Barry Lyndon, but it's not the one on the OST, which is much better.
Wittsdream
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:00 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#266 Post by Wittsdream »

Kubrick's family, spearheaded by the efforts of Jan Harlan, is shopping around the "Aryan Papers" script to Hollywood. Apparently, Warner Independent Pictures (a subsidiary of parent company Warner Bros.) secured the rights to Louis Begley's novel "Wartime Lies" - upon which Kubrick adapted his own version in the early 1990's - back in 2005, with "The Departed" screenwriter William Monahan commissioned to pen his own adaptation of the book.

In the right hands, I wouldn't mind seeing Kubrick's script make it into production.

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... FORM=ZZNR3
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#267 Post by Highway 61 »

Another example of how the Kubrick estate has no intentions of maintaining the director's wishes, which, frankly, is nice for the fans. At this rate I'm dead certain that it's only a matter of time before the Strangelove pie fight and Shining hospital scenes surface. And eventually, Fear and Desire, and what I'd like to see more than anything else, the 17 minutes of 2001 excised immediately following the premier.

As for Aryan Papers, it needs a director bold enough to escape from Kubrick's shadow, but of course, the family and studio will insist on a safe choice. Ultimately the only good that will come of it is that the screenplay will almost certainly be published.

Despite all this, the one thing that the Kubrick estate needs to do more than anything else is ensure that Barry Lyndon finally gets the release it deserves. Warner leaving it out of their most recent Kubrick releases was a fucking joke, and their overall botching of that set (for the third time no less) was one of the first signs that the wheels were coming off their home video department. If it's true that Criterion now has something brewing with WB, this is one of the titles they need to go after.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#268 Post by tavernier »

Highway 61 wrote:As for Aryan Papers, it needs a director bold enough to escape from Kubrick's shadow, but of course, the family and studio will insist on a safe choice.
That's a job for Spielberg: Schindler's List 2.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#269 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

tavernier wrote: That's a job for Spielberg: Schindler's List 2: Let's Get This Party Started.
Fixed.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#270 Post by tavernier »

No, that's actually the Tarantino version.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Stanley Kubrick

#271 Post by domino harvey »

In Tarantino's version, Schindler actually goes down the list and crosses the names out
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: 496 Che

#272 Post by aox »

Didn't Kubrick even continue editing his films for the first few months after they were theatrically released? I am thinking of The Shining specifically.
Last edited by aox on Mon Oct 19, 2009 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TedW
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: A Theatre Near You

Re: 496 Che

#273 Post by TedW »

2001 was edited as well, after the premiere.
Nothing
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:04 am

Re: 496 Che

#274 Post by Nothing »

aox wrote:Didn't Kubrick even continue editing his films for the first few months after they were theatrically released? I am thinking of The Shining specifically.
Yet he allowed both substantial versions to remain in circulation. And who here wouldn't jump through hoops to see the original cut of 2001...?

Also, again, I must point out there is a difference between tightening / trimming an edit and completely restructuring a film with the use of new material (material that was itself originally intended as a draft).
Last edited by Nothing on Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aox
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:02 pm
Location: nYc

Re: 496 Che

#275 Post by aox »

sorry to get off topic but,
Nothing wrote:
aox wrote:Didn't Kubrick even continue editing his films for the first few months after they were theatrically released? I am thinking of The Shining specifically.
Yet he allowed both versions to remain in circulation. And who here wouldn't jump through hoops to see the original cut of 2001...?
how do I see these cuts? I would love to see the 20-30 minutes excised from the Shining including the alternate ending.
Post Reply