Artificial Eye / Curzon Film World
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
- Contact:
Yes, that's true. The best Indian DVDs I've seen to date were the AE Apu Trilogy, and MoC's Abhijaan...nowhere near pristine. Still, I was at least hoping that the many delays would result in transfers similar to those. But I've been too eager to see Charulata in a decent form; a friend of mine who is largely responsible for my interest in movies claims its Ray's best film, and is endlessly frustrated about the lack of quality release.
- Matango
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:19 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Perkins Cobb
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm
I'd have to see it in motion, but from Gary's caps it does look like an "as good as it gets" situation. Indifference can't be the only reason there's no Indian cinema in the Criterion catalog.
MOC's Abhijan is a great-looking DVD, though. It's given me a ruinous hope for more quality Satyajit Ray DVDs one day....
Have to disagree with this, though - the transfer might look fine, but it's one of the worst PAL->NTSC conversions I've ever seen. The unnatural "sped up" quality to the motion in the image was so bad I gave up after a few minutes -- and then cursed myself for skipping a recent theatrical screening because I figured this DVD would be OK. Does anyone know why BFI, a UK label, released only NTSC discs of this and A River Called Titas? As far as I know those are their only two releases in that format.Matango wrote:BFI's DVD of Ghatak's The Cloud-Capped Star, though, is pretty good, and has moments of clarity that are among the most vivid I've seen on any SD DVD transfer. Ray fans would find that a worthwhile title to add to their collection, btw.
MOC's Abhijan is a great-looking DVD, though. It's given me a ruinous hope for more quality Satyajit Ray DVDs one day....
- sidehacker
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
- Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
- Contact:
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
To say I disagree with his opinion of the film is something of an understatement (I wasn't the one who voted the film 10 in the sidebar, but I'm glad someone tried to redress the balance!), but here's DVD Times' Noel Megahey on AE's You, The Living.
-
Zobalob
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:34 am
- Location: Scotland
I guess he just didn't get it, I saw the movie and thought it was hugely entertaining, I preferred it to "Songs From the Second Floor", and that's a great movie too. I love the "fish tank" lighting he employs and the deadpan (Beckett comes to mind) humour. I didn't vote in the sidebar either, though I may just go back to do so.MichaelB wrote:To say I disagree with his opinion of the film is something of an understatement (I wasn't the one who voted the film 10 in the sidebar, but I'm glad someone tried to redress the balance!), but here's DVD Times' Noel Megahey on AE's You, The Living.
Edit....since I haven't seen the DVD, I didn't vote.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
- foggy eyes
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:58 pm
- Location: UK
He's maybe a little harsh, but I think Noel is onto something here - I had a little moan about the film in another thread a few days ago (can't remember which). All the reviews I've read have been some shade of glowing, so I'm pleased that somebody has tried to take Andersson's fussy aesthetic down a notch. Probably the most disappointing theatrical release of the year for me so far - anybody who hasn't seen much of Andersson's work should definitely pick up A Swedish Love Story on DVD first.MichaelB wrote:To say I disagree with his opinion of the film is something of an understatement (I wasn't the one who voted the film 10 in the sidebar, but I'm glad someone tried to redress the balance!), but here's DVD Times' Noel Megahey on AE's You, The Living.
- Michael Kerpan
- Spelling Bee Champeen
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:20 pm
- Location: New England
- Contact:
- sidehacker
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
- Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
- Contact:
I've heard (from a source I can't remember) that Andersson's cinematic progression was greatly influenced by the pressure he was receiving to make another A Swedish Love Story film. As a result, he decided to make the complete opposite and the result was Gilliap. Like him or not, one has to admit that he is one of cinema's most elusive and interesting figures.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- foggy eyes
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:58 pm
- Location: UK
I missed Songs for some reason, so You, the Living came as quite a shock! A Swedish Love Story is full of extremely sensitive filmmaking, and the way in which Andersson prevents the whole exercise from tipping over into sheer mawkishness is very impressive. The observational style in You, the Living however struck me as weirdly meticulous, cynical and lifeless, so sidehacker's post makes a lot of sense.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
DVD Outsider on You The Living - much more on the film's wavelength.
- pro-bassoonist
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:26 am
-
Adam
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:29 am
- Location: Los Angeles CA
- Contact:
-
Perkins Cobb
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm
Man, this sounds like a disaster. If they really are NTSC->PAL conversions, I wonder if they're actually ports of the American Bollywood Home Entertainment DVDs. I hope Gary will do a comparison.zone_resident wrote:DVD Times on Satyajit Ray Collection – Volume 1
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
- Contact:
-
zone_resident
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:33 pm
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
-
Adam
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:29 am
- Location: Los Angeles CA
- Contact:
-
peerpee
- not perpee
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:41 pm
I'd take a guess that the masters are NTSC. AE should probably have considered issuing an NTSC master as an NTSC disc (like MoC did with ABHIJAN). Instead of doing an NTSC > PAL conversion -- which introduces the combing.HerrSchreck wrote:Combing (result of nonprogressive) is the result of the transfer itself-- it has nothing to do with the original print's disposition.