Criterion Random Speculation Vol.4
- ellipsis7
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
- Location: Dublin
re. BLOW-UP...
To give it it's due, Warner have released it in R1US & R2UK, the latter being the better transfer (see Beaver comparison) both including very decent Peter Brunette commentary & isolated music track plus 3 language dubbs...
Just looking at Maryon Park, Charlton, London (where the crucial scenes were shot) on Google Maps satellite image - fascinating...
To give it it's due, Warner have released it in R1US & R2UK, the latter being the better transfer (see Beaver comparison) both including very decent Peter Brunette commentary & isolated music track plus 3 language dubbs...
Just looking at Maryon Park, Charlton, London (where the crucial scenes were shot) on Google Maps satellite image - fascinating...
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
Who is this avatar? Is this a very young Fassbinder? I used to actually (dont laugh) think that was the man behind poster Jean Luc Garbo.DrunkenGaijin wrote:Seeing Wenders in the collection would be incredible. There is a surprising lack of his films readily available, or maybe I'm blind...
Color me oblivious.
-
Wittsdream
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:00 am
- Location: Chicago
Absolutely concur with this assessment of El Sur. Erice's mise-en-scene is breathtaking. Had the chance to watch it again tonight (w/English subs), and came away from this viewing with the sense that I've seen one of the most organic displays of storytelling ever committed to film.Gigi M. wrote:El Sur is a better a film than Beehive. An absolute masterpiece of a film.
Not sure if there's ever been a filmmaker that so eloquently renders the experience of childhood, and the forebodement of the adult world quite like Erice (Tarkovsky is certainly a contender and Loach is perhaps more politically committed).
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
Skuhn8 is Lilian Gish, and I will not entertain any other theories or ideas.zedz wrote:Yep.HerrSchreck wrote:Who is this avatar? Is this a very young Fassbinder?!! Not laughing, but I'm afraid I've got to break some bad news to you regarding skuhn8. . .I used to actually (dont laugh) think that was the man behind poster Jean Luc Garbo.
His previous avatar of the DVDVerdict dude was the best avatar on the forum.. period. Ever.
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
- Contact:
I hope Criterion manages to secure this film as a special feature for Wings of Desire. Sort of seems like a no brainer.
I also hope Criterion can secure more than these two Wenders films. I'm not a huge fan of his work, but for Pete's sake, what do I have to do to see Kings of the Road? I was about sold on the upcoming R2, when this happened, and now I'm convinced there may be a Criterion release somewhere down the road.
I also hope Criterion can secure more than these two Wenders films. I'm not a huge fan of his work, but for Pete's sake, what do I have to do to see Kings of the Road? I was about sold on the upcoming R2, when this happened, and now I'm convinced there may be a Criterion release somewhere down the road.
- sidehacker
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
- Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
- Contact:
- Cronenfly
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:04 pm
Color me dead wrong.davebert wrote:Not sure where to post this, but I have it from an inside source that Paris, Texas and Wings of Desire are stone cold confirmed for Criterions, which would explain why the Wings of Desire disc went OOP a short while ago. Dunno if anyone already posted this, but there's your Wenders.
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
I'm surprised to see Criterion tackling those since they were already available with commentary tracks, deleted scenes, etc. Does Wenders hold the copyright to his films like his buddy Jarmusch does? It certainly seems that way since his production company is generally the only credited copyright holder. I wonder if he produces and owns his own supplements as well. If that's the case, the commentary tracks and other features from the studio-produced versions of Wings and Paris could be ported to the Criterions. The Big C is going to really have to knock my socks off with these packages if they want to convince me that it's worth paying three times what I did for the original releases to upgrade them.davebert wrote:Not sure where to post this, but I have it from an inside source that Paris, Texas and Wings of Desire are stone cold confirmed for Criterions, which would explain why the Wings of Desire disc went OOP a short while ago. Dunno if anyone already posted this, but there's your Wenders.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
What about a big boxset including both Wings of Desire and Faraway, So Close? That would satisfy the requests for both more Wenders and extra Peter Falk!
Not to mention finally introoducing Mikhail Gorbachev into the Criterion Collection (maybe they could get him to do an introduction to the film?)
EDIT: Forget it, looks like Faraway is held by Sony
Not to mention finally introoducing Mikhail Gorbachev into the Criterion Collection (maybe they could get him to do an introduction to the film?)
EDIT: Forget it, looks like Faraway is held by Sony
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
I still dont understand the relationship between MGM and Sony. Aren't they now the same company?colinr0380 wrote:What about a big boxset including both Wings of Desire and Faraway, So Close? That would satisfy the requests for both more Wenders and extra Peter Falk!
Not to mention finally introoducing Mikhail Gorbachev into the Criterion Collection (maybe they could get him to do an introduction to the film?)
EDIT: Forget it, looks like Faraway is held by Sony
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
- Contact:
This is how I came to understand it. I could be quite wrong.
- Sony bought MGM, but MGM still has some authority over its affairs.
- MGM was not happy with Sony's distribution and technical treatment of their back catalogue.
- So MGM tried letting Fox have a try at it, and Fox seem to be more up to it.
- Sony bought MGM, but MGM still has some authority over its affairs.
- MGM was not happy with Sony's distribution and technical treatment of their back catalogue.
- So MGM tried letting Fox have a try at it, and Fox seem to be more up to it.
- miless
- Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am
- HerrSchreck
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm
The whole thing is nerve wracking, as there's some great UA stuff in there, not to mention the genuine mgm titles, and of course well-beloved Midnite Movies too. I'm always afraid the next piece of catalog whoredom is going to come down with "Due to low sales and margins, the Midnite Movies line will be discontinued. We thank our loyal consumers for their support over the years, and we hope to have better news for you in the future. Our apologies-- and ponds of tears-- but..."
Thankfully Fox have stepped up. They've actually been getting down righteously... Witchfinder General, Man of the West, not to mention the Fox line on its own, Big Trail, Ford @ Fox, coming Borzaage... they've been diddling up quite a nice mambo lately. They keep it up they're going to zap by WB, which is seriously pissing me off w the silents-- lies lies lies.
MGM is in good hands now, it seems. At least for the time being.
Thankfully Fox have stepped up. They've actually been getting down righteously... Witchfinder General, Man of the West, not to mention the Fox line on its own, Big Trail, Ford @ Fox, coming Borzaage... they've been diddling up quite a nice mambo lately. They keep it up they're going to zap by WB, which is seriously pissing me off w the silents-- lies lies lies.
MGM is in good hands now, it seems. At least for the time being.
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
From Jameson281, our own inside man at MGM:justeleblanc wrote:I still dont understand the relationship between MGM and Sony. Aren't they now the same company?
MGM is owned by a consortium made up of Sony, Comcast and various companies that put up financing to buy it. When MGM was unhappy with Sony's distribution of its product, it dumped them as distributor and talked to various companies to take over that work. Fox made the best offer. So they are distributor only; they "own" no part of MGM.
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
- CSM126
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
- Location: The Room
- Contact:
Why would Criterion (or anyone else) do something as dumb as snatch up the rights to two movies that used to be available in special editions just to downgrade them to barebones editions?justeleblanc wrote:Does that make both of these Wenders titles Fox titles, and thus possibilities for an Eclipse set?
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that Fox can't license MGM product, since they are a third-party distributor themselves. I'm betting that MGM and Fox's distribution rights to the two Wenders titles have just expired and reverted back to his own production company. Maybe Jameson can step in and set us straight.justeleblanc wrote:Does that make both of these Wenders titles Fox titles, and thus possibilities for an Eclipse set?
- fdm
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:25 pm
A couple of other Wenders titles that were supposed to be put out by Anchor Bay eons ago, that didn't subsequently make it into their box either (far as I know), were The Goalie's Fear Of The Penalty [1971] and State Of Things [1982]. Perhaps these could make it into a Criterion/Eclipse box of some sort.
(They were also going to put out Subeila's Man Facing Southeast in early 2003, supposedly).
(They were also going to put out Subeila's Man Facing Southeast in early 2003, supposedly).
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
- Contact:
Amen.CSM126 wrote:Why would Criterion (or anyone else) do something as dumb as snatch up the rights to two movies that used to be available in special editions just to downgrade them to barebones editions?justeleblanc wrote:Does that make both of these Wenders titles Fox titles, and thus possibilities for an Eclipse set?
Eclipse is going to our brains, man.