Ford at Fox: 24 Film Boxset

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
What A Disgrace
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:34 am
Contact:

#176 Post by What A Disgrace »

Props55 wrote:Yeah, the decision to not include the complete Anderson/Omnibus Ford doc on the YOUNG MR. LINCOLN disc has now become an extras programming nightmare right up there with the chopped up and parcelled out "Renoir the Patron" and "Cineastes des Notre Temps" programs. I had a bad feeling when I realized that the complete film was not on disc two and wondered what CC could possibly have in mind to pair it up with since the Ford "Essentials" had already been released via Fox direct. I had fleetingly high hopes for some possible silents despite CC's apparent disinterest in anything without a dialogue track but FORD AT FOX certainly makes that unlikely in the immediate future.
Well, judging from what happened with the Renoir doc being split between Rules/Stage and Spectacle...perhaps Criterion had; or perhaps still has, their eye on a late period Ford film?

It's probably too much to expect something like The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance; that's one of Ford's more popular titles. Perhaps Criterion has/had been working on a deal with Artisan for the rights to some or all of his Argosy/Republic films, and were planning to include the second half of the doc in that release?

I can't imagine Criterion would only do half of that doc if they were absolutely sure that Young Mr. Lincoln was going to be their only Ford release. Bugs the heck out of me.
User avatar
ellipsis7
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 5:56 pm
Location: Dublin

#177 Post by ellipsis7 »

The difference between the Ford & Renoir docs, is that the Ford Omnibus part #1 is edited down about 10 minutes from the broadcast version, presumably to excise clips that rights could not be cleared for US release, whereas the Renoir Omnibus parts #1 & #2 are complete and as originally transmitted... The imperative to get out a shortened Ford Omnibus part #2 is thus rather less...
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#178 Post by Tommaso »

tryavna wrote:World Moves On is not an essential film by any stretch of the imagination, but I found it to be a somewhat more interesting experience than others. In particular, since you've seen Bernard's Wooden Crosses, it would be kind of neat to see how Ford -- or, more probably in this case, the Fox editing staff -- incorporated footage from that film into World.
Ah well, I had totally forgotten about the Bernard connection. Probably because I felt embarassed about the use of Bernard's images in another film, I didn't even properly realise that it was in a Ford film on top of it. So thanks for the reminder.

Briefly coming back to Ford's style and mise-en-scene et al., two more impressions: First, "Drums along the Mohawk". I watched this for the first time now, and while I wonder why they chose to put this into the Essential Box (I think it's really a minor film, and the technicolor doesn't help it at all), it's a perfect example of Schreck's point about non-lingering. There are so many extremely beautiful shots of the landscape that just last for one or two seconds or, if longer, have so much activity in them that indeed you don't have the time to take them in. I found this in this film even more pronounced than in many other Fords. However, despite of the brevity, one still gets the feeling that the landscape is THERE, one knows exactly how it looks. It must all work on a subliminal basis, I suppose.

Secondly, on the Murnau influence again, referring to "Hangman's House". I probably shouldn't comment on this before seeing "Four Sons", but as Gallagher sees this as the stronger and more individual picture, I'd say: this is really strange for me. Parts of it look as if they actually used the sets of "Sunrise" again (the boat trip, for instance), and perhaps they really did. While this is a very beautiful-looking film generally, it somehow doesn't feel right. Ford seems to have used the style of Murnau - plus a big deal of Gothic-looking other German films as well - in a manner which for me is never more than picturesque. I just couldn't see WHY this had to look the way it does, so much so that it almost looks like a parody in places. Think of the black-dressed mourning women: of course the clothes they're wearing are the clothes that Irish women would have worn for such an occasion, but the way how Ford places them in that castle makes them look like they're some nuns going to a black mass; like something straight out of Huysmans or so. In another shot we have VERY large cobwebs dangling from the ceiling: now how the hell did these get there in the otherwise neat house? I mean, this is not a Transsylvanian castle uninhabited apart from Max Schreck for the last 500 years.... – I couldn't help laughing out loud about these and other such shots, and because it felt so overdone I was reminded of the over-the-top character of "Cat and the Canary", but that film was intentionally parodistic, while Ford's surely wasn't. All this didn't distract too much from my general enjoyment of the film, but I'm still worried about how such an adapatation of stylistic features didn't make the film more interesting, but rather made it dangerously border on a filmic equivalent of a dime novel romance. In a way, it looks like what an American audience would think a typically German film would look like, without knowing too much about what makes sense in such a film and what is not.
User avatar
John Hodson
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Near dark satanic mills...
Contact:

#179 Post by John Hodson »

Tommaso wrote:Briefly coming back to Ford's style and mise-en-scene et al., two more impressions: First, "Drums along the Mohawk". I watched this for the first time now, and while I wonder why they chose to put this into the Essential Box (I think it's really a minor film, and the technicolor doesn't help it at all), it's a perfect example of Schreck's point about non-lingering. There are so many extremely beautiful shots of the landscape that just last for one or two seconds or, if longer, have so much activity in them that indeed you don't have the time to take them in. I found this in this film even more pronounced than in many other Fords. However, despite of the brevity, one still gets the feeling that the landscape is THERE, one knows exactly how it looks. It must all work on a subliminal basis, I suppose.
For all its faults, I love 'Drums' and I think that there's an even greater film struggling to get out; Zanuck upbraided Ford for 'lingering' during filming and I've long mused that the picture was - 'damaged' might be too strong a word, but then again possibly not - very heavily influenced by the producer, much to Ford's chagrin.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#180 Post by Tommaso »

I sure agree that Zanuck might have had a bad hand in it, but according to Gallagher Ford set out filming without a completed script, and somehow it shows. My reservations are not so much against the films depictions of Native Americans and the somewhat overdone hoisting of the flag at the end (but also against these), but I have much more problems with its rambling character, the absence of any really gripping story-line. It has some great acting, but simply lacks focus for me. The technicolour also gives the film a picturesque quality without adding to the overall effect.
User avatar
John Hodson
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Near dark satanic mills...
Contact:

#181 Post by John Hodson »

I don't intend to get mired into any argument over the depiction of Native Americans, but the fuss over the flag-raising is essential for at least a couple of reasons that I can think of - firstly, as far as Ford is concerned this is his film of a pivotal moment in American history, the first thrusts west, the creation of the republic, the making of 'home'. Give it the works.

Secondly, Ford and Zanuck both knew war was coming; time to stiffen the backbone to puff the chest out...and to ease off on the British (for example, there's a line of Arthur Shields that was overdubbed during post-production and there's no doubt in my mind that there were probably hasty re-writes on that unfinished script as the situation in Europe developed). Time for more than a little patriotism.
Last edited by John Hodson on Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#182 Post by HerrSchreck »

I'm with tryavna on this-- I think Drums is hugely underrated. I saw it for the first time this weekend, along with-- for the first time in a long time (vague meories from childhood, I know my parents, probably like every other American's parents, liked Ford a lot)-- HGWMValley (phew, incredible).

I don't see the big problems others apparently see in this. I like the way the story is a bit flimsy, with an ever-so-light sense of a thrust running thru the thru line. It jumps in parts, leaves big gaps in the narrative, and in that sense (aloong with the magnificent Bert Glennon's photog) feels bordering on an "ambitious" picture, almost Powell/Pressburgerian. It's goal I felt was to simply "put you there" in that time, in that millieu, and get you to feel the sun, the cold, the exhaustion, the challenge of frontier life, and on those terms it succeeded spectacularly. I never saw studio locations, I saw the real frontier in the eighteenth century. I didn't even need to see the Americans as heroes (I kept thinking of films from Israel)... it simply puts you there. The film, like Ford & Colbert's spunky tough old widow'd housekeepr (the closest thing to a spokesperson for Ford & Zanuck in this film if I read it properly) has no politics, really.

One of the funniest pieces of "smuggled by the censors" buried-in-the-cinematic-bushes editorial comment on a charactyer in the text I ever saw by Ford in any film, is a scene, very brief, where we see a shot of Carradine's villain standing beside his horse, shot from behind. The horse flicks his tail, showing his NUDE UNEDITED ASH GREY-FLESHED HORSE ASSHOLE for a second, and tags Carradine with his tail. It's the quickest, hardly neccessary piece of business, it lasts less than 30 seconds, and if it wasn't put in there (with Ford gagging on his pipe smoke & probably dropping his pipe on the floor laughing his teeth out in the editing room when he realized the asshole itself is clearly visible for a moment and would be amplified to one foot by one foot on those big old screens) to simply say this (horse's asshole)-------> is this (Carradine's villain) I'd take a bath in a tub filled with rancid hog guts.

HGWMValley is obviously a masterpiece for the ages, and left me a blathering heap of an idiot. Pure magic from start to end. I could see how some englishmen could snigger at the "off" accents-- but there's a film there too, besides the accents (I've seen some british actors give off some howlers of US accent approximations, yet loved the films). If the film didn't move you despite the accents, you may want to get in for a checkup and make sure a pulse is there.

This isn't, after all, Ellizabeth Bergner in Paul Czinners As You Like It, where wifey Liz completely destroys the part simply by annoying the crap out of you, partly with her ridiculous AUstrian accent. Like Coppola in God3, Czinner learned the hard way that giving crucial parts in expensive pictures to loved ones is a Bad Thing, especially if you are unwilling to yell and scream at them... especially (in Bergner's case) if they are getting so self-indulgent (because of their connection to the director) that they are directly ruining not only their own performance, but the performance of others because of the bratty flailing & chewing, and by extension, the whole film in sum. As you like it is one of the most gloriously photographed, gloriously decor'd, gloriously costumed, SUPERbad movies. Olivier (very young and looking VERY non-hetero... was he gay or bi?) isn't awful impressive here either. Bergner (that her name? she was also the inspiration for Eve in All ABout Eve) was so bad that she just has the power to flatten All Surrounding Achievement. Her Ganymede was actually more feminine than her Rosalind... you have to see it, you wont believe how fully she ruins this should-be nice pic.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#183 Post by Tommaso »

John, I see that the patriotism was needed at the time, but hoisting the flag on top of the old church (of all places) is a little bit too much rubbing it in, at least for my taste. But as I said, these are not the major problems for me, it's rather the storyline (or absence of it). Also individual moments like the curious scene in which the old lady is carried out by dutiful Indians while remaining in her bed. It's totally funny, of course, but that bit of comedy somehow doesn't fit with the rest of the film.
HerrSchreck wrote: It jumps in parts, leaves big gaps in the narrative, and in that sense (aloong with the magnificent Bert Glennon's photog) feels bordering on an "ambitious" picture, almost Powell/Pressburgerian.
I'd never thought of THAT comparison. Which film(s) do you have mind? Unless you thought of "Ill met by moonlight" (which is close to a desaster, and in any case far worse than "Mohawk", even in narrative) I can only imagine that you might have thought of "49th parallel" or "One of our aircraft", because especially the former has these narrative jumps and the emphasis on the landscape imagery as well. Like "Mohawk", it seems to be just about some people (though its the apparently bad guys here) trying to get ahm...somewhere. P&P manage to provide an ending, however, that is far more gripping than the almost casual final fight in "Mohawk", and have a nice way of leading us up to that ending. But the major difference is that the narrative in "49th" is almost an excuse for a study of the motivations of the characters and especially their change during the course of the journey. Instead, in "Mohawk" characters are defined more or less at the beginning and remain what the are, even though Lana admittedly has to adapt to the new life and takes a while to do so. But there's no real turnaround moment anywhere, and I find both the Fonda and the Colbert characters much flatter, far less interesting than anyone in major P&P.
HerrSchreck wrote: It's goal I felt was to simply "put you there" in that time, in that millieu, and get you to feel the sun, the cold, the exhaustion, the challenge of frontier life, and on those terms it succeeded spectacularly. I never saw studio locations, I saw the real frontier in the eighteenth century.
Yes, that is absolutely true.

I'm looking forward to finally see "How green is my valley". Though the "Becoming John Ford" docu is indeed far from great, it at least gave me some first glimpses at this. And with these few excerpts , this time I was indeed was reminded of Powell, "The Edge of the World", that is. But I'll see for myself, soon.
User avatar
tryavna
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

#184 Post by tryavna »

Tommaso wrote:My reservations are not so much against the films depictions of Native Americans and the somewhat overdone hoisting of the flag at the end (but also against these), but I have much more problems with its rambling character, the absence of any really gripping story-line. It has some great acting, but simply lacks focus for me.
These comments really puzzle me, T. Because what you're talking about is what I think is really special about Ford's films -- his best ones always ramble a bit in terms of plot. In fact, it's all those digressions into character and atmosphere that separate Ford from most other American-born Hollywood directors. (And I can see where Schreck is going in terms of the P&P comparison, which I would extend to most other British cinema. While Ford himself might not like being compared to English directors, he does share their love of sacrificing narrative drive for developing quirks of character -- a practice that certainly dates back to Victorian literature.)

For me, the flag-raising scene is essential to Drums, because the founding of the nation is the end of the story -- the goal for which everyone's actions have been leading toward. Plus, it offers a really fine glimpse of Ford's multicultural outlook. How many other directors in 1939 are going to place a Native American, a black woman, and German/Dutch immigrants at the center of the American community at the very moment it emerges? It's really quite wonderful once you get past some of the patronization that makes us slightly uncomfortable today.

Finally, it's worth noting that the film's episodic structure and slightly anti-climactic ending was dictated to certain degree with Ford's (and Zanuck's) decision to stick rather more closely to history that was usual at the time. So the battles are depicted on an appropriately small scale, and the climax itself is Fonda's run for help rather than its aftermath.

Frankly, I have no problems with Drums at all. But if you're getting ready to sit down to HGWMV for the first time, then you are indeed ready for a treat. That's an unqualified masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#185 Post by Tommaso »

tryavna wrote:These comments really puzzle me, T. Because what you're talking about is what I think is really special about Ford's films -- his best ones always ramble a bit in terms of plot. In fact, it's all those digressions into character and atmosphere that separate Ford from most other American-born Hollywood directors.
Yes, but I see a difference in the rambling here as compared to the rambling in say, "Stagecoach". In the latter film there's a clear goal: reaching that town in general and the final shootout for Wayne in particular (just as in "49th Parallel" the aim is to cross the border). We get a lot of characterization and atmosphere along the way, and these are probably the main aims of the film, but it's all embedded in a convincing general story line. I just didn't see this in "Mohawk" (but see my comment below), and as I said, there's not too much we learn about the characters along the way that we didn't know right at the beginning. In a similar way, the rambling in "The Iron Horse" is held together by everything working towards the final meeting of the railroad lines.
tryavna wrote:For me, the flag-raising scene is essential to Drums, because the founding of the nation is the end of the story -- the goal for which everyone's actions have been leading toward.
Good point. Perhaps this wasn't obvious enough for me as a non-American, and you almost convinced me that my non-awareness of this might be at least partly responsible for my problems with the film. While watching this I always had to rely on and think about the little that I remembered about American history at the time, trying to sort out what could be the role of the 'Tories' and Carradine's character, for instance. All these things would be immediately apparent for an American, and so would have been that final goal that I missed when watching the film.
tryavna wrote:Plus, it offers a really fine glimpse of Ford's multicultural outlook. How many other directors in 1939 are going to place a Native American, a black woman, and German/Dutch immigrants at the center of the American community at the very moment it emerges? It's really quite wonderful once you get past some of the patronization that makes us slightly uncomfortable today.
Yes, that's certainly true. I'm not sure how much the patronization made me uncomfortable (to quite a degree though, I'd say), but I'm fully aware that this is an old film and shouldn't be judged by our standards now. But I didn't want to put too much emphasis on that final scene from the beginning in my initial post. This was just an example of something I found somewhat problematic, but surely it wasn't the reason why I had my problems with the film.

And after what you have written, I do look even more forward to HGWMV. I guess that regardless of the qualities of the film itself I will have far less difficulties working out the historical contexts in this case.
djali999
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:41 pm
Location: Florie-dah

#186 Post by djali999 »

For whatever strengths and weaknesses Drums Along the Mohawk has, and it does have both, the end of the film really is a dilly for me, one of the best Ford moments I can think of. The Militia comes marching in with the brand new American flag and all the farmers and assorted riffraff, the people who have been "doing the fighting and the dying" for this abstract concept of their country, all stand around looking at it unsure of what to make of it. "Yeah, that's our flag... I guess that's it..."

That's about as unexpected and intelligent an end as possible at the end of a film about the Revolutionary War... you expect the Federal soldiers to show up with the flag and everybody just goes nuts, but here they are looking at the physical embodiment of what they've been suffering or and it just doesn't seem to match up to what they've just lived through. Great moment at the end of a pretty good movie. The new transfer on the DVD helps it considerably: the old DVD was a misregistered mess.[/b]
User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:46 pm

#187 Post by HerrSchreck »

tryavna wrote:(And I can see where Schreck is going in terms of the P&P comparison, which I would extend to most other British cinema. While Ford himself might not like being compared to English directors, he does share their love of sacrificing narrative drive for developing quirks of character -- a practice that certainly dates back to Victorian literature.)
Very close to what I mean. P&P had a natural ability to make the ordinary seem huge.. take moments of a "life" transposed on screen, and cause you the viewer to swell up with sentiment hugely by the size of the impact.

Of course P&P had a far more stylish sense of the grand, and of hi art in general which they very self consciously injected into their pictures. But to me Colonel Blimp himself feels very Fordian owing to the size of his character, his connection to national tradition and sentiment, and via the sheer size of his delivery to the audience via P&P. Take a film like CANTERBURY TALE... sure on the surface there is a sophistication there vis the Chaucer etc. But if you examine that film and its substance very carefully, pick it apart and examine what it's made of and what it's doing, I'd say there's enough similarity there to chew on for quite an unexplored while. Look at the nighttime sets and the handling of the studio-bound Glue Man attack sequence, for example... that scene looks very Fordian to me.

Aside from the BIG characters.. the stationmaster so proud of his job, the village idiot, the warm kind hokey american soldier, the extreme variegation and charm of all the rest of the assorted characters in TALE, what is it that P&P are up to in this film aside from drawing this narrative line about national identity thru which are threaded the threads of a few characters thrown together by History and Fate (all very Fordian to me)?

What I think PP are doing-- and this is something I woke up to when getting my first look at I Know Where Im Going-- is Trafficking In Hieghtened Moments of Being Alive for their characters. They know what constitutes "a memory" for a human being: for example, in IKWIG, the scene where Livesey is talking across the windows at night to Hiller's character, with the evening light and the sea and the wind and the thin curtains blowing. If you or I or anyone else took the journey those characters did, despite the unfolding of larger or more "significant" events, THAT moment in the evening, talking across the windows would be something magical that would make you feel good while doing it, it would be one of those excellent moments where the earth and the sky and the constructs we build around us all come together and become sublime. As an old man you'd reminisce about "talking across the windows to this pretty young lady" whether you wound up marrying her or not. And if you did youd probably remember it more fondly than your wedding day.

Watching this scene makes you FEEL GOOD. You become alive to the characters and their surroundings the same way the characters are supposed to be. P&P had a way of finding those moments, nice conversations where people are REAALY enjoying one another's company.. they draw their characters with unabashed charm and delight, they are unabashedly deep in displaying their love for their country and the picturesqueness of its physical environs. And like Ford-- and this is something I've woken up to recently in my own "search" for Ford-- they unabashedly use music swelling with extreme sentiment.

Although the films are very different (and I might find another picture with greater similarity, especially viz the Technicolor which played into my initial sense of P&P when watching Drums.. but I'll stick with TALE since I just brought it up) Canterbury Tale & Drums have enough similarity to try and bring hom my point. Tale's ending is similarly (sort of) anticlimactic, and leaves the viewer wondering wtf? Suddenly the glue man is the good guy and all is forgiven because Nobody Loves Sublime Historical England? If you wanta extrapolate out into Implication, it's almost a justification of every whore killing society-cleansing Serial Killer on the face of the earth with his own Social Program For Flushing Modern Human Crud, And Flirtatious Women. Then we go to CHURCH(???!!!).

Of course the film is much more than that... and so much more is drums about than the flag going up (and djali nailed it above btw), and the barbarous indians vs the good Americans. While I think TALE is the better (more nuanced, more modern and less predictable) and richer film of the two, they both traffic in moments of "swollen humanity", magical moments, moments of atmosphere savoring the beauty of country and homeland, examining the charm of our own mythological national characters, and the directors are always aiming for your heart.. trying to seduce you with coziness, chill you with cold and wet, charm you with good grizzled characters who are on your side and will always do the right thing in a pinch. They're "about" country, but they are "composed of" interludes of human relations enveloped in earthy atmospheres, not action. The battles in Drums are really just an asterisk. Despite the flair for modernism in P&P (which Ford could approach when he wanted, i e Searchers), I believe that in terms of theme, sentiment and character rendering, they are the filmmakers who most resemble John Ford. They unquestionable were to England what Ford was to the USA.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#188 Post by Tommaso »

Schreck, as always a great piece of writing, and there's just little I want to add, especially because "A Canterbury Tale" is one of my very,very favourite films for much the same reasons you describe.

I see very much where you come from when you compare the nighttime sets et al. to what Ford did, and of course all of the wonderful views of the villagers we get. The American soldier especially is such a warm-hearted and endearing portrait, the way how he as a foreigner gets along so well with these 'simple' people whereas his English colleague at first has difficulties with that. This is perhaps indicative that the films's take on identity is very multi-faceted: apart from a national identity you have an identity of 'origins', of mutual interest because of a similar background. Not that I don't see this in Ford, but in any case it's very pronounced in "Canterbury Tale", especially as the film for me has a certain ambiguity about the celebration of the past (which continues "Blimp" in a way). Colpeper is an angelic, magical figure BUT at the same time he IS that glue man (and as has been observed by, I think, Christie, it is not quite clear in the end whether he also receives a blessing like the other three characters or whether he indeed undergoes penitence). Think also of the lecture scene: he is a hypnotizer in a way, and he's presented almost like a dangerous Mabuse-like figure there visually. Obviously this comes straight out of German silent cinema, and I think it's not just one of Powell's usual nods in that direction, but actually has a well thought-out meaning there. The whole film for me is very much about the power of images and of cinema (all the discussions about cinema that occur in the dialogue from time to time), and very much a film that thematizes the magic, and the dangers of the magic of films (and by implication then, also the dangers of a too one-sided celebration of Englishness in film). Probably this ambiguity despite of the wonderful celebration of the countryside, history et al. is my main cause of fascination for it. And yes, like IKWIG, "Blimp", AMOLAD, it's indeed a film that makes you 'feel good' - although it's certainly 'high art' - in a way few other directors achieve.

With the comparison of Ford with P&P in mind, and leaving "Mohawk" aside for the moment, I sensed something like this in another Ford film I watched two days ago, and that is "Doctor Bull". Here I find is a real strong sense of community, of utter believability and earnestness of the characters, of a somewhat 'natural' sense of belonging, also of the 'old ways of doing' over the more modern, as exemplified by Bull's old ways are those that actually cure the paralyzed patient, not the modern achievements of medical science. All this indeed reminded me of the best of Powell's work. I expected a pretty minor film when I read the cover blurp, and actually only put it in because I felt too tired to watch something 'substantial', and was really surprised how good it was and indeed how good it made me feel. Truly wonderful, and somewhat mislabelled as a 'comedy'. It is funny and lighthearted of course, but has a great feeling of depth and earnestness in the way it makes its points. Like P&P.
HerrSchreck wrote:And like Ford-- and this is something I've woken up to recently in my own "search" for Ford-- they unabashedly use music swelling with extreme sentiment.
That's an interesting point, especially as I watched the version comparison on the "Clementine" disc recently. I only watched the preview version of the film (thankfully!), and was utterly shocked when I saw in the documentary not just the awful ending of the release version, but even more so about what Zanuck did to the scene of Clem's arrival in Tombstone. The pre-release version doesn't have any music at all, apart from someone playing the theme song (?) on a harmonica very much in the distance, almost inaudible. Zanuck opted for a big, indeed extremely sentimental (as opposed to full of sentiment) orchestral score. And it just marred that sublime scene for me. So I'm not sure in general how much influence Ford had regarding the music, here and elsewhere.I think the emotional music in P&P only works so well because it was actually mostly done by top-notch composers, Brian Easdale for instance, and – the high point for me – Vaughan Williams for "49th parallel". I really love that theme, and play it often without the film (I have a nice recording of it on some EMI Vaughan Williams cd). Nothing against Ford's music in general, but P&P's music is a class of its own.
User avatar
GringoTex
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:57 am

#189 Post by GringoTex »

Just watched Pilgrimage for the first time. It's the Rosetta Stone for Ford and mothers. And it was amazing watching Ford go from redneck Arknasas to Paris and back using nothing but ellipses. What could this man not do?
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

#190 Post by Gregory »

Having watched all the films in the box that I'd never seen before, I find the task of saying something about them too daunting. I think I'm suffering from a kind of Ford fatigue. On the whole, there were more disappointments than "undiscovered" treasures. Of the ones I watched for the first time, I was most impressed with Just Pals, Doctor Bull, Pilgrimage, Up the River, and Hangman's House. Most of the others left me thinking how unfortunate it is that Ford was compelled to make so many films each year. Then again it's likely that even with more time he wouldn't have been able to transform material like Four Men and a Prayer and The World Moves On into artistic statements, so perhaps the issue is how much discretion he had in choosing projects.

Again, there are many wonderful films in the set. For the most part, what I still desire to see more of are the silents. I only hope the set sold quickly enough that Fox will begin releasing at least a trickle of silent films on a consistent basis. They could do another silent Ford set with Cameo Kirby, Lightnin', Kentucky Pride, The Shamrock Handicap, The Blue Eagle, and Riley the Cop. Those all survived but may be in dire need of restoration for all I know.
User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 2:09 pm

#191 Post by Tommaso »

Gregory wrote:I think I'm suffering from a kind of Ford fatigue. On the whole, there were more disappointments than "undiscovered" treasures.

I felt somewhat similar after watching so many Ford films in the last few weeks, especially after those from the 'Comedies' set which I'm still not through with, missing the two 50s films. Anyway, while all of them were entertaining, none of them seemed to be truly exceptional to m, with the possible exception of "Doctor Bull".

So, in any case, before that fatigue got hold of me too much, I decided to finally watch "How green is my valley" yesterday, and I'm completely and totally floored. I can't understand how the fact that indeed Ford's Wales looks like a curious mixture of Hollywood's version of 'simple people lifestyle' and Ireland a la Ford could seriously hold anyone off from enjoying and admiring this film. The film may be celebrating nostalgia in a way, but never in the sense of saying 'these were the good ole days", because they clearly weren't. But there is such a wonderful roundness to the characters, so much sympathy and understanding in the acting, and Ford nevertheless manages to never play too overtly on the emotional bits. The love story is almost handled casually, and becomes much more effective by this. Any other director would have let Maureen O'Hara's husband die in the end and would have ended the film with a huge scene of the two lovers coming together. But Ford's ending, of course, is much more touching because it still upholds the precarious balance of sadness and possible change that is imminent in the end, and which isn't really resolved.

The visuals are simply knock-out. The care that went into the composition of each shot is surprising to me even with respect to most of the other Ford films in those sets. Completely unbelievable. Referring again to that P&P discussion, this must be Ford's counterpart to "A Canterbury Tale"...

In any case, I guess HGWMV for me is by far the best of Ford's films I've seen yet, and I'm not missing so many of them now...
User avatar
Thinkbach
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:10 am
Contact:

Steamboat Round The Bend

#192 Post by Thinkbach »

Just saw this too and loved it so much I couldn't speak, best thing to do is wait a while then watch it again...
GringoTex wrote:Steamboat Around the Bend

Watching this was like seeing a miracle. The way Ford juggles pathos, satire and slapstick within single shots is extraordinary. And his "floating museum," whereby mannequins of Yankee, European, and Biblical figures are redecorated into Southern heroes, and then cast in the hellfire of the steamboat furnace for love is one of the most brilliantly political things I've seen in cinema.
unclehulot
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: here and there

#193 Post by unclehulot »

neal wrote:I imagine that this will be all over the slimier deals forums soon, as there's no proof of purchase required-- so I'd fill this out now, if you bought the set.

Redemption for Frontier Marshal

My apologies if this has already been posted.
Anyone get theirs yet?
User avatar
htdm
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:46 am

#194 Post by htdm »

Not yet. It's been about eight weeks since I sent in my info.
User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

#195 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian »

Maybe they had to press a few extra batches. You know, to keep up with demand.
unclehulot
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: here and there

#196 Post by unclehulot »

The Fanciful Norwegian wrote:Maybe they had to press a few extra batches. You know, to keep up with demand.
They only need to press the same number that they pressed of the 24 film set right? I'm sure absolutely NOBODY submitted a form because they saw the answer to the question that served as proof of purchase, eh? :lol:
User avatar
thethirdman
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:26 pm

#197 Post by thethirdman »

I just received an email from Fox stating, "As a thank you for your continued loyalty, we will be shipping your complimentary copy of 'Frontier Marshall' very soon."
User avatar
Thinkbach
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:10 am
Contact:

#198 Post by Thinkbach »

I got it too, and I'm in Canada, so maybe they'll send it...
thethirdman wrote:I just received an email from Fox stating, "As a thank you for your continued loyalty, we will be shipping your complimentary copy of 'Frontier Marshall' very soon."
jaredsap
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
Location: Los Angeles

#199 Post by jaredsap »

thethirdman wrote:I just received an email from Fox stating, "As a thank you for your continued loyalty, we will be shipping your complimentary copy of 'Frontier Marshall' very soon."
Ditto.
User avatar
davebert
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

#200 Post by davebert »

Anyone actually receive their Frontier Marshall disc yet? I feel like I got that introductory email several weeks ago, and thought it was basically a shipping notice...
Post Reply