The Dark Knight Trilogy (Christopher Nolan, 2005-2012)
- Marcel Gioberti
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:55 am
- Location: Torino, Italy
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Marcel Gioberti
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:55 am
- Location: Torino, Italy
I assume he was jabbing Taymor. I personally think she made an otherwise unremarkable revenge tragedy a la Thomas Kyd something not just relevant but interesting. I just watched Titus last week for the first time in many years. It's not without flaws, but there's some genius at work, particularly the Aaron character. The ending is also sublime, makes me weep. Sorry about that.Cold Bishop wrote:Where have you been? (One of my favorite of his plays) Or is that a slight jab at Taymor's handling of the material?MichaelB wrote:That was Shakespeare?Marcel Gioberti wrote:Yeah, I remember learning about his infamous meltdowns while filming Julie Taymor's Titus.
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
I don't know if I'd call it unremarkable. I always thought it has a lot of potential greatness in it, but I guess I'll concede that my enjoyment of the play has always more to do with me imagining the various ways it could be stages and interpreted.
The film is uneven definitely... It has a lot of great moments and overall, its a great and inspired staging of the play, bloody and over the top as it well should be, but everytime that techno music starts up, or theres a music video style montage, I can't help but gag. And don't get me started on the whole Matrix 360° at the end.
The film is uneven definitely... It has a lot of great moments and overall, its a great and inspired staging of the play, bloody and over the top as it well should be, but everytime that techno music starts up, or theres a music video style montage, I can't help but gag. And don't get me started on the whole Matrix 360° at the end.
-
Roger_Thornhill
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:35 am
I hate to add more about Jack's response to Ledger's death as I know those sorts of things are frowned upon here, but...flyonthewall2983 wrote:From imdb.com
Jack Nicholson has hinted he warned tragic Heath Ledger against taking on the role of The Joker in the new Batman film. Ledger, 28 - who was declared dead at 3:30pm at his Manhattan apartment on Tuesday - publicly declared himself exhausted and sleep deprived in November following the grueling shoot for The Dark Knight. He also revealed in an interview with the New York Times he'd resorted to taking sleeping pills - an overdose of which is believed to be the cause of his death - in a desperate bid to catch up on rest. And Nicholson, who famously portrayed the menacing Joker in Tim Burton's 1989 movie Batman, implied to the waiting crowd outside plush London restaurant The Wolesley on Tuesday night he spoke to Ledger about his role in The Dark Knight - and warned him about the pitfalls of taking on such a demanding challenge. When asked by the London crowds for his reaction to Ledger's untimely demise, a defeated Nicholson simply replied, "I told him so." Batman Begins prequel The Dark Knight is due to be released in July.
I don't recall hearing him say "I told him so" in that clip of Jack responding to a question about Ledger's death. What I recall was that the paps stop Jack, inform him of Ledger's death, to which Jack says "My God, that's awful." Then he says, "I warned him." Although I've read that what Jack actually said was, "I warned them."
Other gossip: I read that Jack wasn't referring to "warning" Heath about playing The Joker, whom he claims to have never met, but rather warning people collectively about the dangers of using sleeping pills like Ambien. I could dig up some links on this if I wasn't so lazy.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Conversely, I thought she took a hugely underrated play and swamped the text with fidgety distractions. Not unenjoyably, but Jane Howell's 1985 BBC production was certainly far more relevant and consequently more interesting (at least to me).Marcel Gioberti wrote:I personally think she made an otherwise unremarkable revenge tragedy a la Thomas Kyd something not just relevant but interesting.
Then again, I watched them literally back to back when writing this, which probably isn't the best way of appreciating them!
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Not to derail the thread too much, but is said BBC production available on DVD?MichaelB wrote:Conversely, I thought she took a hugely underrated play and swamped the text with fidgety distractions. Not unenjoyably, but Jane Howell's 1985 BBC production was certainly far more relevant and consequently more interesting (at least to me).Marcel Gioberti wrote:I personally think she made an otherwise unremarkable revenge tragedy a la Thomas Kyd something not just relevant but interesting.
Then again, I watched them literally back to back when writing this, which probably isn't the best way of appreciating them!
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Yes, either separately or as part of the complete BBC Television Shakespeare package.Cold Bishop wrote:Not to derail the thread too much, but is said BBC production available on DVD?
The disc itself is barebones, though it does have optional subtitles. Picture is 4:3, sound is mono and source is clearly analogue videotape - but you wouldn't expect anything else.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
-
Roger_Thornhill
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:35 am
Daniel Day-Lewis dedicates his SAG award to Ledger.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
New pics including a better look at the new batsuit.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Marcel Gioberti
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:55 am
- Location: Torino, Italy
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Slate runs down the various problems facing Warner Brothers' in the wake of Ledger's death. Apparently, they may hire a voice actor to do some post-production voice looping that might be required. As for the marketing campaign, they had planned to start with the focus on the Joker, but segue to Two-Face as the release date drew closer anyway.
- a.khan
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 7:28 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Thank god! I beginning to worry that they'd start refocusing attention on Batman.Antoine Doinel wrote:As for the marketing campaign, they had planned to start with the focus on the Joker, but segue to Two-Face as the release date drew closer anyway.
"The Dark Knight" -- man, that's such a weak title! This film should have been called "Joker and Two-Face Screw With the Fool In the Retarded Costume."
- Mr Sausage
- Has Risen from the Grave
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:02 am
- Location: Canada
You gotta market what's new. The best advertisement for Batman himself was the first movie; now you have to convince people to go see the second one.a.khan wrote:Thank god! I beginning to worry that they'd start refocusing attention on Batman.Antoine Doinel wrote:As for the marketing campaign, they had planned to start with the focus on the Joker, but segue to Two-Face as the release date drew closer anyway.
"The Dark Knight" -- man, that's such a weak title! This film should have been called "Joker and Two-Face Screw With the Fool In the Retarded Costume."
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Having finally seen the extended IMAX footage last night, this is easily my most anticipated film of the year. It looks like the grittiest, coldest Batman film to date. The entire bank heist sequence and the reveal of the Joker is handled beautifully and it looks fantastic on IMAX. I was originally debating whether or not I would end up seeing this in IMAX (and dealing with the sold out screenings on the one screen in my area) or on a regular screen but this preview had me sold.
How much longer is it until this opens?
Harvey Dent needs your support.
How much longer is it until this opens?
Harvey Dent needs your support.
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Atlanta-ish
- Anhedionisiac
- the Displeasure Principle
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:25 pm
I'm reticient to mention this since, as far as I know, it hasn't been officially confirmed. But. There has been a lot of talk regarding the way Nolan and Aaron Eckhart have decided to deal with the role of Harvey Dent/Two-Face.
Word in the 'net is that Nolan shot complementary takes of Eckhart in Two-Face makeup so he could visually represent the duality of Dent. Meaning, he's a fifty-fifty split of the same actor giving two wildly divergent performances in the same shot. Both will be present in the shot but only one, chosen in post, will dominate at any given moment.
Is this a first? Has this ever been tried before? I cannot think of a single other instance...
Word in the 'net is that Nolan shot complementary takes of Eckhart in Two-Face makeup so he could visually represent the duality of Dent. Meaning, he's a fifty-fifty split of the same actor giving two wildly divergent performances in the same shot. Both will be present in the shot but only one, chosen in post, will dominate at any given moment.
Is this a first? Has this ever been tried before? I cannot think of a single other instance...
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact: