409 Days of Heaven
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- John Cope
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:40 pm
- Location: where the simulacrum is true
Exactly. And George Washington is not a poor anything. I also remember reading someone's observation somewhere that DGG's film took from both Malick and Harmony Korine. I think that's fair. It certainly evidences a unique fusion of sensibilities.zedz wrote:You really need to see Killer of Sheep.Nothing wrote:George Washington [is] little more than [a] poor Malick imitation.
-
you gotta be kidding me
Killer of Sheep is incredible, and yeah - one more piece of the David Gordon Green puzzle falls into place. It's embarrassing. It's embarrassing when Scorsese steals, when Kubrick steals, etc. I don't understand it. But then Malick himself owes a lot to Klimov's Come and See for The Thin Red Line.
What's interesting to me is how similar Badlands, Spirit of the Beehive and Killer of Sheep are in terms of style or at least approach, yet they were being made by three different first-time directors at entirely different locations around the world. And all are masterpieces. And all three filmmakers have very short resumes.
What's interesting to me is how similar Badlands, Spirit of the Beehive and Killer of Sheep are in terms of style or at least approach, yet they were being made by three different first-time directors at entirely different locations around the world. And all are masterpieces. And all three filmmakers have very short resumes.
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
you gotta be kidding me
Very interesting comments about the transfer - I've seen the film in the theater and the colors were markedly more subdued and subtle than the previous DVDs, I wonder if that's what the new disc will look like? Or maybe I just saw a bad, faded print. At any rate, I think it looks better with less vivid colors.
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
For sure. Lucky guy to be on nickname terms with Terrence Malick.mogwai wrote:Oh my. I didn't think it was possible, but that blog has made me even more excited for this release.
Also, confirmation for Mishima! At least I assume that if he mentions that he was working on it, then it's to be released by Criterion.
- Person
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm
I hope that we don't see too much bitching about the transfer being "wrong" if it really is "radically" different from the previous Paramount transfer. I wasn't going to but this one (I have never owned the film on home video, in fact) but now I'm thinking about it.
Also, it's great to hear that the Mishima transfer was also supervised by Bailey.
Also, it's great to hear that the Mishima transfer was also supervised by Bailey.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
I can hear you people sharpening your knives already.Lee Kline wrote:I told Terry that people were really going to be pretty surprised by this new transfer, since it was such a radical departure from before, but he said it was perfect...
...I had to see it again for myself to make sure we really did everything right, since I was still a bit nervous about how different it was from the old transfer (especially with DVD Beaver around!).
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Well, hearing any bitching whatsoever about the transfer being "wrong" would be totally absurd. "Terry" was in the room supervising it for three days. End of story.Person wrote:I hope that we don't see too much bitching about the transfer being "wrong" if it really is "radically" different from the previous Paramount transfer.
Now if people want to claim they prefer the old Paramount transfer, that is obviously their right.
- Person
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 7:00 pm
That's what I meant to say, but mangled the statement. It has not been a good week.Matt wrote:Yes, but neither Nestor Almendros nor Haskell Wexler were. I'm not saying anyone will be right to complain, just predicting that they will.jaredsap wrote:"Terry" was in the room supervising it for three days.
- magicmarker
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:21 am
-
Greathinker
-
Mental Mike
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:06 am
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Well, I think if it's been wrong these last few years, then that would be a good enough reason. Sure, Almendros and Wexler weren't there, but surely Malick can be trusted as far as the way his films should look.TedW wrote:Don't know why anybody would even contemplate fooling with it, including Malick.
-
jaredsap
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:24 am
- Location: Los Angeles
Dude, Malick didn't "mess" with DAYS OF HEAVEN. The team at Paramount responsible for the original transfer "messed" with DAYS OF HEAVEN.TedW wrote:Repertory house here in L.A. In the last couple of years, I think.
Why mess with it? The movie's a touchstone of modern cinematography for a reason.
Think about this: the brand new IP print that Criterion and Paramount struck (thereby creating the only pristine one in existence) is not where the color tweaking happened. It occurred when Malick sat in a room for three days and tried to get the Criterion transfer to look as close as possible to that print.
I've seen DAYS OF HEAVEN twice in repertory theaters, but comparing the prints that were circulating the last decade to the forthcoming Criterion transfer is simply not a worthwhile comparison. You heard it straight from Criterion's mouth: the IP from the 90s looked like crap and the original IP had chemical stains. These are what the circulating repertory prints were struck from.