Ingmar Bergman (1918-2007)

Discuss film culture and criticism
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
TomReagan
Prince of Trades
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:27 am
Location: A Pistol Hot Cup of Rhyme

#101 Post by TomReagan »

User avatar
tryavna
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

#102 Post by tryavna »

MichaelB wrote:Pollard isn't a movie critic - he's a newspaper columnist.

Seriously, it's not worth paying him more than a second's attention.
Was anyone else slightly amused that, in an article decrying the perceived pretentiousness of an artist, Pollard utilizes the rarer French spelling of hommage?
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#103 Post by MichaelB »

There's nothing remotely amusing about Stephen Pollard in any shape or form.

Just ignore him. He really isn't worth it. And if you're not convinced of this by the moronic inanity of his Bergman piece, here's his take on Michael Haneke.
portnoy
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:03 pm

#104 Post by portnoy »

In the words of Nick Pinkerton,
Is there anything more depressing/hilarious than when some douchebag, in the midst of a staggeringly inane mass culture, fancies himself to be taking the air out of stuffed-shirt phonies and razzing authority by proudly trumpeting the cause of mediocre thinking? Because, you know, any of us who grew up in flyover country have had Bresson stuffed down our throats for long enough, am I right?
User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

#105 Post by colinr0380 »

The House Next Door site's tribute to both Bergman and Antonioni.
User avatar
Gropius
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 9:47 pm

#106 Post by Gropius »

MichaelB wrote:There's nothing remotely amusing about Stephen Pollard in any shape or form.
Also a co-signatory of a wannabe British neoconservative think tank, so the US equivalent would be asking for Bill Kristol's opinions on film.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#107 Post by tavernier »

Gropius wrote:
MichaelB wrote:There's nothing remotely amusing about Stephen Pollard in any shape or form.
Also a co-signatory of a wannabe British neoconservative think tank, so the US equivalent would be asking for Bill Kristol's opinions on film.
Kristol must know more about film than he did about invading Iraq.
User avatar
orlik
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 11:17 pm
Location: London, UK

#108 Post by orlik »

portnoy wrote:In the words of Nick Pinkerton,
Is there anything more depressing/hilarious than when some douchebag, in the midst of a staggeringly inane mass culture, fancies himself to be taking the air out of stuffed-shirt phonies and razzing authority by proudly trumpeting the cause of mediocre thinking? Because, you know, any of us who grew up in flyover country have had Bresson stuffed down our throats for long enough, am I right?
Brilliantly put...And one could append to 'flyover country' any of the 'clone towns' of suburban England, decimated of any cultural specificity or variety. It's probably wrong of me to try and engage with Pollard's piece - which is pretty incompetently written by any standards, not least in its irrelevant discussion of Terence Davies - but what always amazes me is the way that such self-appointed populists present themselves as a lone, rebellious and independent voice ("the emperor has no clothes!") when all they're doing is reinforcing cultural conformity and ensuring the dominance of corporate product.

Anyway, after that rant I'm going to watch 'The Silence' (my favourite Bergman) as a slightly-delayed tribute.
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

#109 Post by Cold Bishop »

For those who don't mine parody as a means of tribute... The Colbert Report just paid "respects" to Bergman at the end of the show.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#110 Post by tavernier »

Letterman did too...showed clips from "Wild Strawberries," "Cries and Whispers" and "Weekend at Bernies."
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#111 Post by MichaelB »

One of the reasons (in fact, the only reason) that I'm so familiar with Stephen Pollard's work is because my brother has been performing a valuable service in ridiculing it whenever possible.

Here's the 'Pollardiana' section of his blog, and I reproduce the URL in full for your amusement.

(I tipped him off about the Bergman piece and this discussion, as I knew it would set him off).
User avatar
Awesome Welles
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:02 am
Location: London

#112 Post by Awesome Welles »

How can Stephen Pollard so confidently write that no one is likely to have seen a Bergman film when surely the demographic of Times Online readers is more than likely to have seen at least one film. I also fail to understand how he can so ignorantly write about Bergman when he seems to know absolutely nothing about film or anything else in general. I can only surmise from his short articles linked on Michael's brother's blog that he is a fool and should be sacked as soon as possible where he should rightly take his place writing pseudo intellectual garbage for free newspapers.
User avatar
malcolm1980
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:37 am
Location: Manila, Philippines
Contact:

#113 Post by malcolm1980 »

tavernier wrote:Letterman did too...showed clips from "Wild Strawberries," "Cries and Whispers" and "Weekend at Bernies."
Conan reran the bit they did sometime ago in honor of Bergman: Ingmar Bergman's Girls Gone Wild.
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#114 Post by domino harvey »

tavernier wrote:Letterman did too...showed clips from "Wild Strawberries," "Cries and Whispers" and "Weekend at Bernies."
this was so great
Greathinker

#115 Post by Greathinker »

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#116 Post by tavernier »

Greathinker wrote:Another from Conan
I've always felt Conan used up all his funny stuff on The Simpsons. His show always seems like Letterman-lite. (So does Letterman, nowadays.)
User avatar
malcolm1980
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:37 am
Location: Manila, Philippines
Contact:

#117 Post by malcolm1980 »

tavernier wrote:I've always felt Conan used up all his funny stuff on The Simpsons. His show always seems like Letterman-lite. (So does Letterman, nowadays.)
Rubbish! Conan's the best thing on late night these days.

But I digress. This is a Bergman thread.
User avatar
tryavna
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

#118 Post by tryavna »

malcolm1980 wrote:Rubbish! Conan's the best thing on late night these days.

But I digress. This is a Bergman thread.
I don't think it's much of a digression. I have a sneaking suspicion that
Bergman would have been a big fan of Conan's "Walker, Texas Ranger" lever.
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#119 Post by tavernier »

tryavna wrote:I don't think it's much of a digression. I have a sneaking suspicion that Bergman would have been a big fan of Conan's "Walker, Texas Ranger" lever.
Oh well...even a great artist's taste isn't infallible.
User avatar
malcolm1980
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:37 am
Location: Manila, Philippines
Contact:

#120 Post by malcolm1980 »

tavernier wrote:
tryavna wrote:I don't think it's much of a digression. I have a sneaking suspicion that Bergman would have been a big fan of Conan's "Walker, Texas Ranger" lever.
Oh well...even a great artist's taste isn't infallible.
Speaking of artist's tastes, I've read that Bergman is fan of Spielberg but finds Godard 'boring'.
User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#121 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop »

malcolm1980 wrote:Speaking of artist's tastes, I've read that Bergman is fan of Spielberg but finds Godard 'boring'.
Sounds like something Bergman say.

Doesn't look like it was mentioned yet, but Conan must've loved Bergman. He did a sketch called "Ingmar Bergman's Girls Gone Wild".
User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Portland, OR

#122 Post by Cold Bishop »

malcolm1980 wrote:Conan reran the bit they did sometime ago in honor of Bergman: Ingmar Bergman's Girls Gone Wild.
User avatar
malcolm1980
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:37 am
Location: Manila, Philippines
Contact:

#123 Post by malcolm1980 »

Stephen Colbert's own tribute to Ingmar Bergman is available on the official site.

Other Bergman parodies: Mystery Science Theater 3000 - French and Saunders - SCTV

One of my favorites though is an Animaniacs episode entitled "Meatballs or Consequences". I couldn't find the episode on-line as of now though.
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#124 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Jonathan Rosenbaum rips Ingmar a new one in the NYT

Woody's gonna have a coronary!
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#125 Post by Matt »

So, Bergman is not great because Rosenbaum doesn't understand why everyone thinks he's so great. And if the absence of one's work on DVD in America is an indicator of greatness, Rossellini must be a real hack.
Post Reply