Forthcoming Criterion & Eclipse List Discussion
-
SamSanchez
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:14 pm
- kinjitsu
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:39 pm
- Location: Uffa!
Ken Ogata recorded the original Japanese narration, and understandably, it is the version that Schrader prefers. However, for a number of reasons, the original version was not released in Japan at the time. Because the film would have had overlapping subtitles in its international version, it was decided that an English narration would be recorded. Prior to the WB DVD release, Schrader located Ogata's original narration and it was included on the DVD along with the optional English narration.Person wrote:Mishima has been OOP for almost a year. The Warner DVD featured the previously unheard (outside of Japan, where the film was barely released) Japanese voice-over. However, the original Roy Scheider voice-over for the USA release was not included, being replaced by a new, inferior voice-over by an unknown actor. Hopefully (and if its true) the Criterion edition will feature the Roy Scheider v/o. I love this movie, so it will be interesting to see what Criterion would do for it.
In any event, this is terrific news.
Last edited by kinjitsu on Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- zedz
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm
I've seen both versions (Ogata and Scheider), and the Ogata is vastly preferable, for obvious reasons, but having both on any disc is a no-brainer. I hope Criterion dedicate an extra or two to Eiko Ishioka's incredible work on this film, and Schrader will presumably be eager to contribute a commentary.
-
Narshty
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
- Location: London, UK
-
SamSanchez
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:14 pm
-
Macintosh
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: New York City
hopefully not. it's a terrible film and Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski is a macho man rendition of who the man really was.Narshty wrote:Given Criterion's great love of Barbet Schroeder, I wonder if Barfly (another Zoetrope title that Warner seems to have lost the rights to) will also appear at some point?
- TheGodfather
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Truthfully, if it means seeing some Rivette films Barbet may own, give that fucker a 3-Disc special edition.Macintosh wrote:hopefully not. it's a terrible film and Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski is a macho man rendition of who the man really was.Narshty wrote:Given Criterion's great love of Barbet Schroeder, I wonder if Barfly (another Zoetrope title that Warner seems to have lost the rights to) will also appear at some point?
EDIT: By the way, do you pronounce the "t" in Barbet?
Have we mentioned RECKLESS MOMENT as a potential Ophuls Box inclusion?
It's mentioned at the bottom of this release.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
-
LeeB.Sims
Wow, I couldn't disagree more. I think the film itself is a delightful paradox of dark themes and uplifting tone, and Rourke's performance had just the right amount of Bukowski's misogynist tendencies and sensitivity, not that I claim to know the real Bukowski. Besides, though the screenplay obviously drew from what he knew, I don't believe it was meant to be completely autobiographical. And I could be wrong, but I thought Bukowski fully endorsed Rourke's performance. Anyway, the short version of my post is this: I think Barfly would fit perfectly into the Criterion Collection and would love a better DVD release of it.Macintosh wrote:hopefully not. it's a terrible film and Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski is a macho man rendition of who the man really was.Narshty wrote:Given Criterion's great love of Barbet Schroeder, I wonder if Barfly (another Zoetrope title that Warner seems to have lost the rights to) will also appear at some point?
-
Macintosh
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: New York City
No, if you watch Bukowski: Born into this, he says that he thought Rourke's performance was too animated, and he wasn't please with it. Also, the whole experience of working on that film led him to write the novel Hollywood. Bottom line, Bukowski hated that film and had a miserable time being invloved with the production of it.LeeB.Sims wrote: I could be wrong, but I thought Bukowski fully endorsed Rourke's performance.
-
LeeB.Sims
My bad. I still like it though. "Drinks for all my friends!"
By the way, I didn't come across this info myself, but rumor has it that Luke and Owen Wilson said something about a Criterion Bottle Rocket in the future.
Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
By the way, I didn't come across this info myself, but rumor has it that Luke and Owen Wilson said something about a Criterion Bottle Rocket in the future.
Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Confirmed.LeeB.Sims wrote:By the way, I didn't come across this info myself, but rumor has it that Luke and Owen Wilson said something about a Criterion Bottle Rocket in the future.
Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
-
Mental Mike
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:06 am
As a huge Mickey Rourke fan I want to add my thoughts on Barfly..
...people say that Mickey Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski was romanticized and not the way Bukowski was in real life, BUT the character Rourke is playing is not supposed to be Bukowski, his character is Henry Chinaski!
...By assuming that Henry Chinaski is Bukowski himself is to be incorrect, and something Bukowski would most likely disagree with...Rourke's humorous and off-beat performance is misunderstood, and in his own words (in the interview included with the DVD), he says "I'm portraying someone who is dead inside, was it something that happened before? We don't know"...
...clearly he was not intending to represent Bukowski in the first place...
...people say that Mickey Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski was romanticized and not the way Bukowski was in real life, BUT the character Rourke is playing is not supposed to be Bukowski, his character is Henry Chinaski!
...By assuming that Henry Chinaski is Bukowski himself is to be incorrect, and something Bukowski would most likely disagree with...Rourke's humorous and off-beat performance is misunderstood, and in his own words (in the interview included with the DVD), he says "I'm portraying someone who is dead inside, was it something that happened before? We don't know"...
...clearly he was not intending to represent Bukowski in the first place...
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Not in the literal interpretation, no.... but Bill Lee is William Burroughs and Joe Gideon is Bob Fosse, so why not Chinaski as well?Mental Mike wrote:people say that Mickey Rourke's portrayal of Bukowski was romanticized and not the way Bukowski was in real life, BUT the character Rourke is playing is not supposed to be Bukowski, his character is Henry Chinaski!
By assuming that Henry Chinaski is Bukowski himself is to be incorrect, and something Bukowski would most likely disagree with...Rourke's humorous and off-beat performance is misunderstood, and in his own words (in the interview included with the DVD), he says "I'm portraying someone who is dead inside, was it something that happened before? We don't know"... clearly he was not intending to represent Bukowski in the first place.
- daniel p
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
The film they're there to talk about makes it seem as though it was recorded in 2005, which would make it old 'rumoured' news... could be wrong, but pretty sure on this...justeleblanc wrote:Confirmed.LeeB.Sims wrote:By the way, I didn't come across this info myself, but rumor has it that Luke and Owen Wilson said something about a Criterion Bottle Rocket in the future.
Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Macintosh
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: New York City
exactly. The way he says this line is totally off. Bukowski (or Chinaski) meant this to be sarcastic in delivery, like here are the same old drunkards again, my friends, but Rourke says it literally, in a straight forward manner.LeeB.Sims wrote:My bad. I still like it though. "Drinks for all my friends!"
-
Mental Mike
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:06 am
Macintosh, you mean Mickey Rourke delivers the line "For all my friends!" in a straightforward manner? I disagree. I think it has similarity to the beggar's Last Supper in Viridiana...watch this movie in a theatre and the whole audience is laughing when Rourke delivers the lines...I don't think most audiences take these lines seriously; they are intended to be and are recieved by and large as ironic...
- Tribe
- The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
- Tribe
- The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
- Tribe
- The Bastard Spawn of Hank Williams
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
Yes, I remember that discussion...but I don't think there was any confirmation regarding Thief of Baghdad at that time. In any event, I just think it's great news.Jeff wrote:There is further discussion of Janus' acquisition of the Korda library in the Janus thread, beginning here.
Tribe