The Dark Knight Trilogy (Christopher Nolan, 2005-2012)

Discuss specific films and franchises
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:55 am
Contact:

#101 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo »

Shall we judge Gellar's acting based on Southland Tales?
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#102 Post by Steven H »

They could get Arleen Sorkin who voiced Harley Quinn in the '92 Batman animated series:

Image
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

#103 Post by Matt »

Steven H wrote:They could get Arleen Sorkin who voiced Harley Quinn in the '92 Batman animated series:
She's already got the wardrobe, apparently.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#104 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Sarah Michelle Gellar is out....but....ERIC ROBERTS IS IN! :shock:

And for the obsessive types, here are the first "pics" of the Joker.
User avatar
flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

#105 Post by flyonthewall2983 »

My enthusiasm has just sunk a little.
Feast on me
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 9:13 am

#106 Post by Feast on me »

Antoine Doinel wrote:And for the obsessive types, here are the first "pics" of the Joker.
Those pics of the Joker have been proven to be fake later in that thread or if you are lazy you can go here
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#107 Post by Antoine Doinel »

The website has launched.
User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
Location: Denver, CO

#108 Post by Jeff »

Feast on me wrote:Those pics of the Joker have been proven to be fake later in that thread or if you are lazy you can go here
Thanks for pointing out that thread. It's filled with all sorts of hilarity. My favorite bit is when one of the posters, upset about being duped, quipped "I'm amazed that some losers don't have anything better to do." This from a man who has 1,400+ posts in a superhero forum.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#109 Post by Antoine Doinel »

User avatar
dx23
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Puerto Rico

#110 Post by dx23 »

For some reason I was stuck watching Batman Forever and didn't rememeber how badly campy and over the top Tommy Lee Jones played the Two-Face character. He didn't even played Dent, just a whacked out nowhere-near-comic book recreation of Two-Face. I like Eckhart, specially after the incredibly good Thank You for Smoking, and feel that he will bring dignity back to the Dent Jeckyll and Hyde persona.
User avatar
Musashi219
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:19 am
Location: Chicago, IL

#111 Post by Musashi219 »

User avatar
daniel p
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

#112 Post by daniel p »

patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#113 Post by patrick »

It seems that people are already freaking out about that Joker pic on other forums, I agree that I can't see Warner Bros. using that, since it definitely doesn't imply PG-13. I love the idea of a smile being carved into the Joker's face (Ichi The Killer-style) though, it's brutal and disturbing.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#114 Post by Antoine Doinel »

I LOVE the look of the Joker and since it's coming from a legit Warner Bros. site we can presume it's the one their using. And given how the MPAA works, as long as no one says "fuck" and there are no boob shots, this will be PG-13. Also, there are many ways they can imply that the smile is carved into the face without showing it directly.
User avatar
a.khan
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 7:28 am
Location: Los Angeles

#115 Post by a.khan »

Antoine Doinel wrote:And given how the MPAA works, as long as no one says "fuck" and there are no boob shots, this will be PG-13...
Oh, and nobody smoke. That includes you, Jim Gordon!
DrewReiber
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:27 am

#116 Post by DrewReiber »

Another completely random 80's star has been cast, though he's staying mum on what role exactly.

Anthony Michael Hall stays dead quiet about role in Batman saga
indy81
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:36 am

#117 Post by indy81 »

patrick wrote:I love the idea of a smile being carved into the Joker's face (Ichi The Killer-style) though, it's brutal and disturbing.
It fits the history of the comic, too. The character was originally inspired by Gwynplaine in The Man Who Laughs.
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#118 Post by patrick »

It looks like the Ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com page is down already, I know people have been speculating that it wasn't actually a Warner Bros. site since it popped up, but who knows?
eez28
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Houston

#119 Post by eez28 »

patrick wrote:It looks like the Ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com page is down already, I know people have been speculating that it wasn't actually a Warner Bros. site since it popped up, but who knows?
highlight the error page page all the way down
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#120 Post by patrick »

Wow, I just noticed that, it's seriously creepy. According to poster Christopher Lupold on the MHVF board, the letters inbetween the "HA"s spell out "seeYOuInDECeMbER," so I guess that's when the trailer is coming out.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#121 Post by Antoine Doinel »

patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#122 Post by patrick »

Doesn't IMAX film have it's own aspect ratio? If the film quality is so different, I wonder how they're going to make it work.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#123 Post by Antoine Doinel »

From what I gathered from the article, only the IMAX sequences will make full use of the entire IMAX screen.
patrick
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia

#124 Post by patrick »

From a little Wikipedia research, it looks like IMAX film is just a variant of 70mm film, but I'm sure this isn't shooting in 70mm (it would be cool though). I'm really interested to see how this plays out. I guess they'll just shrink the IMAX sequences down to 35mm for regular theaters, but how will they make up for the difference in image quality between those scenes and the rest of the film?
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#125 Post by Antoine Doinel »

Unfortunately, I doubt they'll worry about it too much. Sadly, most moviegoers put up fairly poor projection as it is. I remember going to see Starsky & Hutch and walking into the theater only to realize they were showing it on their IMAX screen (this cinema has 12 screens plus 1 IMAX screen).

I never thought I would see Owen Wilson and Ben Stiller's respective heads blown up to eight stories, but, there you have it.
Post Reply