I hate to do the Jurieu multiple-quote, call and answer thing, but this just necessary in this case (the use of boldface is incredible!).Jun-Dai wrote:I think the opportunity to work with living filmmakers that you admire probably trumps many other considerations, including the availability of the film in other regions. .
First off-- did you note the name of this thread? Did you note the lineup that this thread is discussing. Plus Lang and Murnau? Welles? We're discussing a lineup of dead filmmakers noted specifically as coming soon in the MoC catalog, which is also, primarily, chock fulla dead filmmakers.
At least I now know there's a bottom line to worry about in a profit related enterprise.Jun-Dai wrote:What's more, HerrSchreck, there's also the bottom line to worry about -- if you can produce a good edition of a popular but great film riding on the hard work of a restoration team, it would be ridiculous not to take the opportunity, even if it means postponing an unrestored, overlooked classic. MoC has the same basic considerations as Criterion but with I'd imagine a narrower margin to operate under. .
(Somewhat) seriously: MoC doesn't really ever do "restorations" (they primarily acquire digibetas), nor would I expect them to release unrestored classics, as you'll note in my example I called attention to previously unreleased films that have been restored: DER MUDE TOD, VARIETE, von Gerlachs GRIESHUS, Gremillion's MALDONE... no reels, darkrooms, scissors, glue, or chemical pans neccessary. My freindly request is for MoC to do in their silent line what they regularly do in their sound film line, so I don't understand your paragraph below whatsoever. You're constructing an argument against their own regular practice.
Please don't cop an emphatic style prior to checking your reading comprehension.
It's a wonderful thing you boldfaced all those words, as I conked my head on the floor when falling off my chair and my vision got blurry not to far in.Jun-Dai wrote:I imagine the considerations include politics (staying on the good side of important/influential people that may have an agenda when working with you, such as Michael Bay or Martin Scorsese), bottom-line (popular films pay for unpopular ones, or to put it another way, Armageddon and the like pays for all of the Paul Robesons, Vagabonds, etc.), opportunity to work with living sources (how old is Kaneto Shindo?), opportunity to ride a wave of resurgence in popularity (e.g., a Rialto release or an anniversary), etc., etc. What is available in other regions is nothing more than a single factor, and it's not in any way obviously more important than some of the other factors, as far as I'm concerned.
Nick-- don't take this sarcasm as directed into our discussion. My earlier posts to you were just friendly pieces of yearning from an appreciative customer, and even if your line stays precisely the way it is, I'll be pleased. Dreamers can always dream.