It is currently Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:30 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:24 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
Location: all up in thurr
The Life of Brian:

Image

After slaying the Arthurian legend in their now classic Holy Grail, the Pythons set their sights on the Greatest Story Ever Told. Blind faith, virgin birth, crucifixion, nothing is sacred in this epic send-up of ancient times, which draws on the cornball biblical blockbusters of the 1950s to lampoon celebrity culture in any era. Criterion has gathered the guilty parties, including John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin, for two commentary tracks as provocative and hilarious as the film itself. Available for the first time in a 16:9 enhanced transfer, Monty Python's Life of Brian can finally be viewed in all its "ahem" glory.

Special Features

- Beautiful widescreen digital transfer, approved by director Terry Jones and enhanced for widescreen televisions
- Two exclusive audio commentaries: One by Terry Gilliam, Eric Idle, and Terry Jones; the second by John Cleese and Michael Palin
- Original theatrical trailer
- Five rarely seen deleted scenes with audio commentary by the Pythons
- Four original British radio ads
- Documentary film The Pythons, shot on location during the making of Life of Brian
- English subtitles for the deaf and hearing impaired
- Optimal image quality: RSDL dual-layer edition."

Criterionforum.org user rating averages



Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:06 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Montreal
I remember reading somewhere that the video transfert is not that good.
Is it damage from the source negatives? How does it stand with Anchor Bay'sown DVD edition? Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 6:15 am 

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:55 am
The Beaver says.

Personally I think that the cc transfer is just fine, plus cc's extras are excellant and probably worth paying out the extra money for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:08 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK
It's easily one of the most popular British films ever made, subject to endless video releases, TV screenings and cinema re-issues, so it's not at all surprising that the original elements Criterion had were in a slightly worn, grainy state (the fact the film was shot on the sort of notoriously unreliable stock issued throughout the late 70s on a low budget in a very hot country is another factor to take into consideration).

The image looks fine to me (it's not the sort of film one watches for the exquisite cinematography anyway; it's meant to have a rather hot, dusty look to it, evident in Criterion's transfer supervised by Terry Jones, but not in the UK disc with a completely natural colour palette) and the extras are totally essential.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 6:36 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:06 pm
I've always said that Life of Brian has to be one of the most poorly made films of all time. The script is brilliant but the direction, staging, and composition are awful, the photography grainy and sloppy, and the audio muddy and difficult to hear. The Criterion DVD is a fabulous transfer of film and audio elements that totally suck.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 10:10 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:21 pm
Location: a long the riverrun
Narshty wrote:
...but not in the UK disc with a completely natural colour palette...

There's nothing natural about the R2 disc's color, it's far too blue and cold.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 3:19 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK
BWilson wrote:
I've always said that Life of Brian has to be one of the most poorly made films of all time. The script is brilliant but the direction, staging, and composition are awful, the photography grainy and sloppy, and the audio muddy and difficult to hear.

I can't say I've ever has troubling hearing the dialogue, but to complain about the technical aspects of the film is a little beside the point. Terry Jones films what is funny (and, crucially, doesn't place undue stress on background or throwaway gags) which is really all that's important. It's like complaining about Edward Cline's "pedestrian" mise-en-scene or Milton Krasner's "workmanlike" cinematography on The Bank Dick - it's a style of comedy entirely focused around the script and performances.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:19 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:06 pm
Here's an excellent example of how bad the audio is:

The "What have the Romans ever done for us?" scene. Watch this scene in the film and then watch The Pythons documentary where you see the scene being rehearsed and shot. The audio is much more easily understood in the documentary, with each speaker being clearly understood.

Narshty, I understand your point and agree, but I will say that the mis-en-scene is considerably better in Holy Grail and Meaning of Life.

The mismatched editing of material that was half location and half studio reshoots is terribly obvious ("Alms for an ex-leper"), and the awkward composition and shitty day for night of the "Romans Go Home" scene (caused by Cleese's stubbornness) really hurt the film. By "hurt" I mean it would have been funnier if the technical gaffs weren't so distractingly awful.

Furthermore, Terry Gilliam never fails to note about Terry Jones' complete disregard for his detailed sets which sound very cool (as described by Gilliam) yet go completely unseen in the film.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 9:47 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:27 pm
Location: London, UK
BWilson wrote:
Furthermore, Terry Gilliam never fails to note about Terry Jones' complete disregard for his detailed sets which sound very cool (as described by Gilliam) yet go completely unseen in the film.

But it's definitely not the sort of film where one's attention should be focused on the lush backdrops! I've probably seen the film half-a-dozen times or so, and I can honestly say I've never noticed the location/studio reshoot problems you cite. Yes, the "Romans go home" scene is obviously day-for-night, but - so what? Not trying calling you some sort of uptight stickler in comparison, but I really don't require technical perfection to fully immerse myself in a film, especially when it's as painfully funny as Life of Brian.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:08 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
"I am the Messiah!... Now fuck off!"
"How should we 'fuck off', oh Lord?"

Oops, wrong thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 8:09 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Narshty wrote:
BWilson wrote:
Furthermore, Terry Gilliam never fails to note about Terry Jones' complete disregard for his detailed sets which sound very cool (as described by Gilliam) yet go completely unseen in the film.

But it's definitely not the sort of film where one's attention should be focused on the lush backdrops! I've probably seen the film half-a-dozen times or so, and I can honestly say I've never noticed the location/studio reshoot problems you cite. Yes, the "Romans go home" scene is obviously day-for-night, but - so what? Not trying calling you some sort of uptight stickler in comparison, but I really don't require technical perfection to fully immerse myself in a film, especially when it's as painfully funny as Life of Brian.


Yes I'd agree with that - its like complaining that the spaceship sequence has crummy special effects - it just makes it funnier! That and the car engine noises for the spacecraft which is up there with the noise of the plane in Airplane! as the funniest use of an engine sound in comedy!

Surely part of the reason for the crumminess of the look is a piss-take of all those epic films where its obvious they were shot in a studio, or done day-for night, or have a Roman soldier with a wrist watch on etc! The same thing with the accents, was a Cockney singing on a cross in Biblical times? - no, its another take on the use of things like American accents in epic films - wasn't it John Wayne in The Greatest Story Ever Told who drawls "Truly that was the son of God" (!)

I especially like the opening scene with half the crowd not being able to hear Jesus and putting their own interpretation on what he's saying. Its a good pastiche on those films (a Criterion example would be Spartacus addressing the other slaves, which is openly quoted in the "I'm Spartacus!"/"I'm Brian, and so's my wife!" scene) where the leader addresses the troops and everyone can hear them perfectly! Its also an early indication before Brian becomes mistaken for the Messiah, of how misunderstanding can be a dangerous thing, something that applies as much to film criticism as religion! I love the later scene with the followers breaking into factions, one following the gourd, the other the shoe!

"Myrrh? What are you giving him Myrrh for? It might bite him!"

Of course for all the excellent commentary on religion we also get the plain nuts (spaceship) and naughty jokes!

"Do you laugh when I mention my friend. . . Biggus. . . Dikkus? He has a wife you know!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 1:22 pm 

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:06 pm
I wouldn't say the technical problems were intentional. Just listen to the commentary, there's considerable comment on the technical problems they had and the "fixes" they had to perform in haste. The bad day-for-night for example was a result of Cleese insisting on shooting him from one particular side and could have been avoided if he'd been more flexible. On a technical level Brian is their most flawed film, but it's script is probably their best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: New Jersey
Via yahoo.com:

Quote:
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - PBS will be the home for six new Monty Python specials this spring. Each special will focus on a member of the British comedy troupe, mixing new footage with clips from Python movies and the group's television series.

American audiences first discovered Monty Python on public television after PBS obtained the rights to the sketch comedy series "Monty Python's Flying Circus" from the BBC in the 1970s, said John Wilson, PBS' senior vp and co-chief programming executive.

The new series, spotlighting Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Terry Gilliam, Michael Palin and Terry Jones, will be called "Monty Python's Personal Best" and is being produced by Python (Monty) Pictures Ltd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:53 pm 
FAQ: "Man or Astroman?"

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:31 pm
If I'm not mistaken, assuming they're the same as the PBS shows, I think these are already slated for dvd release, two of which, Michael Palin's and Eric Idle's, are due next month.

Even better, I think, is the imminent, overdue R1 releases of Do Not Adjust Your Set, At Last the 1948 Show, and Ripping Yarns. Really looking forward to these.

Sorry somewhat off-topic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut
Ripping Yarns. I've been dying to see those. I've only read the scripts. Maybe a potential Criterion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:14 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Just a post to mention that the sketch the Not The Nine O'Clock News show did that parodied the controversy about Life of Brian is on YouTube!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:25 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Sony will be releasing a SE on Blu-Ray and 2-disc SD-DVD on November 6.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:15 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:32 am
Location: Italy
Person wrote:
Sony will be releasing a SE on Blu-Ray and 2-disc SD-DVD on November 6.

All the prints I've seen look like shit,so it would be interesting to see how people will react once they see all the flaws in glorious high definition.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:29 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
All video transfers have also been less than great, too. They all look too grainy to me and the skin tones are far too red on the current Sony DVD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Person wrote:
Sony will be releasing a SE on Blu-Ray and 2-disc SD-DVD on November 6.

So will the Criterion and Anchor Bay editions go OOP? Exactly who owns the rights to this film? I thought this was one of the HandMade Films that George Harrison's estate owns.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:53 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
I have no idea who owns the rights. In Canada (not sure about the States) Sony released Life of Brian on DVD but the Criterion one can still be purchased, as far as I know anyways. While the Sony one still used a shitty print, the image, from what I can remember, did look better than the Criterion one overall.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:53 pm 

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 4:44 pm
More news and artwork about Brian.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
The commentaries are ported over, has some new extras.
And much cheaper. I will probably be upgrading the Criterion.

Strange that Sony went for the 2 commentary tracks for this (and Holy Grail) but not for Taxi Driver....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 2:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:48 am
Location: Athens, Greece
I just bought the R2 Sony 2-disc SE version even though I also have the Criterion Version.

As far as I can say the transfer is a lot better, but of course it is not perfect by any means.

The sound is also a lot more fuller since it is 5.1 of course.

As far as the extras go, I haven't heard the script reading but I saw the new documentary and it is very good. I much prefer it from the original 1978 doc that is included in the Criterion. mainly because it has many details about the controversy and the reactions that the film caused upon its release. By the way, the deleted scenes have the same terrible transfers.

In conclusion, I thing the new SE is better than the Criterion and I am happy that I doubled-dipped. Of course I will keep my Criterion disc too.(I can't believe I double-dipped a Criterion disc). :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:59 pm
Is the new Brian only in HD or BluRay or whatever?

Yes, I have 20th century technology and haven't bought a new tv and new dvd player yet.

Re-releases like Brian and Baron Mucnhausen will force me to, yes?

Hum... Must be a new drive I can buy for the computer that can play BluRay. Or the old drive with new software?

Oy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adam, miless


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection