On Beaver now...
Pioneer - Region 0 - NTSC "
Shadows" vs. Optimum (6-disc - The John Cassavetes Collection) - Region 2 - PAL vs. Criterion Boxset (8 discs - Cassavetes- 5 Films) - Region 0 - NTSC
Optimum (The John Cassavetes Collection) - Region 2 - PAL "
Faces" vs. Criterion (Cassavetes - 5 Films) - Region 0 - NTSC vs. Pioneer - Region 0 - NTSC
Optimum (The John Cassavetes Collection) - Region 2 - PAL "
A Woman Under the Influence" vs. Pioneer - Region 0 - NTSC (*DVD10) vs. Criterion Boxset (8 discs) - Region 0 - PAL
Optimum (The John Cassavetes Collection - Long) - Region 2 - PAL "
The Killing of a Chinese Bookie" vs. Criterion (Cassavetes - 5 Films) - Region 0 - NTSC vs. Pioneer - Region 0 - NTSC
Optimum (The John Cassavetes Collection) - Region 2 - PAL "
Opening Night" vs. Pioneer - Region 0 - NTSC vs. Criterion (John Cassavetes: Five Films) - Region 0 - NTSC
The image quality of the Optimum's compares favorably with the Criterions and they have some different extras including scene select commentaries by Bogdanovich. But our 'bone of contention' is that
Faces is stretched to suit anamorphicity from 1.66 ratio to 1.78. Our reliable source has backed this up.
Criterion (1.66)
Optimum - (stretched from 1.66 to suit 1.78)
We hardly ever point the finger at other reviewers as I'm sure we make a fair share of errors, but:
From DVDTimes:
Quote:
We get the film anamorphically enhanced at a ratio of 1.78:1 and looking near perfect. ... clarity of the image and its cleanliness which is important, and both are flawless, as are the contrast levels. Rather, the only problem to speak of is some intermittent flicker.
This is probably more of a accolade for DVD comparisons than a jab at a fellow reviewer who obvioulsy missed this large flaw. I guess Optimum missed it too... (are there no quality controls?)
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/
Best,
Gary