It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 8:45 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:08 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
I found this article on the Wall Street journal. It mostly applies to television, but I'm hopeful that "The Conformist," "1900," and other much demanded titles be released soon:

Quote:
As Viacom inc. contunues to turn around its Paramount Pictures movie studio under new management, it has one key advantage: the old management's cautious approach to exploiting the studio's DVD library.

DVD sales of television and movie hits have been Hollywood cash cows for the past several years. But under the leadership of former Viacom Entertainment Group Chairman Jonathan Dolgen, Paramount was slow to embrace the boom because of concerns over piracy. Instead, the studio opted to hold many of its titles back for a rainy day.

That rainy day is here -- and the dousing was so bad that Mr. Dolgen and longtime studio creative chief Sherry Lansing have been swept out of their jobs because of the studio's mediocre performance. Now Viacom co-President Tom Freston and new Paramount chief Brad Grey are looking for ways to revive the studio's fortunes, and selling DVDs is one quick and ready strategy.

Other studios, having aggressively mined their A-list and B-list catalog, are rushing out new properties like "The O.C.: Complete Season 1" within months of their original airing. Paramount, in contrast, still has a slew of unexploited vintage franchises to distribute, both on the movie and TV fronts. The studio is set to unleash a host of classics this year, including "Happy Days," "The Brady Bunch" and "The Beverly Hillbillies," followed later by shows such as "Beverly Hills 90210" and "Melrose Place."

The old 1980s show "MacGyver" is another one Paramount has up its sleeve. Viacom is expected to whip up some $15 million in sales and $5 million of profit from DVDs of "MacGyver," an action-adventure series about a troubleshooter who could disarm nuclear missiles with a paper clip or stop an acid leak with a Hershey bar. Similarly, the DVD series of "Charmed," a more recent show about three witch sisters, is expected to generate more than $60 million in sales and some $15 million in profit.

On the movie side, after bringing out some of its older library, Paramount is readying a big gambit on John Wayne movies. The Duke made a lot of movies for Paramount, and now the studio has consolidated many of his other films by acquiring a library called Batjac. The aim is to introduce new viewers to one of the studio's biggest stars, with titles including "The High and the Mighty" and "Hondo." At the same time, Paramount is pumping out a slug of other Westerns, as well as classics such as "The African Queen," and a more aggressive slate of special editions of newer movies, from "Titanic" to "Airplane!"

If Paramount's strategy works, analysts estimate its contribution to Viacom's bottom line could increase significantly, a welcome relief at a time when the company's radio business is stagnating. The first effects of the new DVD strategy are expected to be visible in Viacom's 2004 results, set to be released tomorrow.

Tom Lesinski, who is leading Viacom's DVD efforts as head of Paramount's home-entertainment division, articulates the new strategy as essentially fourfold: building Viacom's library with acquisitions like the Batjac and PBS catalogs; tapping high-margin TV and movie titles across Viacom; aggressively repricing titles; and doing deals like a recent one with Hasbro for the long-term rights to distribute videos based on properties such as G.I. Joe.

"Our strategy is designed to outpace the already solid growth in the DVD industry," he says.

Paramount had a 10% share of the $15 billion of catalog and new- release DVD sales in the U.S. last year, compared with 21% for Time Warner Inc.'s Warner Bros. and almost 16% for Walt Disney Co., according to DVD Exclusive research. Paramount estimates that 53% of its movie catalog and 95% of its TV library have yet to be released on DVD. The studio is expected to deliver 25%-30% growth in movie and TV DVD sales this year, with margins reaching as much as 50%. World-wide home-video revenue for Viacom properties is estimated to be around $3 billion.

Viacom's move comes just as DVD sales growth is poised to tail off. PriceWaterhouseCoopers estimates DVD growth will moderate in 2006, dropping to mid-single digits in 2007-2008. That said, sales of TV DVDs are expected to continue to show strong growth. Studios are also hoping that a less mature international market will pick up any slowdown of movie DVD sales in the U.S.

With so many titles scrapping for shelf space, Paramount's offerings will need to stand out from the crowd. Paramount hopes to improve its chances at the checkout by spending more on DVD marketing and cutting prices.

By waiting so long, Paramount missed out on the higher prices when DVD sales first took off. Defending his strategy, Mr. Dolgen says: "We had a rolling three-year plan of projects so that we could release our catalog in an orderly way." For instance, he argues that if Paramount had released "The Godfather" on DVD in 1998, instead of when it did in 2002, the movie wouldn't have been as successful, because DVD-player penetration was still in its infancy in the 1990s.

The biggest boost ahead is expected to come from TV DVDs. Viacom already has a thriving kids DVD business, thanks to Nickelodeon. While Paramount released 35 TV DVDs in 2002, that will jump to 220 this year. As a general rule, TV DVDs are more profitable to a studio. However, the expense of renegotiating the actors and producers, and clearing the music rights, can sometimes cut into profits. On the first season of "Happy Days," for instance, it cost almost $1 million just to get the music clearance.


Last edited by Dylan on Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
I just hope that rushing out doesn't mean half-ass DVD releases for Paramount.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: New Jersey
With all due respect to you, dx23, the phrase that springs to mind is, "and how would that differ from their current methods of production?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:01 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:09 pm
Better late then never I suppose but I hope that as they look at the DVD landscape, they look to the studios which do the format proud...comapnies like Warner & Fox instead of companies that don't always produce the best product like Universal & Sony.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:55 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: WoopWoop
Let me remind you'all.... IN 1998 a year after the birth of DVD, Paramout and Disney Corp were still reticent (to say the least) aboiut the format. For this reason, and Paramount's appalling reputation with film Preservation they have been parvenus to the world of DVD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: La Mar Azul
Truly...what the Hell kind of lackwit looks at these options...

A. releasing material that they have the rights to, for which there is a demand or...

B. Not...

...and sees a choice?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:29 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
flixyflox wrote:
For this reason, and Paramount's appalling reputation with film Preservation they have been parvenus to the world of DVD.

hmm...but I guess a year or two of getting their act together, preserving some films and producing some high quality releases could end up with them being lauded for their efforts with no thought to their previous lacklustre performance (although it depends on them actually doing that!)

[best Charlton Heston/Armageddon voice]
it has happened before...it will happen again[/Heston]!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:46 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Quote:
With all due respect to you, dx23, the phrase that springs to mind is, "and how would that differ from their current methods of production?"

Neuro, I thought of that after typing my first post, but in all fairness, Paramount DVDs can be found cheap in bargain bins and some of them, like The Talented Mr. Ripley, have decent extras and are worth the $5.50 . On the other hand, they have a long, long way to go to be near the Warner Home Video standard. I'm still waiting for Special Editions of The Warriors and Mission Impossible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:34 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:18 pm
Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
Their prices are a bit unven too. You can get The Duellists and The Conversation for 10 bucks and they're loaded with extras, however Parallax View doesn't have any extras and is 20 bucks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:15 pm 

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 2:51 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
good; maybe this means we'll see The Conformist, 1900, A New Leaf and The Big Carnival in the near future....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Connecticut
Big Carnival for sure, how can they NOT release that film???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:35 pm 
Waster of Cinema
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
Quote:
The Big Carnival

"Ace in the Hole", please: I hate that alternate title! :wink:

The Passenger is an MGM title and is, thus, owned by Warner. Zabriskie Point is on the way, so it surely stands to reason that The Passenger is also coming?

Paramount made a transfer of The Conformist about three years ago, which was supervised and approved by cinematographer, Vittorio Storaro, but has not be released due to the restored party scene not being originally dubbed in English. Here's the solution, Paramount: release the film with Italian track only, or use branching - just get it out already.

Malcolm McDowell and screenwriter David Sherwin recorded commentaries for If... about three years ago, also. Why this much-demanded film is still not on DVD is one of the great Home Video Mysteries, folks.

Once the Republic libary is fully in Paramount's hands, expect SEs of High Noon, It's a Wonderful Life, The Quiet Man. Info [url=www.paramount.com/filmpreservation/projectsrep.html
]here[/url].

Strangely, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is not on that list. It was shot and composed in 1.37:1 but has never been shown that way. The SuperScope 2:1 formating was an after-thought in post-production and Siegel fought it, but producer, Walter Wanger had his way. Any future DVD ought to have the 1.37:1 framing (a 2:1 version on another disc or on the other side could also be included to avoid confusion and anger!).

Info on other Paramount titles here.

I'm looking forward to a press release for 3rd and 4th quarter from Paramount...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 9:30 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
The reasons for not releasing "The Conformist" still don't make any sense. Anybody who loves the film doesn't care about the English dub. This would be like Criterion not releasing "The Leopard" because the additional scenes in the Italian version were never dubbed into English. Besides, English dubs are usually awful and screw up the film badly. If they really want that English dub out there, they should release it as a 2 disc set, with the second disc being the US theatrical cut.

However, what is even more baffling is why every other DVD region in the world are following the trend of avoiding a release (besides the long out of print Japanese DVD that nobody can fine). It'll get out there eventually.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:07 pm 
Waster of Cinema
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
Pinch of salt time, folks (last post at bottom). I reckon we will see The Conformist on DVD this year, but I will have to see a press release before I get excited.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:29 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Gordon, thank you!

From the IMDB poster:

Yesterday I spoke to someone at Paramount who would know and he expects the release by this August (2005). He said the film has been remastered and that one scene that Bertolucci originally cut has been restored in context. I'd never heard of this missing scene, but I think my contact called it "the blind man scene."

Legally, the issue has been the question of owenership: I didn't retain all the details but after Gulf + Western (whom he called Engulf + Devour) bought everything up and then sold it again, the rights were impossible to sort out, further complicated by some tiny Austrian investor in the film who had certain rights. Sigh. Long story short, the work has been done for a remastered, subtitled, DVD release. All that remains is the release itself.
I certainly hope this is accurate. 2005 is shaping up to be an unbelievably magnificent year for DVD releases.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:57 pm 
Waster of Cinema
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
I'm more than happy to please a fellow Alain Delon fan, Dylan! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:25 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:01 pm
Location: WoopWoop
The "blind man" scene was left in some prints (indcluding a French Lang print which Paramount released originally in Australia and elsewhere.) THe Italian lang print was missing it in several recent reissues here and there. I understood Bertolucci decided to cut it himself, but it is worth having back.

Polybius wrote:
Truly...what the Hell kind of lackwit looks at these options...

A. releasing material that they have the rights to, for which there is a demand or...

B. Not...

...and sees a choice?

Polybius - I actually have no idea what you mean.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:26 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: La Mar Azul
flixyflox wrote:
Polybius - I actually have no idea what you mean

Okay. I wrote...

Quote:
Truly...what the Hell kind of lackwit looks at these options...

A. releasing material that they have the rights to, for which there is a demand or...

B. Not...

...and sees a choice?

Which seems, to my eyes, a pretty straightforward question regarding the old Paramount policy described thusly...

Quote:
the old management's cautious approach to exploiting the studio's DVD library.

DVD sales of television and movie hits have been Hollywood cash cows for the past several years. But under the leadership of former Viacom Entertainment Group Chairman Jonathan Dolgen, Paramount was slow to embrace the boom because of concerns over piracy. Instead, the studio opted to hold many of its titles back for a rainy day.

That seems incredibly foolish and shortsighted. If you have material that people want to buy and own and you refuse to sell it, it seems like a less than stellar business practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:34 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Polybius,

It's a very good point. What ends up happening is that people then spend a lot of money buying tons of bad quality videos of TV shows that were taped off of TV a long time ago.

In a related note, I'm really waiting for Universal to release the Alfred Hitchcock Hour, which was, in my opinion, the most consistantly outstanding TV show in history (I mean, come on, who can forget "The Jar?"). I bought a VHS tape of that episode a few years ago, and it's sufficient for now (it's a great, unique piece, with a chilling Herrmann score), but this is terrific stuff that is long overdue for DVD. But since Universal hasn't even gotten around to releasing "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" yet, I imagine we'll have to wait another three or four years (or longer) for the "Hour" episodes to emerge.

But Paramount and Universal are very well known for sitting on everything they have in their vaults.

Dylan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:32 pm
Does anyone know who owns the rights to the Dragnet series, and if there are any plans of releasing good editions on DVD? Sorry not trying to do a wish list, i just didn't know if perhaps Paramount might have the rights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Quote:
DVD sales of television and movie hits have been Hollywood cash cows for the past several years. But under the leadership of former Viacom Entertainment Group Chairman Jonathan Dolgen, Paramount was slow to embrace the boom because of concerns over piracy. Instead, the studio opted to hold many of its titles back for a rainy day.

After re-reading this, I just came to the conclusion that this has to be one of the lamest excuse in DVD and business history. All studios have concern about piracy, and not releasing their catalog titles will only make people buy bad quality videos, like Dylan said. That is the same reason there are a lot of bootlegs of Disney Animated Classics that are currently OOP and in their vaults. What Dolgen did was help his ass get fired for his bad decisions.

Quote:
But Paramount and Universal are very well known for sitting on everything they have in their vaults.

To help your quote, Dylan

From the George Feltenstein interview on the Onion:
Quote:
The problem is that most of the people at the studios who are making these decisions know nothing about film. There are exceptions, but a lot of them may as well be selling shoe polish or potatoes or toothpaste. They're strictly thinking of it as a packaged-goods business, and not looking at it as selling entertainment.

Paramount and Universal are guilty of the practice of hiring people who don't know shit about films and DVDs. These are the same people who believe that black and white films are unpopular and outdated and that believe in the Ted Turner colorization system. As long a companies like these continue hiring imbeciles like Dolgen, who would sell you DVDs as goods instead of being sold as classic art or simply as films, we are going to get companies that really don't care about their catalogs unless it helps them make an 1000% gross revenue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:35 pm 
Waster of Cinema
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
Quote:
In a related note, I'm really waiting for Universal to release the Alfred Hitchcock Hour, which was, in my opinion, the most consistantly outstanding TV show in history (I mean, come on, who can forget "The Jar?").

I am also waiting. And waiting. And waiting for Universal to wake up and release The Alfred Hitchcock Hour. How can they not realise that this would be a pretty big seller? Hitchcock DVDs must surely be among the biggest 'classic' sellers, no?

I heard a rumour late last year that Universal are planning on remastering all of their Hitchcock films in hi-def, but nothing has come to pass. I can't really bring myself to watch my Psycho DVD anymore. I just know how much better it could look. When it first came out, it was a "great transfer", but in the interim, things have got so much better and when you see compare it to all the great transfers of late-Fifties, early-Sixties black and white films, like Eyes Without a Face or L'Eclisse, it doesn't hold up well. But the extras are great, so it will always be a keeper.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 1:45 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: La Mar Azul
Dylan wrote:
It's a very good point. What ends up happening is that people then spend a lot of money buying tons of bad quality videos of TV shows that were taped off of TV a long time ago.

In a related note, I'm really waiting for Universal to release the Alfred Hitchcock Hour, which was, in my opinion, the most consistantly outstanding TV show in history (I mean, come on, who can forget "The Jar?"). I bought a VHS tape of that episode a few years ago, and it's sufficient for now (it's a great, unique piece, with a chilling Herrmann score), but this is terrific stuff that is long overdue for DVD. But since Universal hasn't even gotten around to releasing "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" yet, I imagine we'll have to wait another three or four years (or longer) for the "Hour" episodes to emerge.

But Paramount and Universal are very well known for sitting on everything they have in their vaults.

That's the point. I think they should have people looking for what is selling in bootleg form on eBay, not so much to sic the law on them, but just to see what people want. I've never understood how people can't grasp that bootleg buyers would really, really prefer official releases. They're potential customers, not n'er do wells just looking to piss you off.

I would really like to have a chance at that hour long Alfred Hitchcock Presents episode Memo from Purgatory with the Harlan Ellison script and the early James Caan performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:23 pm 
Waster of Cinema
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:03 am
Quote:
I've never understood how people can't grasp that bootleg buyers would really, really prefer official releases. They're potential customers, not n'er do wells just looking to piss you off.

This is one of the great home video enigmas. And it frustrated the fuck out of me. Robinson Crusoe on Mars LD selling for $300 on Ebay and DVDr rips selling for $50. Man, doesn't that SAY something, Paramount?

The Reflecting Skin, starring a mega-idol like Viggo Mortensen just sitting on the shelf? DVDrs from the excellent LD transfer going for hefty dough, as well? Madness. The film freaks that buy those illicit discs would much rather pay $15 for an anamorphic transfer with extras, don't you think, Miramax, BBC, or whoever owns the rights?! Duh. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:52 am 
Holy smokes. #1 DVD on Amazon, at the moment.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection