It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 11:06 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:54 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:55 pm
Movies Unlimited has this up for pre-order, with a street date of October 23rd. Two disc set; no specs yet.

-BJ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
Excellent. I just thought of the film last night while I was watching Time after time. Thanks for posting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: North Carolina
Brilliant news!

Thanks to Malcolm McDowell for coaxing Warner to do this. Now we'll finally have all three of the "Travis Trilogy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:09 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Wow, two discs is a bit unexpected, I was assuming they would just rush out a single disc with nothing but commentary to appease Malcolm McDowell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 6:02 am
Location: London
patrick wrote:
Wow, two discs is a bit unexpected, I was assuming they would just rush out a single disc with nothing but commentary to appease Malcolm McDowell.

I thought it would be vanilla. Perhaps this will contain Mike Kaplan's new documentary on Anderson which played at Cannes?

This is spectacular news, I can't wait.


Last edited by Awesome Welles on Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:13 pm 
"Without obsession, life is nothing"
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
Location: Sitting End
patrick wrote:
Wow, two discs is a bit unexpected, I was assuming they would just rush out a single disc with nothing but commentary to appease Malcolm McDowell.

Exactly. OLM is getting the kind of treatment I was expecting they'd give to Performance, which I'm still not forgiving them for going all out on the extras. Not even a commentary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:13 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Hopefully, disc two will be Jan Harlan's, O Lucky Malcolm (2006).

Too much good DVD news this week! Scary!

DVD Empire listing

Quote:
Video: Widescreen 1.78:1 Color (Anamorphic)
Audio: ENGLISH: Dolby Digital Mono [CC]
Subtitles: English, French

Studio: Warner Bros.
Production Year: 1973
Release Date: 10/23/2007

Length: 178 mins
Rating: NR
Number of Discs: 2
Item Code: 120031
UPC Code: 085391200314

IMDb lists the running time as 183 mintes - that's the original "X-rated" UK cut. The Cannes Premier ran 192 minutes. The 1995 Warner USA, NTSC VHS ran 173 minutes. The 1995 NTSC Laserdisc ran 178 minutes; the extra 5 minutes are of the "My Home Town" sequence. I don't know what the 183-minute version adds - or what was cut from the 192-minute Cannes cut. Malcolm will know.

A 30-minute behind-the-scenes was made during filming and was shown on U.S. TV before the film's release.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:20 pm
Surely it's not a coincidence that this is scheduled for release the exact same day as A Clockwork Orange. I'd love to see the terms of the agreement WB had with McDowell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 8:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Malcolm on Conan O'Brian in 1993: Part 1 - Part 2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:46 am 

Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Los Angeles
Lino wrote:
patrick wrote:
Wow, two discs is a bit unexpected, I was assuming they would just rush out a single disc with nothing but commentary to appease Malcolm McDowell.

Exactly. OLM is getting the kind of treatment I was expecting they'd give to Performance, which I'm still not forgiving them for going all out on the extras. Not even a commentary.

PRINCE OF THE CITY's nearly three hour runtime was split across two discs, but the set contained no extras besides the trailer and a half-hour featurette. Given O LUCKY MAN!'s similarly epic length, there's no reason to assume that two discs means WHV has rolled out the red carpet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:10 am
Location: Atlanta
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:39 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO
For the squinting impaired:

Quote:
* Commentary by Malcolm McDowell, Alan Price, and screenwriter David Sharwin

* New Feature-Length Career Profile, O Lucky Malcolm!, Produced/Directed by Jan Harlan, Edited by Katia de Vidas

* Vintage Featurette: O Lucky Man! Innovations in Entertainment

* Theatrical Trailer

I'm sure it was a contractual thing to get the rights to the documentary, but how bizarre is it that Katia de Vidas, who apparently hasn't done much of anything but shoot and edit this doc gets credit on the features block? I'm sure people will say, "Oooh, edited by Katia de Vidas! That must be good."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:15 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am
A little Googling turns up this page which mentions a documentery made by De Vidas called Stanley Kubrick: The Exhibition about that touring exhibition of props & such from the estate. Maybe it will turn up somewhere in the new Kubrick set.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:45 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Looks terrific, although I would have liked to have gotten the Anderson doc mentioned above as opposed to the McDowell one - although I'm interested to hear what McDowell has to say about some of the crap he's been in over the last 25 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:13 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:00 pm
Just what I wished for! O, what lucky men we are! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 9:57 am
What a horrible, horrible cover, though I appreciate the release to discover this McDowell-Anderson classic along with If...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:10 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 7:18 pm
Jeff wrote:
Quote:
* New Feature-Length Career Profile, O Lucky Malcolm!, Produced/Directed by Jan Harlan, Edited by Katia de Vidas

I'm sure it was a contractual thing to get the rights to the documentary, but how bizarre is it that Katia de Vidas, who apparently hasn't done much of anything but shoot and edit this doc gets credit on the features block? I'm sure people will say, "Oooh, edited by Katia de Vidas! That must be good."

Perhaps she's a Harlan "protege."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:13 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:47 pm
Location: Drearington
Glass wrote:
What a horrible, horrible cover

Why horrible? It's based on the original poster. What's there to dislike about McDowell's grin?

As for the film, I think O Lucky Man! is probably the best (certainly most innovative) British film of the 70s (not that there's a great deal of competition), although I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the musical interludes. I know they're supposed to be Brechtian, but that 'light rock' style has dated less well than the rest of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
Gropius wrote:
As for the film, I think O Lucky Man! is probably the best (certainly most innovative) British film of the 70s (not that there's a great deal of competition)

I'm a big fan of O Lucky Man! too, and it's probably my favourite Anderson, but don't write off British filmmaking of the time. The Bill Douglas Trilogy is one of the great achievements in British film of any era, and this is also the period when Terence Davies and Alan Clarke arrived and Greenaway did his best work. It's just that the best and most innovative filmmaking was on the independent margins (Douglas, Davies, Greenaway, Overlord) or on television (Clarke, Leigh, Loach, Blue Remembered Hills).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Gropius wrote:
Glass wrote:
What a horrible, horrible cover

Why horrible? It's based on the original poster. What's there to dislike about McDowell's grin?

Yes, that is based on the original one-sheet. I certainly don't think it's horrible, and even kind of like the charming goofiness, but I would have preferred the 70s vibe of this alternate art.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:06 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:47 pm
Location: Drearington
zedz wrote:
I'm a big fan of O Lucky Man! too, and it's probably my favourite Anderson, but don't write off British filmmaking of the time. The Bill Douglas Trilogy is one of the great achievements in British film of any era, and this is also the period when Terence Davies and Alan Clarke arrived and Greenaway did his best work. It's just that the best and most innovative filmmaking was on the independent margins (Douglas, Davies, Greenaway, Overlord) or on television (Clarke, Leigh, Loach, Blue Remembered Hills).

All good points, but I was thinking in terms of feature films. I recently saw the Douglas trilogy actually, and agree that considered as a trilogy, it is possibly a greater stylistic achievement than even O Lucky Man!, but none of its individual parts, apart from the last, are really feature length. Ditto Greenaway's medium-length shorts (which are still too long to be eligible for your List Project, by the way); Davies's 'arrival' consists of one short, which in my opinion seems amateurish next to the first part of Douglas's trilogy.

The question of length would be irrelevant (the 70s were clearly a great time for short film) if it weren't indicative of the lack of funding/resources which has dogged innovative British filmmaking for the last half a century.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:36 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:19 pm
Gropius wrote:
although I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the musical interludes. I know they're supposed to be Brechtian, but that 'light rock' style has dated less well than the rest of it.

I don't think I'd classify the Alan Price songs as "light rock". They are a good, not great, set of songs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 12:38 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
O LUCKY MALCOLM! is also on the Clockwork Orange SE, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO
manicsounds wrote:
O LUCKY MALCOLM! is also on the Clockwork Orange SE, isn't it?

Yes. It is featured as a supplement on both films.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:38 pm 

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:02 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY
I am not a fan of the songs either, but "Poor People" has played in my head at least once a day for the past 15 years. It's an awful song too.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection