Movies Unlimited has this up for pre-order, with a street date of October 23rd. Two disc set; no specs yet.

-BJ

Excellent. I just thought of the film last night while I was watching Time after time. Thanks for posting.

Brilliant news!

Thanks to Malcolm McDowell for coaxing Warner to do this. Now we'll finally have all three of the "Travis Trilogy."

Wow, two discs is a bit unexpected, I was assuming they would just rush out a single disc with nothing but commentary to appease Malcolm McDowell.

I thought it would be vanilla. Perhaps this will contain Mike Kaplan's new documentary on Anderson which played at Cannes?

This is spectacular news, I can't wait.

Exactly. OLM is getting the kind of treatment I was expecting they'd give to Performance, which I'm still not forgiving them for going all out on the extras. Not even a commentary.

Hopefully, disc two will be Jan Harlan's, O Lucky Malcolm (2006).

Too much good DVD news this week! Scary!

DVD Empire listing


IMDb lists the running time as 183 mintes - that's the original "X-rated" UK cut. The Cannes Premier ran 192 minutes. The 1995 Warner USA, NTSC VHS ran 173 minutes. The 1995 NTSC Laserdisc ran 178 minutes; the extra 5 minutes are of the "My Home Town" sequence. I don't know what the 183-minute version adds - or what was cut from the 192-minute Cannes cut. Malcolm will know.

A 30-minute behind-the-scenes was made during filming and was shown on U.S. TV before the film's release.

Surely it's not a coincidence that this is scheduled for release the exact same day as A Clockwork Orange. I'd love to see the terms of the agreement WB had with McDowell.

Malcolm on Conan O'Brian in 1993: Part 1 - Part 2

PRINCE OF THE CITY's nearly three hour runtime was split across two discs, but the set contained no extras besides the trailer and a half-hour featurette. Given O LUCKY MAN!'s similarly epic length, there's no reason to assume that two discs means WHV has rolled out the red carpet.

For the squinting impaired:


I'm sure it was a contractual thing to get the rights to the documentary, but how bizarre is it that Katia de Vidas, who apparently hasn't done much of anything but shoot and edit this doc gets credit on the features block? I'm sure people will say, "Oooh, edited by Katia de Vidas! That must be good."

A little Googling turns up this page which mentions a documentery made by De Vidas called Stanley Kubrick: The Exhibition about that touring exhibition of props & such from the estate. Maybe it will turn up somewhere in the new Kubrick set.

Looks terrific, although I would have liked to have gotten the Anderson doc mentioned above as opposed to the McDowell one - although I'm interested to hear what McDowell has to say about some of the crap he's been in over the last 25 years.

Just what I wished for! O, what lucky men we are!

What a horrible, horrible cover, though I appreciate the release to discover this McDowell-Anderson classic along with If...

Perhaps she's a Harlan "protege."

Why horrible? It's based on the original poster. What's there to dislike about McDowell's grin?

As for the film, I think O Lucky Man! is probably the best (certainly most innovative) British film of the 70s (not that there's a great deal of competition), although I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the musical interludes. I know they're supposed to be Brechtian, but that 'light rock' style has dated less well than the rest of it.

I'm a big fan of O Lucky Man! too, and it's probably my favourite Anderson, but don't write off British filmmaking of the time. The Bill Douglas Trilogy is one of the great achievements in British film of any era, and this is also the period when Terence Davies and Alan Clarke arrived and Greenaway did his best work. It's just that the best and most innovative filmmaking was on the independent margins (Douglas, Davies, Greenaway, Overlord) or on television (Clarke, Leigh, Loach, Blue Remembered Hills).

Yes, that is based on the original one-sheet. I certainly don't think it's horrible, and even kind of like the charming goofiness, but I would have preferred the 70s vibe of this alternate art.

All good points, but I was thinking in terms of feature films. I recently saw the Douglas trilogy actually, and agree that considered as a trilogy, it is possibly a greater stylistic achievement than even O Lucky Man!, but none of its individual parts, apart from the last, are really feature length. Ditto Greenaway's medium-length shorts (which are still too long to be eligible for your List Project, by the way); Davies's 'arrival' consists of one short, which in my opinion seems amateurish next to the first part of Douglas's trilogy.

The question of length would be irrelevant (the 70s were clearly a great time for short film) if it weren't indicative of the lack of funding/resources which has dogged innovative British filmmaking for the last half a century.

I don't think I'd classify the Alan Price songs as "light rock". They are a good, not great, set of songs.

O LUCKY MALCOLM! is also on the Clockwork Orange SE, isn't it?

Yes. It is featured as a supplement on both films.

I am not a fan of the songs either, but "Poor People" has played in my head at least once a day for the past 15 years. It's an awful song too.