Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
-
Flike
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:47 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I really, really enjoyed Che (crosses fingers). Contemporary releases like this I can get behind, just wish the year didn't seem so packed with them.
-
Cameron
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:01 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Yeah, the motorcycle diaries is pretty terrible. I love Soderbergh's Che, but even that film's detractors have to admit that it's more artistically viable than the fucking motorcycle diaries.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I'm not sure what he may be referring to, but it basically means some ones mother is a whore.LQ wrote:For those of us (namely myself) who don't speak Spanish and used an online translator for this...please briefly explain!Chinga la puta madre
Also since Criterion tends to group releases together does this mean we'll get Gray's anatomy when they release this?
- LQ
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Yes, the online translator helped me sort out the mother-whore-business; I was interested in what swo was referring to.
-
ianungstad
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:20 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
IFC just recently terminated their agreement with Genius products right? i believe they already have signed with another distributor but I suppose key titles could have been licensed to Criterion. Great news on Che! Now if only the deal includes My Winnipeg, The Boss of it All, Antichrist, etc.
Good possibilities here.
Good possibilities here.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Well yeah, literally, it means words I would never dare utter in the company of a woman. But figuratively, it means, um, I'm excited.LQ wrote:Yes, the online translator helped me sort out the mother-whore-business; I was interested in what swo was referring to.
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I'm guessing its "pinCHE Huevos"
- LQ
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Thanks for the explanation, my Spanish vocabulary just doubled in size. Didn't mean to stray too far OT!swo17 wrote:Well yeah, literally, it means words I would never dare utter in the company of a woman. But figuratively, it means, um, I'm excited.LQ wrote:Yes, the online translator helped me sort out the mother-whore-business; I was interested in what swo was referring to.
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I hadn't heard about this. Also great news if they can work out a licensing deal with Criterion.ianungstad wrote:IFC just recently terminated their agreement with Genius products right? i believe they already have signed with another distributor but I suppose key titles could have been licensed to Criterion. Great news on Che! Now if only the deal includes My Winnipeg, The Boss of it All, Antichrist, etc.
Good possibilities here.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
They've signed a new agreement with MPI. If the clue is Che, it's probably a one off, rather than something that will develop into a trend.ianungstad wrote:IFC just recently terminated their agreement with Genius products right? i believe they already have signed with another distributor but I suppose key titles could have been licensed to Criterion. Great news on Che! Now if only the deal includes My Winnipeg, The Boss of it All, Antichrist, etc.
Good possibilities here.
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Someone please explain this relationship between IFC and Criterion. As far as i know, there is no relationship.
Second, Joe Swanberg is a hack, and is one more sign of Criterion's downward track.
Second, Joe Swanberg is a hack, and is one more sign of Criterion's downward track.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Hasn't IFC only licensed "Solo Con Tu Pareja"?justeleblanc wrote:Someone please explain this relationship between IFC and Criterion. As far as i know, there is no relationship.
Second, Joe Swanberg is a hack, and is one more sign of Criterion's downward track.
I haven't seen this, but I have low expectations. Everything he's directed after Traffic stunk pretty bad.
Also, I haven't seen the newsletter, but please don't tell me Joe Swanberg is this month's top ten pick...
Now with more Criterion foray into contemporary cinema, who wants to bet that The Brother Bloom will get a Criterion release? I just have a gut feeling. It would be a real shame considering how awful it was.
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Could it also be Polanski's CHE?
-
jmj713
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:47 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Please let it be Soderbergh's Che! Criterion is the only company that would (very likely) release a mult-disc set containing, apart from numerous extras, both the two films as separate entities and as a complete film. I can see it being a four-discer.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
That might be a bit of a stretch (the two separate versions) though not impossible I suppose. I'm just hoping we get this thing on Blu-ray.
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I would imagine to save costs that they'd present it the way Soderbergh intended, as one complete film. Weren't the parts separated in the first place merely because of marketing concerns?
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I'll be honest: I don't know who he is.justeleblanc wrote:Second, Joe Swanberg is a hack, and is one more sign of Criterion's downward track.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
He's your typical trust-fund kid/douche who went to film school. He even admits to not having seen many films in the Criterion Collection, and it shows in his choices. They're all pretty much fall backs for entry level cineastes.cdnchris wrote:I'll be honest: I don't know who he is.justeleblanc wrote:Second, Joe Swanberg is a hack, and is one more sign of Criterion's downward track.
Last edited by The Elegant Dandy Fop on Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mteller
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:23 pm
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Clearly this is CHElsea Girls.
Or possibly a double release of The Young Girls of RoCHEfort and The Umbrellas of CHErbourg.
Or possibly a double release of The Young Girls of RoCHEfort and The Umbrellas of CHErbourg.
-
jmj713
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:47 am
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
The reason for two separate films as well as a single film is that, to my understanding (since I haven't seen the films), the two films use different aspect ratios. It would be weird. Separate and combined is the way to go!
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
Does anyone have an idea if that supposed "contentious" Q&A from the New York premiere was recorded?
- kaujot
- Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I can't comment on his douche-ness, but what's wrong with his choices? I love every release he picked, with the exception of The Harder They Come, as I haven't seen it. I guess I just don't understand how Brakhage is a fall back. Or Pialat. Or Fishing with John. Nevermind that much of the collection could be described as "for entry level cineastes."The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:He's your typical trust-fund kid/douche who went to film school. He even admits to not having seen many films in the Criterion Collection, and it shows in his choices. They're all pretty much fall backs for entry level cineastes.
Regardless, it would cost them a lot more to produce (to secure the rights, etc.) and the release would be priced accordingly.jmj713 wrote:The reason for two separate films as well as a single film is that, to my understanding (since I haven't seen the films), the two films use different aspect ratios. It would be weird. Separate and combined is the way to go!
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
I might be little hard on the guy because his movies suck. But yeah, his movies suck.kaujot wrote:I can't comment on his douche-ness, but what's wrong with his choices? I love every release he picked, with the exception of The Harder They Come, as I haven't seen it. I guess I just don't understand how Brakhage is a fall back. Or Pialat. Or Fishing with John. Nevermind that much of the collection could be described as "for entry level cineastes."The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:He's your typical trust-fund kid/douche who went to film school. He even admits to not having seen many films in the Criterion Collection, and it shows in his choices. They're all pretty much fall backs for entry level cineastes.
And don't get me wrong, I love some of those films too, but those are all typical film school viewing. Then again, a lot of the collection is.
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
This was actually the first film that went through my head and was more than puzzled, though I guess having Palance as Castro is sorta neat. I'm embarrassed to say I wasn't aware of a Polanski Che film. EDIT: I just understood what Polanski "Che?" film that was referred to before in a previous post.Jun-Dai wrote:Or maybe it's the Omar Sharif film
Once I got my act together I figured it was probably the Soderbergh film and, though I haven't seen it (waiting for video), it makes more sense and could potentially be a nice release.
I didn't think of it originally until going back through the thread but I do hope it's not The Motorcycle Diaries.
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)
My hunch is Motorcycle Diaries since it's a Focus title. I haven't seen it so I don't know if it's any good.
I did however see CHE, and that film is pretty weak, even for Soderbergh's standards. In fact, this whole business model of Criterions, which is releasing films onto DVD that already have decent DVD editions, or that will already have decent DVD editions is a complete farce.
If only Tamara still worked there. Good times.
I did however see CHE, and that film is pretty weak, even for Soderbergh's standards. In fact, this whole business model of Criterions, which is releasing films onto DVD that already have decent DVD editions, or that will already have decent DVD editions is a complete farce.
If only Tamara still worked there. Good times.