Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:19 pm
Thank you both for your comments. A Decade it is, then.
Any word on a theatrical or DVD release?Martha wrote:Darwin's Nightmare
I haven't seen Decade Under The Influence yet myself, so I cannot compare, but I would add that the UK DVD (the only one which I am familiar with) of Easy Riders has another two hours or so of interviews as extras which does get more into the gossip side of things. This extra footage also includes an interview with Peter Biskind talking about the reaction he got from the book.Oedipax wrote:Easy Riders the documentary didn't have one tenth of the gossip of the book, which I thought was always one of the book's biggest draws. It feels more like a warmed-over Decade Under, but suffering greatly from being compressed into such a short length. It's worth a rental, but Decade is the keeper.
As for problems with both documentaries, I think they do err on the side of hagiography sometimes - nostalgia for the golden era the 70s represent for many cinephiles. One does get the impression that great cinema died at the end of the 70s, which we all know isn't the case.
Still waiting for an answer...Annie Mall wrote:BTW, can anyone point me to the best documentary on DVD on Andy Warhol?
Also, the new thread that i split out is here.guest wrote:I know this question was asked months ago, but I saw the film at Hot Docs and posted my review here. I thought it was ok, but it didn't ignite any moral outrage, at least with me.ape wrote:And... has anyone seen A Decent Factory? I'm hoping it gets a DVD release sometime soon...
Having worked with many closeted politicians of both parties, there's very little to gain from this, especially since not every closeted politician opposes gay rights. Forget that both Democrats and Republicans are unable to speak honestly about the issue without fear of losing an election (just watch the Biden/Palin debate to see a more recent event), outing politicians as hypocrites grossly simplifies the issue -- I would say even more obnoxiously than Michael Moore -- and stems from common political rhetoric where hypocrisy is only used against politicians selectively (when convenient to your argument, no doubt). Outing anyone who doesn't wish to be outed is repugnant, and I commend those, who -- when given the chance during an election to 'out' politicians -- keep the secret to themselves, even if it means losing the election.Antoine Doinel wrote:Kirby Dick, the director of This Film Is Not Yet Rated, is currently in post-production on his next film, Outraged. The film apparently outs - or at least accuses - several closeted, Republican politicians of leading double lives. I hate hypocritical Republican assholes as much as the next person, but Dick's tactics will not only hurt those politicians but more importantly, the immediate family members etc. Just wondering what some of the LGB members of the board feel about this.
Pretty much my stance. Outing someone is definitely the wrong way to go about things, especially when, as it seems here, he's targeting people only based on their political party rather then genuine hypocrisy.justeleblanc wrote:Having worked with many closeted politicians of both parties, there's very little to gain from this, especially since not every closeted politician opposes gay rights. Forget that both Democrats and Republicans are unable to speak honestly about the issue without fear of losing an election (just watch the Biden/Palin debate to see a more recent event), outing politicians as hypocrites grossly simplifies the issue -- I would say even more obnoxiously than Michael Moore -- and stems from common political rhetoric where hypocrisy is only used against politicians selectively (when convenient to your argument, no doubt). Outing anyone who doesn't wish to be outed is repugnant, and I commend those, who -- when given the chance during an election to 'out' politicians -- keep the secret to themselves, even if it means losing the election.Antoine Doinel wrote:Kirby Dick, the director of This Film Is Not Yet Rated, is currently in post-production on his next film, Outraged. The film apparently outs - or at least accuses - several closeted, Republican politicians of leading double lives. I hate hypocritical Republican assholes as much as the next person, but Dick's tactics will not only hurt those politicians but more importantly, the immediate family members etc. Just wondering what some of the LGB members of the board feel about this.
But then this Kirby Dick. His previous film was glib and blinded by a misinformed political agenda, should we really pretend his injections to the conversation are anything other than farts and belches?