Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Message
Author
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8001 Post by hearthesilence »

FWIW, re: Sandler upthread, on last year's Film Comment roundtable discussion for the NYFF - with Clinton Krute, Molly Haskell, J. Hoberman and Beatrice Loayza - the consensus was that Sandler was much more interesting than George Clooney, though given what they discussed, that argument was based on more ambitious fare by Baumbach, the Safdie brothers, Paul Thomas Anderson, etc. and tbf, if you exclude all the broad shit that made Sandler famous, he has a pretty damn impressive filmography.
User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 8:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8002 Post by hearthesilence »

Re: David Lynch, I get people's frustration, but I also get that Criterion has to do what they can to stay profitable (especially when they've had tough stretches in what's widely understood as a volatile and uncertain business). I'm not sure if a David Lynch box set is actually considered an easy moneymaker - I would assume so, but I also have no idea how many copies they sell of any title so it's not exactly an educated guess. But if it is indeed an easy moneymaker, that's much more preferable than, say, adding more Michael Bay films to the collection.

I should add, this is why I generally skip their enormous, comprehensive box sets. Aside from The Straight Story, the most enticing thing that I don't have may be Lynch's short films, but that's it.
ftsoh
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:59 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8003 Post by ftsoh »

Damn! How dare Criterion release something I am not interested in! /s
User avatar
Hogfather
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:20 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8004 Post by Hogfather »

How do we know this isn't just going to be a re-issue of DYNAMIC:01? We already know that Janus has the rights to it.
James Stock
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2026 2:55 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8005 Post by James Stock »

I'm wondering if the set would come with Dune or not.
User avatar
Mr.DarjeelingLimited
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 6:58 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8006 Post by Mr.DarjeelingLimited »

A Reddit user reached out to Criterion and got a response of confirmation that standalone titles will follow the Kubrick set.
James Stock
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2026 2:55 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8007 Post by James Stock »

Mr.DarjeelingLimited wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2026 5:48 pm A Reddit user reached out to Criterion and got a response of confirmation that standalone titles will follow the Kubrick set.
The email only said some would get standalones.
User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8008 Post by Matt »

Since the box includes films from multiple studios, I'm sure it's like an Essential Fellini situation where La Dolce Vita was not made available separately, even though they released it before. I'm sure Universal is not going to let them release Spartacus on its own despite their previous DVD release. I'd expect maybe just Lolita and possibly an upgrade of Dr. Strangelove.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7

#8009 Post by MichaelB »

ftsoh wrote:Damn! How dare Criterion release something I am not interested in! /s
I’ve never understood why people don’t just tune these things out; there’s always plenty of other stuff coming out.

I doubt many people here are aficionados of the BFI’s British Transport Films compilations, but there are good reasons why they now run to something like sixteen two-disc volumes! Basically, there are at least as many (if not considerably more) trainspotters than hardcore cinephiles out there, and the BTF films (one of the best investments the BFI ever made) have effectively underwritten loads of stuff that gets celebrated here.

See also the British sitcom The Brittas Empire and the early days of MoC. And indeed the current set-up, where MoC’s activities are substantially underwritten by martial arts films. Although that’s just reminded me of the delicious irony of someone here ranting and raving at some length about how it was a waste of time for Eureka to put out F for Fake because Criterion had already, only for it to become one of MoC’s bestsellers.
Post Reply