MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

News on Eureka and Masters of Cinema
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
der_Artur
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:22 pm
Location: stuttgart

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#601 Post by der_Artur »

domino harvey wrote:Beautiful, but doesn't really capture the film. If I'd never seen it though, I'd pick that up off the shelf in a heartbeat
It seems like many of us who have never seen the movie think that way. #1 makes me very curious and I would be confused, only if that woman plays no important role at all.
User avatar
HelenLawson
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#602 Post by HelenLawson »

Having never seen this film, I'm more intrigued by Criterion's unsettling cover image than any of these. However, only #3 makes sense to me for a film entitled "To Our Romance".
User avatar
FerdinandGriffon
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:16 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#603 Post by FerdinandGriffon »

HelenLawson wrote:However, only #3 makes sense to me for a film entitled "To Our Romance".
It'll make less sense when you watch the film and realize that that's a father and his daughter on the cover.
User avatar
Hopscotch
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:30 am

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#604 Post by Hopscotch »

der_Artur wrote:
domino harvey wrote:Beautiful, but doesn't really capture the film. If I'd never seen it though, I'd pick that up off the shelf in a heartbeat
It seems like many of us who have never seen the movie think that way. #1 makes me very curious and I would be confused, only if that woman plays no important role at all.
She's very much the star, so no worries.
User avatar
HelenLawson
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#605 Post by HelenLawson »

FerdinandGriffon wrote:
HelenLawson wrote:However, only #3 makes sense to me for a film entitled "To Our Romance".
It'll make less sense when you watch the film and realize that that's a father and his daughter on the cover.
Hot!
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#606 Post by jbeall »

Hot, but jailbait. But regardless, the "romance" between the father and daughter is an important part of the film.

BTW, a question about the title's translation: "nos amours" is plural--I always translated it as "to our love[d one]s". Could someone who's more fluent in French say something more about the phrase's connotations and whether or not this is the best translation of the title?
User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#607 Post by tenia »

jbeall wrote:Hot, but jailbait. But regardless, the "romance" between the father and daughter is an important part of the film.

BTW, a question about the title's translation: "nos amours" is plural--I always translated it as "to our love[d one]s". Could someone who's more fluent in French say something more about the phrase's connotations and whether or not this is the best translation of the title?
It depends if 'loves' refers to the lovers or the relationships. To our love(d one)s would refer to the lovers directly while To our romance(s) would refer to the relationships themselves, the feelings.

As the title is more like a toast-liner, I think that To our romance is better than To our love(s) or To our loved one(s), but anyway, the best/closest translation would have been To our romances.
rwaits
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:24 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#608 Post by rwaits »

Absolutely #1. No comparison.
User avatar
TheGodfather
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#609 Post by TheGodfather »

My favorite is the 1st one, then the 2nd one, wich is gorgeous as well.
User avatar
GringoTex
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:57 am

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#610 Post by GringoTex »

#1, and it's very fitting for the film. It's the image Pialat begins with, offering an ideal existence, which he then proceeds to slowly strip away.
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#611 Post by James »

GringoTex wrote:#1, and it's very fitting for the film. It's the image Pialat begins with, offering an ideal existence, which he then proceeds to slowly strip away.
I would agree with number one too, and I also think it is fitting for the movie, but mostly for the reasons HerrShreck lists as well as for the fact that it is one of the first images in the movie: so while for us, we don't see much of Suzanne's rebellious nature beforehand, we only assume it's an ideal existence, but I'd disagree with you and say that I think that it is also safe to say that it probably never really was an ideal existence and the movie begins with the beginning of Suzanne's rebellions (this being my reasoning for #1 as the best cover) as a result of more of her being mistreated within her family circle that we never see before where the movie begins, but would see plenty of as the movie progresses.
User avatar
Cabiria21
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:10 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#612 Post by Cabiria21 »

#1 by far
User avatar
RodneyOz
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:54 am

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#613 Post by RodneyOz »

From the MoC twitter account:

http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/MABUSE_BO ... dpi_3D.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks good to me :D
User avatar
sidehacker
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 6:49 am
Location: Bowling Green, Ohio
Contact:

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#614 Post by sidehacker »

I'm already way too excited for this. If there's anything wrong with the cover it's that it creates the sense that its "The Complete Fritz Lang" but yeah, it still looks wonderful.
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#615 Post by Finch »

Beautiful artwork - possibly the year's best. =D>
User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#616 Post by jbeall »

OMFG! Fantastic artwork!!!!
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#617 Post by domino harvey »

Yarrgh, that will replace the whale in my nightmares
ehimle
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:35 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#618 Post by ehimle »

that mabuse cover is gorgeous!!!!!
I need that set!
User avatar
L.A.
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:33 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#619 Post by L.A. »

That Mabuse box set looks just fantastic!
User avatar
TheGodfather
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#620 Post by TheGodfather »

RodneyOz wrote:From the MoC twitter account:

http://eurekavideo.co.uk/nick/MABUSE_BO ... dpi_3D.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks good to me :D
:shock: =D> just: wow!
User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: United States

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#621 Post by Finch »

And we haven't even seen the artwork for the films yet. I wonder how many people who own any or all of the three films already are going to give in and double-dip on the strength of the box cover alone?
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

Re: Phantom

#622 Post by skuhn8 »

didn't see this anywhere else:
Artwork for Phantom (#84) and Die Finanzen des GroBherzogs (#85) are up on the MOC Catalogue page. So I take it this will be a double disc package a la Mizoguchi. Very exciting.
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#623 Post by James »

Is it safe to assume that the cover for Under the Sun of Satan will look something like this?
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: 84 Phantom

#624 Post by James »

The artwork for Phantom has changed; pages are up without screens.
James
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: MoC Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on

#625 Post by James »

I don't know if it's open for suggestion or a done deal, but I personally prefer the previous Phantom cover.
Post Reply