I don’t like the film either, but I’ve always found it to be repelling by design, deliberately depriving us of any cinematic flairs of catharsis beyond that emptiness you describe, due to the stark portrait of alcoholism. The choices that contribute to making it feel “emptier and emptier” emulate the slip into complete submission, so I consider it to be an objectively great film at unflinchingly tackling the hopeless side of addiction via narrative form, but I probably like it less than anyone I’ve met- partly because it’s not an enjoyable film and partly because I rarely have an interest in films on addiction that are whittled down to one-way tickets to hell.hearthesilence wrote: ↑Sat Jul 18, 2020 11:37 amUnder the Volcano was massively disappointing because it had the makings of a great performance from Albert Finney, potentially his best, but as the film went on, it too felt emptier and emptier.
In my early days on this forum, I wrote up a long piece on Wise Blood after finally reading the novel and revisiting the film, but lost it (or self-consciously deleted it, either are possible). Unfortunately I’d need to reread the book to adequately describe why I think the film adaptation is so strong, but even its detractors should check out Flannery O’Connor’s book. It’s better, and has a lot more subtext unable to come through in the film, yet this information greatly helps appreciate the adaptation. If I remember correctly, even though a ton of stuff is omitted but the film, it’s still a meticulously faithful adaptation to everything except the missing pieces- and the awareness of those elements reveal blind spots on the finished Huston work.