897 Barry Lyndon

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Message
Author
User avatar
Walter Kurtz
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2020 3:03 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#101 Post by Walter Kurtz » Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:19 pm

therewillbeblus wrote:
Mon Jun 07, 2021 1:51 pm
... the psychology of a person who thinks they matter when they really don't... this is one of the best films ever made about egocentricity's irrelevance... the final scene with the wife writing letters is tragic in an aloof way- signifying the monotonous acts of meaningless gestures we are trapped in. Kubrick seems to be pitying these people from a distance before closing the curtains as a passive reminder that there is no interventionist God to warrant that pity, outside of our own relationship to the recurring banality of living with insignificance in a reciprocally faithless social context.
Kubrick effectively encapsulates this meaninglessness in the way he pulls back in his zooms from the tight shots to world-at-large that is evolving in seven billion directions. And you nicely suggest my final "way". The way Mrs. Lyndon hesitates for a moment ('pulls her pen back') and a life metaphorically disappears when the hesitation is over.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#102 Post by therewillbeblus » Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:32 pm

Well said, Walter Kurtz. Totally agree on the formalist technique lending itself to this relentless right-sizeness of the action and characters. Kubrick has always been on this wavelength but I think this is his best film that captures that proposed ethos. I recall reading a review of some Coen Brothers movie (I think A Serious Man) where the critic referred to the Coens as "Kubrick's children" and they do share this kind of philosophical worldview, in a micro-macro juggling approach with acidic bite about the Joke of Life. Whether one interprets these artists as laughing 'at' or 'with' or somewhere in between is where I think some people become repelled or attracted.

User avatar
TheKieslowskiHaze
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:37 am

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#103 Post by TheKieslowskiHaze » Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:28 pm

I agree with all that's been said. I'll add that Barry Lyndon is, for me, the subtlest and most interesting expression of one of Kubrick's pet themes: the tension between a rule-based society and the uncontainable ids of people within that society. It depicts a rigid world of rituals and manners that is constantly (and hilariously) undercut by characters' instinctive desires to fuck and kill each other. This is reinforced visually by cinematography that is usually formally impressive and precise (order) but is sometimes punctuated by handheld immediacy (disorder).

It might be my favorite Kubrick, though 2001 also has a solid claim to that title.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#104 Post by therewillbeblus » Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:39 pm

TheKieslowskiHaze wrote:
Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:28 pm
This is reinforced visually by cinematography that is usually formally impressive and precise (order) but is sometimes punctuated by handheld immediacy (disorder).
I can't think of any moments in the film (other than perhaps during the early battles?) that commit to the latter aside from when O'Neal attacks his step-son, unable to sustain his ego functions with will power, a primal explosion that self-sabotages his life from there on out. I'm not sure the film needs any other scene quite like this, because it's so incongruous with the rest of the formalist style that we jarringly comprehend this point off of one take. The first time I saw Barry Lyndon I didn't like it (now, like you, it's vying for a top spot) but I recall exactly where I was and how I felt when that scene erupted and urgently ousted me from my apathy.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#105 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:53 pm

Lady Lyndon's suicide attempt is also shot handheld, and the boxing match during Barry's military service.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#106 Post by therewillbeblus » Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:28 pm

Ah right, the boxing match was what I was thinking of- The suicide attempt is a fitting example that I'm struggling to recollect, which is as good an excuse as any to revisit this promptly

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#107 Post by therewillbeblus » Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:26 pm

I also like Pauline Kael's blunt reading of "people are disgusting but things are lovely"
Pauline Kael wrote:Thackeray wrote a skittish, fast-moving parody of romantic, sentimental writing. It was about the adventures of an Irish knave who used British hypocrisy for leverage. However, it must have been Barry Lyndon's ruthless pursuit of wealth and social position rather than his spirit that attracted Stanley Kubrick. His images are fastidiously delicate in the inexpressive, peculiarly chilly manner of the English painters of the period-the mid-18th century—and it's an ice-pack of a movie, a masterpiece in every insignificant detail. Kubrick suppresses most of the active elements that make movies pleasurable. The film says that people are disgusting but things are lovely. And a narrator (Sir Michael Hordern) tells you what's going to happen before you see it. It's a coffee-table movie; the stately tour of European high life is like a three-hour slide show for art-history majors.
Revisiting it tonight, the film plays more and more like a comedy every time, albeit an unsettlingly tragic one in its cool tone that strips our world of its meaning. Even when Barry wins the army brawl or fencing match (his only honest 'wins' in the film), the celebrations are neutered and we return to puritanical ceremonies whereby Barry is but a speck in the expansive shot

Marwood
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:05 am

Re: Barry Lyndon (Stanley Kubrick, 1975)

#108 Post by Marwood » Tue Jun 08, 2021 6:07 am

Sloper wrote:
Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:07 am
The BFI have produced four very interesting but annoyingly uncredited video essays
The videos are voiced by the always charming and authoritative Neil Brand.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#109 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Tue Aug 02, 2022 4:47 pm

Was the voice-over part of the shooting script, or was it devised in post-production?

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#110 Post by Roger Ryan » Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:22 am

flyonthewall2983 wrote:
Tue Aug 02, 2022 4:47 pm
Was the voice-over part of the shooting script, or was it devised in post-production?
Kubrick’s initial script used first person narration from Barry himself (as in the Thackeray novel). The script page samples excerpted in that big Taschen book on the director show that the narration hewed very close to what is heard in the final film with “I” replaced by “Barry” or “he”, but with the general tone and intent remaining more-or-less the same. If anything, much of the narration in the original script was trimmed way down.

flyonthewall2983
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#111 Post by flyonthewall2983 » Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:37 pm

I was talking about this with someone on Letterboxd yesterday. He praised it as a comedy and I countered that it is all in the voiceover, that nothing on screen is funny without it. For far so many personal reasons that third act tension between Barry and his wife’s son was emotionally excruciating on an emotional level, something I could probably draw from every Kubrick I have seen, except Strangelove.

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#112 Post by Roger Ryan » Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:52 pm

I would agree that most of the humor, or satire, comes from the juxtaposition of that matter-of-fact narration with the images it accompanies. However, moments like Sir Charles Lyndon’s seizure or Leonard Rossiter’s entire performance always makes me laugh out loud. I consider all of Kubrick’s films post-Spartacus to be satires; it’s just that some are drier than others. Lyndon is unique in that the second half has the most sustained emotional intensity of any of the director’s films, apart from Paths of Glory perhaps.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#113 Post by therewillbeblus » Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:18 pm

The voiceover helps, but the entire juxtaposition that that Kubrick draws between Barry's insignificance and his perceived significance- as well as his function as the central principal in a vast narrative- goes far beyond that surface-level narration. The film is a deliciously sick joke pointed at many specific characteristics and patterns in social dynamics, but more broadly it's targeting how unimportant we are and how the world doesn't give a shit about our expectations (Barry's fear-based borderline empathic/selfish gesture to not fire at the end doesn't wind up reciprocally serving himself as he anticipated, subverting his expectations about cultural etiquette or what he deserves from a Higher Power!) It's the Comedy of Life, and maybe exhibit A on why a local critic once declared the Coen bros "Kubrick's children"

User avatar
Quote Perf Unquote
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2022 2:57 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#114 Post by Quote Perf Unquote » Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:10 pm

There's not a single post-Spartacus Kubrick film that isn't completely hilarious, whatever other dramatic qualities they possess. Lotta people tend to overlook his sly humor or can't accept the coexistence humor and drama, which no one does as well as K.

yoshimori
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:03 am
Location: LA CA

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#115 Post by yoshimori » Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:22 pm

"I love the use of the color blue by the artist."

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#116 Post by yoloswegmaster » Mon Oct 16, 2023 3:22 pm

Interesting comment I found on a Reddit thread about Scorsese's latest film:
I saw Fran Leibowitz last weekend. She said this is the best movie “Marty” has made and possibly the best movie ever. Debatable ofc but it’s what she said.

She also told a story about watching Barry Lyndon together. Scorsese invites a select few friends, colleagues and film buffs to watch a movie and drink champagne on New Year’s Eve every year. She wasn’t excited to watch this but did anyway. Someone there said they were watching Kubrick’s negative and she didn’t know what that meant and they explained that it’s the original film that was in his camera. She loved the movie in the end but my jaw dropped… can you imagine? Cool to know that it’s in great possession with Scorsese.
BRB, just gonna become a one of the greatest director's of all time just so I can have the clout to watch classic films directly from the original camera negatives.

nicolas
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 11:34 am

897 Barry Lyndon

#117 Post by nicolas » Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:06 pm

yoloswegmaster wrote:Interesting comment I found on a Reddit thread about Scorsese's latest film:
I saw Fran Leibowitz last weekend. She said this is the best movie “Marty” has made and possibly the best movie ever. Debatable ofc but it’s what she said.

She also told a story about watching Barry Lyndon together. Scorsese invites a select few friends, colleagues and film buffs to watch a movie and drink champagne on New Year’s Eve every year. She wasn’t excited to watch this but did anyway. Someone there said they were watching Kubrick’s negative and she didn’t know what that meant and they explained that it’s the original film that was in his camera. She loved the movie in the end but my jaw dropped… can you imagine? Cool to know that it’s in great possession with Scorsese.
BRB, just gonna become a one of the greatest director's of all time just so I can have the clout to watch classic films directly from the original camera negatives.
I don’t think she’s right there. The OCN surely is in Warner’s possession and stored in their vaults. I remember a picture of the late Leon Vitali when he was inside there and the Kubrick negatives were shown stored around him. I can’t imagine they let them out of sight especially as Dr. Strangelove’s negative has been thrown away in the 60s I believe.
For comparison, the 4K Godfather restoration was unprecedented due to the pandemic as the technicians had to take the negative reels home by car or to other facilities for scanning, inspecting etc. I’m not sure whether insurance agencies had the slightest ideas about that.

What’s more likely is that Scorsese has a 35mm (positive) print struck from the negative.

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#118 Post by yoloswegmaster » Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:07 pm

Either that or they were playing Kubrick's personal print.

nicolas
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2023 11:34 am

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#119 Post by nicolas » Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:13 pm

yoloswegmaster wrote:Either that or they were playing Kubrick's personal print.
Good point!

User avatar
Tuppence
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:52 am

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#120 Post by Tuppence » Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:14 pm

Leibowitz is mistaken, or someone was having a joke on her. You cannot project a negative. Aside from anything else, there is no soundtrack on a camera negative. An answer print from the negative, perhaps Warner's own reference copy, seems the likeliest option.

User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#121 Post by EddieLarkin » Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:23 pm

Or they were just watching the Blu-ray (or more likely Kaleidescape, which Scorsese is known to use) which is certainly more like "watching the negative" than a print would be... (i.e. she misunderstood that the transfer was directly FROM the negative).

User avatar
Peacock
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:47 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#122 Post by Peacock » Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:00 pm

I was there, and I’m fairly certain it was a VHS he was showing.

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#123 Post by therewillbeblus » Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:07 pm

“Marty” is also my BFF and I can attest he’s got the good negs

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#124 Post by hearthesilence » Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:59 pm

Tuppence wrote:
Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:14 pm
Leibowitz is mistaken, or someone was having a joke on her. You cannot project a negative. Aside from anything else, there is no soundtrack on a camera negative. An answer print from the negative, perhaps Warner's own reference copy, seems the likeliest option.
That would be hilarious if she added, "Why are the colors fucked up and why is this silent?" to which Marty replied "it's the original camera negative!"

beamish14
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 3:07 pm

Re: 897 Barry Lyndon

#125 Post by beamish14 » Tue Oct 17, 2023 12:48 am

hearthesilence wrote:
Mon Oct 16, 2023 8:59 pm
Tuppence wrote:
Mon Oct 16, 2023 5:14 pm
Leibowitz is mistaken, or someone was having a joke on her. You cannot project a negative. Aside from anything else, there is no soundtrack on a camera negative. An answer print from the negative, perhaps Warner's own reference copy, seems the likeliest option.
That would be hilarious if she added, "Why are the colors fucked up and why is this silent?" to which Marty replied "it's the original camera negative!"

I remember reading a profile of Steven Spielberg in a major magazine which mentioned that he was inspired to join the nascent Film Foundation after watching “the original negative of Jaws in 1989,” which shocked me, too. Aren’t there any fact checkers who are well-versed in film?

Post Reply