Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Moderator: MichaelB
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Not willing to be the devil's advocate, but from the customer side of things, some video releases seem to be done without communicating anything to the cast, producers or directors about the project, which they basically discover them once released or announced (like, very recently, Brick). This creates a lack of visibility between what is true oversight for the home video releases and what is just a logistic or personal result (they weren't available, they didn't want to participate).
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
That's unlikely to apply to the Jarman project, given the number of people that they did track down.
- tenia
- Ask Me About My Bassoon
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
I'm quite certain of that, but I'm also quite certain that many consumers don't track this kind of things and simply reverts on their generic biased impressions (which, in here, would be "labels don't bother").
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
See also that idiot who posted a one-star "review" of volume 2 on Amazon (since deleted, hopefully out of embarrassment) because it didn't have Edward II.
Although the classic in that department was the guy who reviewed an extra (as in a critical comment, not merely a description) that didn't actually exist! It had been announced, but had to be cancelled at the last minute because of the very elderly interviewee's unexpectedly poor health - but this guy was clearly going from the original announcement rather than the final specs and thought "I can't be bothered to actually watch the extras: I'll just go through this list and add a non-committal comment to each one".
Although the classic in that department was the guy who reviewed an extra (as in a critical comment, not merely a description) that didn't actually exist! It had been announced, but had to be cancelled at the last minute because of the very elderly interviewee's unexpectedly poor health - but this guy was clearly going from the original announcement rather than the final specs and thought "I can't be bothered to actually watch the extras: I'll just go through this list and add a non-committal comment to each one".
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
I finally went through all the short films included as bonuses on Volume 1. I have to say I far prefer Jarman in this experimental mode vs. the bulk of his narrative features. Sloan Square, Message from the Temple, and Psychic Rally in Heaven are exquisite but too fleeting. Much more of this please!
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
That’s too bad, especially with his recent passing, but that sounds totally in character with Finney’s general go-his-own-way demeanor and I’m not surprised at all. I love the story about how he not only skipped the Oscar ceremony the year Tom Jones won, but reporters had trouble finding him to get a comment after the wins (and his own loss). Eventually he was tracked to a big drunken dance party on a yacht in the tropics where he was living it up and seemed oblivious to the Oscars’ existence. Upon being told Sidney Poitier had beat him for Best Actor, Finney cheered him on, instructed the entire pleasure cruise to dance their next one “for Sidney,” and otherwise had no interest in the newsMichaelB wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 5:30 amIt's the safest imaginable bet that she was approached. But if they say no, or it's logistically impractical for other reasons, there's nothing you can do.
Powerhouse tried to get Albert Finney involved with both Gumshoe and Charlie Bubbles, but no luck: he was aware that the projects were happening and wished them both well, but made it very clear that that was all they'd get out of him.
-
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 10:18 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Interesting thing about Message From The Temple, is while he plays the spokesman for the Temple Of Psychick Youth, it’s not actually his voice. It was actually voiced by a Mr Sebastian, Psychic TV’s tattoist!swo17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:18 pmI finally went through all the short films included as bonuses on Volume 1. I have to say I far prefer Jarman in this experimental mode vs. the bulk of his narrative features. Sloan Square, Message from the Temple, and Psychic Rally in Heaven are exquisite but too fleeting. Much more of this please!
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Yes, there's a very obvious discrepancy between the audio and the movement of Jarman's mouth, which contributes to the unsettling mood
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
As far as I can tell, these are the only Jarman shorts that can be found outside of the BFI boxes (not counting any of the Pet Shop Boys or Smiths videos). Does anyone know of any others?
A Journey to Avebury (1971) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Last of England DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Garden of Luxor (1972) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Centre Pompidou DVD
The Art of Mirrors (1973) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Ashden's Walk on Møn (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Stolen Apples for Karen Blixen (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
A Journey to Avebury (1971) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Last of England DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Garden of Luxor (1972) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Centre Pompidou DVD
The Art of Mirrors (1973) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Ashden's Walk on Møn (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Stolen Apples for Karen Blixen (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
- zedz
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
I can't think of any others, but much of In the Shadow of the Sun and Glitterbug comprise Super 8 films that used to be screened under different names, of course.
To add to your frustration, several of the interviews on Volume Two reference Imagining October (1984) as a pivotal film in Jarman's development, but it doesn't appear on either set, or anywhere else, it seems.
To add to your frustration, several of the interviews on Volume Two reference Imagining October (1984) as a pivotal film in Jarman's development, but it doesn't appear on either set, or anywhere else, it seems.
- DeprongMori
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:59 am
- Location: San Francisco
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
The only one I know of is the three-song film that Jarman did for Marianne Faithfull to promote her 1979 album Broken English. Jarman’s video is included on the two-CD Deluxe re-issue of the album. I have no idea about the video quality of what’s on the CD set.
- The Fanciful Norwegian
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
- Location: Teegeeack
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
A gallery in London did an (extremely) limited issue of five DVDs at some point. I don't know the circumstances of the film's creation, but I'm wondering if this is a Matthew Barney-type situation that precludes a commercial home video release.
-
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
The reasoning behind Imagining October's limited circulation is discussed in Jim Ellis' book. I'm not sure why this is still an issue though - https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Zfc ... 22&f=false
I'm disappointed it isn't included in the BFI set too. Been wanting to see it for years. It isn't even circulating in any backchannels.
I'm disappointed it isn't included in the BFI set too. Been wanting to see it for years. It isn't even circulating in any backchannels.
- senseabove
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:07 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Oh, wow. That's an edition of five. As in there are five DVDs, period. Not a set of five DVDs issued in a limited edition.The Fanciful Norwegian wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 11:00 amA gallery in London did an (extremely) limited issue of five DVDs at some point. I don't know the circumstances of the film's creation, but I'm wondering if this is a Matthew Barney-type situation that precludes a commercial home video release.
I get a message that either that page is unavailable or I have reached my limit and can't see it, though the pages before and after it are still visible and I can see the position of the highlighted matches on the hidden page, but no text... Care to summarize?kubelkind wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 1:44 pmThe reasoning behind Imagining October's limited circulation is discussed in Jim Ellis' book. I'm not sure why this is still an issue though - https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Zfc ... 22&f=false
I'm disappointed it isn't included in the BFI set too. Been wanting to see it for years. It isn't even circulating in any backchannels.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
He filmed pages from a book that had been censored in Russia
- The Fanciful Norwegian
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
- Location: Teegeeack
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
The full passage:
I couldn't figure out why this would've had any impact on the film's distribution and exhibition until I found a related section in Tony Peake's biography of Jarman, which might also explain why the film is still out of circulation:The film originated in a trip taken in October 1984. Jarman went to Moscow with filmmakers Sally Potter and Peter Wollen at the invitation of Peter Sainsbury, to screen some of their films. According to Tony Peake, "Jarman later said that with the single exception of his first trip to America in 1964, his visit to Russia 'had more effect on me that any other journey I've made out of this country.'" He took with him ten rolls of super-8 film, and these became the foundation of Imagining October. The first referent of the title is a visit to the study of Sergei Eisenstein, one of Jarman's heroes. Jarman writes that "Among the books Peter Wollen discovered a copy of Reed's Ten Days That Shook the World, signed 'Eisenstein, Moscow 1920'. It had been crudely censored: Trotsky's name blocked out in black ink; on this Eisenstein had based the official film of the Revolution October [released in the West as Ten Days That Shook the World]. I had been filming the flat, with the consent of Mr. Kleeman, the curator; I filmed Peter turning the pages of this book, nearly all my ten reels were now exposed." If the title indicates that the film is something of a meditation on the possibilities of revolutionary art, this early moment in the film certainly limits the optimism. (Ironically, this footage led to Imagining October itself having an extremely limited circulation, and so, because of its relative unavailability, I will be describing the film in some detail.)
Since The Angelic Conversation was in line for the forthcoming Berlin Film Festival, James Mackay, who produced Imagining October for Jarman, thought it would make sense for the festival to screen the new film as well, and took it to Berlin to show the selectors. They were horrified. Even though no one had forbidden Jarman to use his camera, to film in this manner behind the Iron Curtain was, they said, utterly irresponsible; a deliberate provocation and an act which could put a great many jobs at risk: those of the people in the Union of Cinematographers, the group's guides, even Naum Kleiman. A member of the Communist Party was dispatched to view the film at Phoenix House. 'This film,' he announced, 'must never be shown.'
Jarman was so appalled to think he might harm the people who had entertained him in the USSR that, although it went against the grain to condone censorship, he readily agreed that if the film were to be widely distributed, the offending footage of Peter Wollen's finger pointing at Eisenstein's book should be cut. He accepted, too, that the slogan 'Eisenstein censored! Trotsky erased!' could be inked over, and that it was perhaps best if the film were only shown at relatively minor festivals and retrospectives, certainly as little as possible on the continent.
[...]
As long as Jarman made the suggested changes to the film, in time the BFI were prepared (even keen) to distribute it commercially. What prevented them from doing so was not fear of Soviet retribution, but the censorship of capital: the cost of clearing rights with the musicians' union for Britten's setting of 'O Rose, Thou Art Sick'.
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
But all this is 35 years in the past now; and it's hard to imagine that anyone in current Russia would be offended or even in danger because of that footage. I even think that some of the people who helped Jarman at the time may not even be alive anymore. Which probably only leaves the music rights for the Britten setting as a problem, which should be possible for the BFI to solve.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
The cost of clearing music rights is what prevented most of Jarman’s music videos from being included. And the single most expensive item in the Jan Švankmajer set was the Hugh Cornwell music video - the BFI only agreed to sanction it after I pointed out that it would legitimately allow them to include the word “complete” on the front of the box, which they thought was worth it.
So it’s an easy enough problem to solve, provided you’re happy to request that money be diverted away from other projects while explaining to your colleagues why your project is more important than theirs.
So it’s an easy enough problem to solve, provided you’re happy to request that money be diverted away from other projects while explaining to your colleagues why your project is more important than theirs.
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
I see your point, but if music rights are so expensive to get, how was it even possible to release Jarman's "War Requiem" (90 min. of Britten!), "The Angelic Conversation" or "The Last of England" on dvd?
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Presumably because the relevant rights were cleared across all media for commercial release at the time of production. Otherwise the films would have been unreleasable, and therefore unbackable.
From what I can see, Imagining October was never intended for commercial release, so the same clearances weren't made. So it's a similar situation to that which afflicts most of the BBC's twentieth-century catalogue, which is that while they're perfectly willing to license their holdings, the right to use any third-party material has to be negotiated afresh for commercial release. I suspect this is why the BFI's Ken Russell: The Great Composers set omits his films on Prokofiev and Bartók: unlike the Elgar and Debussy films, they both make extensive use of third-party footage, and of course the too-expensive Laurel & Hardy clip in the Delius film had to be changed to a similar British comedy that the BFI owned outright (something that I think worked out surprisingly well given the circumstances: the alternative was simply to hack out that entire section).
From what I can see, Imagining October was never intended for commercial release, so the same clearances weren't made. So it's a similar situation to that which afflicts most of the BBC's twentieth-century catalogue, which is that while they're perfectly willing to license their holdings, the right to use any third-party material has to be negotiated afresh for commercial release. I suspect this is why the BFI's Ken Russell: The Great Composers set omits his films on Prokofiev and Bartók: unlike the Elgar and Debussy films, they both make extensive use of third-party footage, and of course the too-expensive Laurel & Hardy clip in the Delius film had to be changed to a similar British comedy that the BFI owned outright (something that I think worked out surprisingly well given the circumstances: the alternative was simply to hack out that entire section).
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Vol. 1 does remove original music from two of the extras (Jazz Calendar and the alternate cut of Sebastiane) to avoid having to clear the rights. (The latter originally featured music by Brian Eno.)
-
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 10:18 am
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
There’s actually another video featuring Derek Jarman as spokesman for the Temple Of Psychick Youth. It’s similar to Message From The Temple, but features different dialogue and is backed by an instrumental version of Just Drifting, the opening track from Psychic TV’s album Force The Hand Of Chance. It was originally the opening of Psychic TV’s The First Transmission video. I don’t think this ever got a dvd release, but come to think of it the original video never got an official release either, due to the subject matter.swo17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:01 pmAs far as I can tell, these are the only Jarman shorts that can be found outside of the BFI boxes (not counting any of the Pet Shop Boys or Smiths videos). Does anyone know of any others?
A Journey to Avebury (1971) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Last of England DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Garden of Luxor (1972) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Centre Pompidou DVD
The Art of Mirrors (1973) - Kino Tempest BD/Second Sight Tempest DVD/Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Ashden's Walk on Møn (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
Stolen Apples for Karen Blixen (1973) - Italian Raro Super 8 DVD
-
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:26 pm
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Thank you to those who alerted to the fact that Volume 1 was OOP. I managed to get one of the last two on CEX, thankfully in mint condition.
Any Jarman I have seen was a long long time ago so I am basically coming at this as a blind buy. Is there any title that is a good place to start or should I simply go by chronology?
Any Jarman I have seen was a long long time ago so I am basically coming at this as a blind buy. Is there any title that is a good place to start or should I simply go by chronology?
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
Well the first film chronologically is my favorite film on here, but The Tempest is probably a better introduction to his more typical narrative style
-
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:26 pm
Re: Derek Jarman Volumes 1-2: 1976-1994
^ Thanks. I do love a good Shakespeare adaptation so I might start with that.