Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: The Films of 2017
Dan Gilroy's upcoming film with Denzel Washington has inexplicably been renamed, from Inner City to Roman Israel, Esq.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: The Films of 2017
Probably due in no small part to the viral pics that went around of Washington on the set.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Dan Gilroy's new legal thriller, starring Denzel Washington, will premiere at TIFF and release this year. Sony is positioning it as a major Oscar contender, and it seems to have been completed at an almost Eastwood speed.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Same can be said for Ridley Scott's next, which Sony is putting out as well.
- The Narrator Returns
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
This appears to be the first big festival flameout so far, with it getting surprisingly bad reactions out of Toronto. There's not even much praise going around for Washington's performance (I've seen the phrase "the rare bad Denzel performance" thrown around already).
- Cremildo
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:19 pm
- Location: Brazil
- Contact:
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
I think it's the second big flameout, after The Current War.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
I don't know that anyone but the Weinsteins thought that was going anywhere
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Seeing some other impressions comparing its tone to something like Inherent Vice, and stating that particularly after Nightcrawler, this film is unsettlingly conflict-free but loaded up with plot in its second half. Considering how difficult it's been for many to come around to Inherent Vice's thorny pleasures, I could certainly see how Gilroy won't get nearly as much benefit of the doubt as Anderson (by way of Pynchon, no less) did.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Based on all available evidence, I think you may be setting yourself up for disappointment if you're expecting Inherent Vice and not, say, any generic 90s movie that could have garnered these identical criticisms
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Considering that I'm not particularly interested in Dan Gilroy's Inherent Vice, I think I'm setting myself up for disappointment either way
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Maybe it's Gilroy's WarGames and the only way to win is to not (push) play
- Ribs
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
There's not been a totally universal antipathy- some people think Denzel is great, just weird! More of a Black Mass reaction.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Not helping, Ribs.Ribs wrote:More of a Black Mass reaction.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Honestly I'm in the mood for Dan Gilroy's cheap '90s Cinemax thriller so I guess this is for me.
- PfR73
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
I saw this last night at Austin Film Festival, and while not amazing, I found it better than the reviews had made it out to be. Turns out, per Dan Gilroy in the post-screening Q&A, he heavily re-edited the film after TIFF. Thirteen minutes have been cut, the film has been restructured (he specifically mentioned that a scene at the Staples Center in the middle of the film originally took place near the very end), and source music cues have been changed.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
It was a late addition to the Philadelphia Film Festival - I'm guessing that the reception from TIFF that resulted in the retooling was coupled with the need to get the new cut out in front of audiences and get some feedback on whether the changes were worthwhile or not - if it was widely acclaimed the studio would've probably just sat on it until its release date (not sure that Columbia is necessarily a huge late-year film festival presence the way the upstarts like A24 and Neon are). Glad to hear it was an improvement, but I'd be lying if I didn't say the critical reception kept me away from picking up tickets for it.
-
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:32 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
The plot gets in the way of a really good character study. Been seeing some comparisons to movies like Rainman, but I think that's selling the writing here short. This has a lot more in common with 70s stuff like Five Easy Pieces and Straight Time.
Ignore the trailers that try to paint the character as goofy and quirky.
Ignore the trailers that try to paint the character as goofy and quirky.
- HitchcockLang
- Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:43 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
I saw this a couple nights ago thanks to MoviePass and while I was more or less entertained the whole time, I found it to be a wildly inconsistent mess. I went in knowing nothing about it, and it took me quite a while to discover what the movie was even trying to accomplish. The tone seemed to change drastically for each act, from a preachy melodrama to a romcom wish-fulfillment fantasy to a suspense thriller and back to preachy melodrama. Similarly, the characters seemed wildly inconsistent, not changing organically with their experiences but swinging wildly from one pole to another and seemingly at random to suit whatever tangent the plot was on at that time. None of the characters' actions or motivations ever felt believable or earned.
I did, however, enjoy Washington's performance, but it felt more like watching a character-acting exercise in a vacuum than a great character interacting with the story around him.
I did, however, enjoy Washington's performance, but it felt more like watching a character-acting exercise in a vacuum than a great character interacting with the story around him.
- Ribs
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
SpoilerShow
I... was not expecting wacky walking idiosyncracy character Roman J. Israel to be murdered violently while in the middle of a catchphrase at the end of this movie. Like, in the context of the movie it makes sense, but I can’t think of a film other than Irrational Man that ended particularly this way despite being billed as a kind of fun if weird prestige piece. It’s just... a very strong tonal whiplash.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
I clicked that spoiler box since I’ll probably never see this film based upon its critical reception and despite it being “spoiled” for me I absolutely am going to see it now
- Big Ben
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Same. I saw it and went "Sign me right the fuck up."mfunk9786 wrote:I clicked that spoiler box since I’ll probably never see this film based upon its critical reception and despite it being “spoiled” for me I absolutely am going to see it now
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Really? My reaction was "Glad I didn't bother in the first place"
- Ribs
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
It also has the most hilarious understanding of the passage of time, because like 4000 things happen in this movie but it only takes place over three weeks. It’s hard to describe but it’s totally impossible the events of this movie could happen in, like, a year, with how many moving pieces involving trials and new policies and moving jobs and constructing buildings, so that they made it three weeks is like a weird joke.
- mfunk9786
- Under Chris' Protection
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
MoviePass, baby!domino harvey wrote:Really? My reaction was "Glad I didn't bother in the first place"
- Black Hat
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:34 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Roman J. Israel, Esq. (Dan Gilroy, 2017)
Ha, I'm surprised you feel this way as I saw no other way for this ludicrousness to end. I totally don't remember what the catchphrase was tho, what was it? I thought the funniest about this was a tie between Carmen Ejogo being attracted to this man, whatever Colin Farrell was doing and the vegans raging.Ribs wrote:SpoilerShowI... was not expecting wacky walking idiosyncracy character Roman J. Israel to be murdered violently while in the middle of a catchphrase at the end of this movie. Like, in the context of the movie it makes sense, but I can’t think of a film other than Irrational Man that ended particularly this way despite being billed as a kind of fun if weird prestige piece. It’s just... a very strong tonal whiplash.