Carney-vàle!

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#101 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:06 am

^Agree. And it's a bummer when well-meaning folks show up to the anti-war rally with "Free Leonard Peltier" or "Legalize Marijuana" signs, if I may draw a comparison. Obscures the issue, diffuses the energy, blunts the effect. I wish people would stay on-point in matters like these. This has nothing directly to do with Ray Carney's tenure.

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#102 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:34 pm

How is fraudulently putting a lien on someone's artistic property connected directly to the tenure system in the United States?

EDIT: I should add that I am a musician, and I had an ex-collaborator refuse to return my 2-inch masters, claiming--with no basis in fact, either written, spoken, or imagined--that I had agreed to pay him money for studio time. He came close to admitting to me that he was lying and simply doing this on a "business basis"--in other words, he knew, in spite of there being no contract, that enough time had elapsed with the tapes in his possession, he could possibly win in court and yet bank on the fact that my broke ass would never take him to court. He had even been advised by a friend in the music industry to do this! Fortunately, the only advantage I lose is being able to do a new mix on reel-to-reel machinery; I can still reproduce the recording. But I honestly believe that this guy has deluded himself into thinking that this is appropriate behavior--"Hey, man, nothing personal, it's just business," as he said to me once. I think this is extremely common practice in this country, at least.

I think my story, which has nothing to do with academia, is more directly applicable to Rappaport's situation, because it invokes issues of property rights, and the growing chasm between what is considered "legal" and what is considered, by most compassionate people's accounts, simple human decency. In my mind, tenure does not enable this behavior, except perhaps indirectly, assuming that Rappaport trusted Carney more given the latter's academic status. Perhaps it influenced him to relinquish his work to Carney, but it seemed more like the two were, before anything else, simply good friends, and that his tenured status had very little to do with Rappaport's decision. I obviously know neither one of them, but I thought I would respond more fully to your contention that the tenure system is what is directly at fault here. I think blaming tenure in the U.S., as the commenter did on the web petition, muddles the issue. Denying tenure to professors would obviously not solve the problem.

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#103 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:01 pm

David, I think we're discussing this at cross purposes. You are considering consequences, not causes. Certainly, he should lose his tenure, his job, etc. But the object here--first and foremost--is for Rappaport to have his work returned. And, ideally, to have this kind of behavior discouraged in the justice system, no matter what position the thief holds, be it beggar, executive, tenured professor, soda jerk.

As for academia, who would ever look to a university for some kind of moral precedent? I wouldn't say, having been through a doctoral program, that this has been a moment of disillusionment for me. Professors are no better, and often worse, than the rest of us.

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#104 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:03 am

I won't! :wink:

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Carney-vàle!

#105 Post by Jeff » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:04 pm

Carney responds to The Rappaport Situation, casts himself as a victim of blackmail, extortion, "cyberbullying."

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Carney-vàle!

#106 Post by Mr Sausage » Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:07 pm

Jeff wrote:Carney responds to The Rappaport Situation, casts himself as a victim of blackmail, extortion, "cyberbullying."
Whatever the actual truth value of that is, I have no doubt that Ray Carney believes every single word of it. I don't think he's uttered a single conscious untruth.

Robert de la Cheyniest
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#107 Post by Robert de la Cheyniest » Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:06 pm

Man oh man, I had a hard time even getting past the first paragraph of that piece.

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#108 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:38 pm

That a) he (unadvisedly) publicizes his legal squabbles on a website purporting to expose the oppressive bureaucracies at B.U. and b) he consequently associates Rappaport with those institutional grievances is disingenuous and galling.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#109 Post by matrixschmatrix » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:11 am

I'm find his claim that he has ironclad proof that the reels were gifted, were worthless in the first place, and were otherwise going to be trashed pretty dubious- like, why would he bother writing a million word screed about how right he is, rather than just posting the relevant documentation and making Rapaport look like an idiot?

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#110 Post by Perkins Cobb » Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:48 pm

"I appreciate Carney’s concern in trying to exhonorate [sic] himself, even though I couldn’t make it through the letter, despite the fact that it’s mostly about me." Mark Rappaport responds. Also, Jon Jost chimes in, Ben Safdie sticks up for Carney, and blah blah blah, and why is this playing out on Mubi? Good grief.

User avatar
dustybooks
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:52 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: Carney-vàle!

#111 Post by dustybooks » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:58 pm

None of this is funny, I know, but I am greatly amused by the suggestion someone makes there of a "moderated Mubi trial."

Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#112 Post by Perkins Cobb » Sun Mar 17, 2013 1:20 am

Mubi is hereby found guilty.

lefeufollet
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:54 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Carney-vàle!

#113 Post by lefeufollet » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:04 pm


User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#114 Post by matrixschmatrix » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:21 pm

Rappaport certainly seems to have better foundation for whatever terms he uses- assuming he's not actually fabricating documents, it certainly does appear that Carney dramatically changed his story from one to the other. Though admittedly I'm inclined to read Rappaport's side more favorably, since Carney seems like such an asshole.

User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:56 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#115 Post by whaleallright » Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:48 pm

I think we should all be able to agree that Boston University violating their contract with Carney over accusations that have yet to be admitted or proven in open court would be cause for great concern. I have no love for Carney at all, and I'm inclined not to believe his version of events, but I'm neither an arbitrator nor a member of a jury nor a judge.

User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:56 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#116 Post by whaleallright » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:31 pm

n/a
Last edited by whaleallright on Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Carney-vàle!

#117 Post by Mr Sausage » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:38 pm

jonah.77 wrote:Once again, I say this as someone who thinks Carney has done more harm than good as a film scholar.
I'm not really up on Carney's actual scholarly work. Would you mind expanding?

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Carney-vàle!

#118 Post by Mr Sausage » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:07 pm

david hare wrote:
jonah.77 wrote:The rest of your post does not merit a response.
Sausage he boasts of never having seen Citizen Kane and one of his central platforms is to "hate Hollywood."
Really? I remember reading some tirade against that movie's "fakeness" on the one brief scan I made of his website years ago.

User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:56 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#119 Post by whaleallright » Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:30 am

...
Last edited by whaleallright on Mon May 27, 2013 6:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: Carney-vàle!

#120 Post by Michael Kerpan » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:29 pm

jonah.77 wrote: Frankly, folks on both sides of this debate are behaving like children.
Perhaps, but denying someone access to their own work (for quite a long time now) is pretty seriously problematic. I don't think one treat the two sides as equally culpable.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#121 Post by matrixschmatrix » Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:14 pm

jonah.77 wrote:That said, I think he deserves due process like anyone else caught in a controversy that is, of now, just volleys of hearsay. If Jost and Rappaport did indeed try to get him fired, that's contemptible.
I don't think there's any reason to believe that's the case. The topic came up because david hare suggested that this situation might constitute grounds for breaking tenure, not because any of the concerned parties mentioned it. I honestly don't see any reason to believe Rappaport's done anything wrong, here.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#122 Post by Gregory » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:48 pm

jonah.77 wrote:Frankly, folks on both sides of this debate are behaving like children.
On behalf of a couple of billion children, I'd like to say that comparing them to Ray Carney is unwarranted and unfair.

onedimension
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:35 pm

Re: Carney-vàle!

#123 Post by onedimension » Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:37 pm

I'm not big on Carney's work now, although I was a fan as, I guess, a teenager- age 18 or 19, read his website publications and took a lot of his film recommendations (most of them good, to his credit). But now what I remember of his site- indulgent interviews that feel like Carney wrote the questions, too, simplistic anti-Hollywood screeds (he had one 'heroic' anecdote about yelling at a secretary who called wanting him to prepare copy or something for the Academy Awards), and a cult of personality sprung up through his fan letters- he doesn't strike me as the same kind of Truth-Telling Outsider..

That said, whatever his biases and personal tendencies, and however melodramatically he and Jost/Rappaport/etc. have behaved, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to envision an alternative version of events that's not as simple as Carney-the-deceiver victimizing the naive filmmaker..

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Carney-vàle!

#124 Post by Mr Sausage » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:10 pm

onedimension wrote:That said, whatever his biases and personal tendencies, and however melodramatically he and Jost/Rappaport/etc. have behaved, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to envision an alternative version of events that's not as simple as Carney-the-deceiver victimizing the naive filmmaker.
Consistency tells you a lot. Whose account has remained consistent? Jost/Rappaport have been very consistent with each one of their charges. Ray Carney, on the other hand, has provided nothing but shifty, hazy, changing accounts of what happened. I know immediately who to trust, and it's not the person who alters their story bit by bit to keep consistent with the facts as they come out..

albucat
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:06 am

Re: Carney-vàle!

#125 Post by albucat » Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:29 pm

If Jost and Rappaport did indeed try to get him fired, that's contemptible. Frankly, folks on both sides of this debate are behaving like children.
I'm not really sure what people think Jost and Rappaport and their many supporter should do to actually get the films back at this point. Pretend that this isn't happening? Not become increasingly angry as time goes by and the films in Carney's hands? Not try to get the public on their side? Getting Carney fired seems like a last resort... but what other recourse do they eventually have? I put myself in Rappaport's place and, frankly, I'd do whatever I could at this point in the insanity to get my materials back. It's not like this is a situation that seems to be resolving itself, and the idea that this should be emotionless seems pretty ridiculous to me.

I'm also not very clear on how losing a job, when you could easily find employment at many other universities (as someone of Carney's stature, both despite and perhaps because of his infamy, could do) is as bad as large-scale robbery and repeatedly lying to a "friend." I guess I also don't understand how a person could feign that both sides are equally in the right here, so I'm not going to pretend I'm unbiased here.

Post Reply