Artificial Eye / Curzon Film World

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Cinema Guild, and more.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
kidc85
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:15 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1426 Post by kidc85 » Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 pm

rattlebag wrote:There is currently a great AE sale on in Fopp. Loads of films for a fiver and boxsets for £15. Satantango is a bargain at £12.
I owe you a major thank you. Picked up the Angelopoulos Collection for £15, alongside a whole bunch of other great stuff.

rattlebag
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1427 Post by rattlebag » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:12 pm

kidc85 wrote: I owe you a major thank you. Picked up the Angelopoulos Collection for £15, alongside a whole bunch of other great stuff.
You are welcome! I bought the third Angelopoulos boxset and I'm kicking myself for buying the second one two weeks ago! Same goes for the first Arrow Fassbinder box that they had in for £15. Although I mustn't complain as I got some gems.

peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1428 Post by peerpee » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:27 pm

I've just abandoned a late-night screening of Sokurov's FAUST on Blu-ray due to what looks like massive embedded interlacing that I couldn't take my eyes off. I've tried it on two players, all my other Blus play great – it's definitely this disc. It's apparent right away from the opening text credits, which are noticeably lined. Stepping through on pause reveals that every frame of the film is interlaced and it looks like a badly encoded DVD.

If you click the Beaver pics to get the full image and look closely at each grab, you can see the lines clearly. Beaver says: "The 1080P supports the film's idiosyncrasies as adeptly as possible which includes some horizontal lines - mostly imperceptible in standard viewing." --- Why would part of Sokurov's visual aesthetic be to introduce the sort of interlacing we're familiar with from PAL > NTSC conversions? It doesn't make any sense. I realise that I'm highly perceptive to these issues, but this surely can't be supposed to look like this? It looks bobbins.

Something really shit has gone on somewhere here. There is also massive compression artefact blooming in shadows. Looks like a duff encode and a recall to me.

Are there any other Blu-rays of this film available in other territories? Are they similarly afflicted?
Last edited by peerpee on Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:16 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1429 Post by warren oates » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:52 pm

This is so disappointing. My copy is en route from the UK... Shit. I was so psyched to see this... And there's no U.S. release on the horizon.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: Artificial Eye

#1430 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:54 pm

There's an Italian Blu-ray (no English subs). No idea how it looks, though I've seen the Italian DVD and it looks fine. It's certainly not interlaced.

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Artificial Eye

#1431 Post by Oedipax » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:48 pm

The Italian blu does NOT have the same issues. It must be something strictly on AE's end. I hope they get it sorted!

peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1432 Post by peerpee » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:51 am

The film was shot on film with Arricams. I'm wondering whether at some point in post, during all the digital FX work, someone somewhere has done a poor conversion to or from 1080/50i (25fps > 24fps, or 24fps > 25fps) and embedded the interlacing in a 1080/24p master that AE couldn't unravel? With AE simply encoding that to BD? (ie. the HD tape AE were sent looked like this?)

It beggars belief that these "lines" are part of Sokurov's aesthetic.

User avatar
bigP
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Reading, UK

Re: Artificial Eye

#1433 Post by bigP » Wed Aug 29, 2012 2:32 pm

HMV are listing a Dardenne Brothers Collection 6 DVD box set, for December 10th.

Calvin
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:12 am

Re: Artificial Eye

#1434 Post by Calvin » Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:21 pm

Bresson's Mouchette is also slated for December 10th. DVD-only.

User avatar
HJackson
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1435 Post by HJackson » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:20 am

Is Nouveaux Pictures dead or something? COME AND SEE, CRANES ARE FLYING and MOUCHETTE are now Artificial Eye, their Resnais and Godard films are now handled by Studio Canal. How soon until people in the UK can expect a decent copy of 8½ (Nouveux's disc of that was a real turd, right up there with Second Sight's 4x3 letterboxed GIRL CAN'T HELP IT)?

Calvin
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:12 am

Re: Artificial Eye

#1436 Post by Calvin » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:27 am

HJackson wrote:Is Nouveaux Pictures dead or something? COME AND SEE, CRANES ARE FLYING and MOUCHETTE are now Artificial Eye, their Resnais and Godard films are now handled by Studio Canal. How soon until people in the UK can expect a decent copy of 8½ (Nouveux's disc of that was a real turd, right up there with Second Sight's 4x3 letterboxed GIRL CAN'T HELP IT)?
I don't know whether or not they are still functioning but even if they are, they probably won't be around for much longer. Their non-Fellini big titles have been re-released by Artificial Eye, Arrow and Studio Canal. Their last release was Suspiria, back in 2010.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Artificial Eye

#1437 Post by MichaelB » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:59 pm

Calvin wrote:Their last release was Suspiria, back in 2010.
...which was supposed to be part of a series that never materialised.

A shame: once I'd tuned out the toe-curlingly patronising "taking trash seriously" tagline, I was rather impressed with the extras on that disc - they had a fair bit more substance than the usual self-congratulatory puff pieces.

User avatar
feckless boy
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1438 Post by feckless boy » Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:30 am

Beaver on The Turin Horse. Is that a new bitrate record?

User avatar
martin
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:16 am
Contact:

Re: Artificial Eye

#1439 Post by martin » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:29 am

I've made a list of specifications for a lot of French films on blu-ray, and I think I've seen video bitrates approaching 40,000 kbs. 35 Mbs is very high though.

User avatar
GaryC
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:56 pm
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire, UK

Re: Artificial Eye

#1440 Post by GaryC » Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:16 am

It's not quite true that the only extra on the UK disc (DVD) of The Turin Horse is the short Hotel Magnezit - there's also the trailer, all 44 seconds of it. The feature is 1.66:1 anamorphic with a Dolby 2.0 soundtrack.

Two other AE titles I've received DVD checkdiscs for are:

Goodbye First Love - 1.85:1 anamorphic. Dolby 5.1 & 2.0. The only extra is the trailer, though there are adverts for Curzon On Demand at the start.

Corpo Celeste - 1.85:1 anamorphic. Dolby 5.1 and 2.0. Extras: the trailer plus a 40-minute interview with the director and producer. This interview looks odd - it's 16:9 anamorphic but seems like it was shot in 4:3 and has been horizontally stretched. This may of course not be the case on the retail copies.

Picture quality looks fine at a brief glance. Corpo Celeste looks particularly grainy, but then it was shot on 16mm.

Most Artificial Eye DVDs I've seen recently have been region-free, but these three are Region 2 only.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Artificial Eye

#1441 Post by MichaelB » Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:20 am

Excellent news - I'm glad I waited for the Beaver comparison. Nice though the additional Cinema Guild extras undoubtedly are, the short was the only thing I was really interested in, and the Artificial Eye disc will be significantly cheaper for the UK-based likes of me.

User avatar
The Fanciful Norwegian
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack

Re: Artificial Eye

#1442 Post by The Fanciful Norwegian » Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:06 am

feckless boy wrote:Beaver on The Turin Horse. Is that a new bitrate record?
There's a lengthy list here. A few IMAX documentaries released in the early days of BD apparently used constant-bitrate 40Mbps encodes, though it doesn't seem to have helped the PQ much. Anime titles from Japan regularly exceed 35Mbps. Two of the most surprising high-bitrate titles on the list are The Simpsons Movie and 28 Days Later (!!!).

peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1443 Post by peerpee » Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:41 pm

Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?

User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: Artificial Eye

#1444 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:20 am

peerpee wrote:Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?
Thanks to you we've all cancelled our orders.

rattlebag
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1445 Post by rattlebag » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:29 am

NABOB OF NOWHERE wrote:
peerpee wrote:Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?
Thanks to you we've all cancelled our orders.
Seconded!

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1446 Post by Matt » Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:35 pm

Thirded.

peerpee
not perpee
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:41 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1447 Post by peerpee » Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:52 pm

Shitting hell. I was really looking forward to my first Sokurov on BD. It's terrible when a small but enthusiastic crowd of folk all bail on an anticipated release because of flaws that should have been caught in QC. If for some reason Sokurov stands by this master, I would ask "does he stand by this particular Blu-ray encode? Has he been shown the lines, and is he happy with that?"

Reminiscences of a retired producer #482: I once rejected a master of a film by a famous French director, and was told "the director is happy with this master, he has signed it off". I said "He can't have. He seriously can't have. The master is horizontally stretched, the lab have made a pig's ear of a 1.66:1 anamorphic master, and this is definitely not right." They insisted it was fine. I insisted it wasn't. I refused to budge. Weeks later they eventually called in the director to the lab to look at the master I rejected, he was horrified, and had them redo it in HD. The lab got a bollocking.

Mathew2468
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:40 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1448 Post by Mathew2468 » Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:33 pm

Was that Alain Resnais?

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1449 Post by zedz » Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:58 pm

(a bit late, but) Fourthed.

You're a regular Dr Mabuse, peerpee, orchestrating international market manipulations through the power of your mind.

User avatar
RossyG
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:50 pm

Re: Artificial Eye

#1450 Post by RossyG » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:59 pm

Fifthed.

I had a nice under a tenner pre-order, too, but if it's buggered up I can't be bothered with the hassle.

What you've never seen you never miss.

Post Reply