Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
She apparently hasn't succeeded in being defeated yet.
-
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:38 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Sarah Palin's unprecedented rating system: 32 1/2 stars! That *is* hard to beat, you must give her that, folks.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Maybe that stands for how many American states she approves of, which begs the question of which one only got half marks.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
That's fake. If I'm wrong I'd rather be dead.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Right from Blu-ray.com. I'd say it's temp art, except they're obviously trying to approximate actual Super 8 boxes, which means someone actually thought that was a good idea and designed that
-
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:09 am
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Even the box has a lens flare!
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
The cover works though, because everyone knows what a Super 8 box looks like.
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
At least Warner Bros is consistent with their shitty Judy Garland Blu-ray covers:
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
One of us, one of us.
- Jeff
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
- Location: Denver, CO
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
I think the Super 8 cover is kind of clever, but have to agree that those with nostalgic feelings towards super 8 film cartons probably do not constitute the film's target audience.
-
- Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:46 am
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
After you pointed that out, the Super 8 cover doesn't look so bad. Still, I agree that the effect is diminished when it has to be explained.
The Meet Me In St. Louis looks so tacky, but it isn't enough to put me off buying it. That's a highly anticipated Blu for me.
The Meet Me In St. Louis looks so tacky, but it isn't enough to put me off buying it. That's a highly anticipated Blu for me.
- CSM126
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
- Location: The Room
- Contact:
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
I take it the asterisk refers you to a footnote saying "actually ghost-directed by Spielberg. You know, like Poltergeist!".
- Roger Ryan
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
As someone who actually shot a lot of Super 8mm footage in the 70s...I didn't immediate get that the Blu-ray cover was aping the old Kodachrome box design. I recall the boxes being a little more orange myself, but that might have been the faster speed version that featured a blue bar on the packaging. Either way, a red bar on yellow doesn't make me feel instantly nostalgic.
- Gregory
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
The way they're positioned makes no sense spatially, so one is left to wonder if the film features a 1 1/2-foot Rex Harrison, or a 20-foot Audrey Hepburn.
- tarpilot
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:48 am
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Either scenario would make that movie exponentially more interesting
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
I wouldn't mind a lil portable Rex Harrison. Perfect for emergency quips and snide putdowns
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Rex's eyeline seems to be about level with Audrey's bow area though, which cannot have been unintentional, given Rex's expression.
Although the size difference does make it look as if Audrey could take her giant hat off and throw it entirely over him if she got annoyed with his gaze.
Although the size difference does make it look as if Audrey could take her giant hat off and throw it entirely over him if she got annoyed with his gaze.
- manicsounds
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Maybe not "worst" cover, but the back of my "American Grafitti" German disc lists a video commentary by "John Lucas". (George's brother, perhaps?)
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Just for the egregious spelling mistake ... one I'm particularly sensitive to.
- swo17
- Bloodthirsty Butcher
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
- Location: SLC, UT
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
What egregious spelling mistake?
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
It's Ed O'Neill, not "O'Neil" ... like Will O'Neillswo17 wrote:What egregious spelling mistake?
It's not a huge error, maybe just a typo, but if I was an actor, I'd like to credited properly on a dvd cover.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Looks fixed in the version on Mill Creek's website
- willoneill
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:10 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Good ... Amazon must have just had temp art.