It is currently Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:24 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 639 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:40 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
knives wrote:
First off, great now you've got me worried. Secondly what's "Jean Doumanian's late 90's purge"?

I think we need to keep this "worry" in perspective. Now that I've learned the casting director worked on Slumdog Millionaire it sounds less like a producer's decision, and more just savvy work by Gail Stevens. If anything seeing as how she's familiar with Woody's methods given she cast Scoop and Match Point, Pinto seems like a happy coincidence - a buzz worthy actress and hopefully someone Stevens feels can work comfortably and quickly with Allen. MediaPro I'm sure is thrilled, and like my guess above, probably ok-ed the salary and upped the budget, because now they have a whole new Asian market to work with and a potential larger younger market worldwide as well.


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:57 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:34 am
Location: Portland, OR
AWA wrote:
It is clearly the result of Woody having no real experience in overseeing the scoring of original music for a film and how it works within the film itself and it also speaks to how Woody wouldn't dare second guess Glass' contributions, even though it probably would've been best to do so sometimes. He says as much in the Lax "Conversations..." book.

Oddly, Woody Allen says almost precisely the opposite in Scott Hicks' documentary about Philip Glass last year. There he claims that the reason he usually doesn't work with composers is that he feels so bad telling them what they've worked so hard on isn't working in the film, but that Philip Glass had no problem at all completely rewriting his cues several times and this made their collaboration much easier than previous experiences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Kirkinson wrote:
AWA wrote:
It is clearly the result of Woody having no real experience in overseeing the scoring of original music for a film and how it works within the film itself and it also speaks to how Woody wouldn't dare second guess Glass' contributions, even though it probably would've been best to do so sometimes. He says as much in the Lax "Conversations..." book.

Oddly, Woody Allen says almost precisely the opposite in Scott Hicks' documentary about Philip Glass last year. There he claims that the reason he usually doesn't work with composers is that he feels so bad telling them what they've worked so hard on isn't working in the film, but that Philip Glass had no problem at all completely rewriting his cues several times and this made their collaboration much easier than previous experiences.

Digging out my copy of Conversations it appears my memory was focused on this part:

Woody wrote:
The funny thing is, his music is so riddled with apprehension. I'd say, "This is a casual scene. The music seems to apprehensive." And he'd say, "Oh, no, that's the romantic stuff. The apprehensive stuff I'm saving for the murder." I was thinking, My God, what is going to happen?

He does mention instances where Glass did do some re-writes and, as Woody always is, lavishes praise on him despite having some reservations about the whole thing (as indicated in the above quote, which addresses my criticism of the film's score and the fact that Woody should've spoken up about the music a bit more). He also says that even though he considers Glass a genius, he still prefers working with "the record collection".

Either way - the Glass score failed Woody in that film IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Antoine Doinel wrote:
knives wrote:
First off, great now you've got me worried. Secondly what's "Jean Doumanian's late 90's purge"?

I think we need to keep this "worry" in perspective. Now that I've learned the casting director worked on Slumdog Millionaire it sounds less like a producer's decision, and more just savvy work by Gail Stevens. If anything seeing as how she's familiar with Woody's methods given she cast Scoop and Match Point, Pinto seems like a happy coincidence - a buzz worthy actress and hopefully someone Stevens feels can work comfortably and quickly with Allen. MediaPro I'm sure is thrilled, and like my guess above, probably ok-ed the salary and upped the budget, because now they have a whole new Asian market to work with and a potential larger younger market worldwide as well.

Agreed - that figure could well be an error in reporting and/or Juliet might still be involved and it just hasn't been confirmed by anyone yet... we don't know.

But there is evidence here for a cause for concern considering that Pinto states in the article that Woody's interest stemmed from the Oscars.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:53 pm 

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:20 pm
Let's relax, people. It's all speculation at this point.

I really think it's laughable to consider Woody has given up almost 40 years of uncompromised filmmaking and decided to accept some intrusion from MediaPro. I would believe this if he had only flops in the last decade and was forced to accept suggestions from studio executives. But he has Match Point and Vicky Cristina Barcelona, both huge hits at the box office and an Oscar just last month.

Why would he give up his freedom at this point of his career? It's just ridiculous. If they made a deal with Mediapro I'm sure Letty was very careful to make this clear: Woody is the decision maker. They're just bankers.

And the 3 million report on Pinto's paycheck is also a fabrication from the gossip magazines that are currently crazy on her. They are now saying she is the next Bond girl.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Since the 90's, he has had the occasional breakdown of complete freedom - supposedly the Dreamworks deal stipulated he could only make comedies in colour, for instance. So it is not inconceivable that, at this point in his career, he was unable to get a $20m+ budget without making at least one concession.

It is speculation, and I suppose it will be sometime before this is confirmed or denied, but Pinto herself did note that the Woody offer came immediately following the Oscars, so that is the reason she is in Woody's film, which, as stated above several times, is indeed unusual.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:49 pm 

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:19 am
MHerzog wrote:
I really think it's laughable to consider Woody has given up almost 40 years of uncompromised filmmaking and decided to accept some intrusion from MediaPro. I would believe this if he had only flops in the last decade and was forced to accept suggestions from studio executives. But he has Match Point and Vicky Cristina Barcelona, both huge hits at the box office and an Oscar just last month.

Why would he give up his freedom at this point of his career? It's just ridiculous. If they made a deal with Mediapro I'm sure Letty was very careful to make this clear: Woody is the decision maker. They're just bankers.

Totally agree. This discussion - and one similar to it at imdb - is a load of longwinded nonsense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Fielding wrote:
MHerzog wrote:
I really think it's laughable to consider Woody has given up almost 40 years of uncompromised filmmaking and decided to accept some intrusion from MediaPro. I would believe this if he had only flops in the last decade and was forced to accept suggestions from studio executives. But he has Match Point and Vicky Cristina Barcelona, both huge hits at the box office and an Oscar just last month.

Why would he give up his freedom at this point of his career? It's just ridiculous. If they made a deal with Mediapro I'm sure Letty was very careful to make this clear: Woody is the decision maker. They're just bankers.

Totally agree. This discussion - and one similar to it at imdb - is a load of longwinded nonsense.

Perhaps you'd like to proclaim your authority on the subject here again by stating something to be true simply because you said it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:05 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
The New Yorker has a new short story by Allen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Woody Allen doesn't like American Apparel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:19 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
The American Apparel case is going to trail. Allen accuses the company of using a "scorched earth" policy in their (weak) defence of using his image without permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:17 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: Lebanon, PA
Quote:
"Certainly, our belief is that after the various sex scandals that Woody Allen has been associated with, corporate America's desire to have Woody Allen endorse their product is not what he may believe it is."

Certainly this company believed Allen's image had some value for promotion or they wouldn't have used it on a billboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:23 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
HarryLong wrote:
Quote:
"Certainly, our belief is that after the various sex scandals that Woody Allen has been associated with, corporate America's desire to have Woody Allen endorse their product is not what he may believe it is."

Certainly this company believed Allen's image had some value for promotion or they wouldn't have used it on a billboard.

Exactly. Add on top of that the fact that Woody has made around $250million off his films alone in the past 4 years, easily the most financially successful he's ever been in his entire career, and you have to wonder what kind of incompetent lawyer firm AA has representing them that would base their defence on such absurdly stupid ideas. Not only is it no defence for using his image without permission, it also sabotages themselves and disregards the facts of what has been going on with Woody's career of late. Not to mention the whole thing being completely tactless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
American Apparel knows exactly what they're doing and they're letting this go to trial for the free publicity they'll get. Like using porn stars for their ads, or selling gay porn mags in their stores, it gets headlines and gives them free word of mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Oh no doubt - but that still doesn't make losing $10million+ in the middle of a recession a good idea. Somehow I doubt whatever notoriety they gain out of this probably isn't going to worth spending over $10m on right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm
Quote:
Slotnick said it was not a cheap shot to bring up Allen's sex life in a lawsuit over the billboard and Internet ads. "It's certainly relevant in assessing the value of an endorsement," he said, noting that Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps lost endorsement power after a photograph surfaced of him using marijuana.

Obviously the lawsuit is not about what Allen's endorsement should be worth.
What a loathsome company, using quasi-blackmail tactics and yet maintaining its purity and blamelessness by asserting that Allen already ruined his own reputation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Allen's lawyers are working to stop Mia Farrow and Larry Flynt from testifying.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 12:41 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:25 am
Antoine Doinel wrote:
Allen's lawyers are working to stop Mia Farrow and Larry Flynt from testifying.

I understand their motives to Farrow, but what relationship did Allen have with Flynt? Or do they just want to talk to him about cartoons he might have ran making fun of Allen?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sat May 09, 2009 3:39 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm
Woody's opera staging is going to Spoleto, Italy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sat May 09, 2009 8:33 pm 

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:24 am
AWA wrote:
Add on top of that the fact that Woody has made around $250million off his films alone in the past 4 years

That's a surprising figure. How has he made $250 million off his films in the past 4 years? Which films of his have been that popular? MATCH POINT may have made some money, but how much actually made it to Woody's pocket.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 4:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Vic Pardo wrote:
AWA wrote:
Add on top of that the fact that Woody has made around $250million off his films alone in the past 4 years

That's a surprising figure. How has he made $250 million off his films in the past 4 years? Which films of his have been that popular? MATCH POINT may have made some money, but how much actually made it to Woody's pocket.

I'm sure the Weinstein's give him a pretty good expense account...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 5:28 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:25 am
Perhaps the figure refers to money made from ALL his films during four years, not the films FROM the last four years? I could see him still receiving due royalties for DVDs, TV broadcasts, etc.

Just speculatin'…


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 7:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Dov Charney speaks and now says they won't be calling Mia Farrow or Soon-Yi to the stand and makes a fairly idiotic defense of using Allen's image without his permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 6:06 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
nsps wrote:
Perhaps the figure refers to money made from ALL his films during four years, not the films FROM the last four years? I could see him still receiving due royalties for DVDs, TV broadcasts, etc.

That is approximately how much his films made at the worldwide box office alone in the past four years, yes. Match Point did $90m, Scoop $40m, Cassandra's Dream $25m and VCB did over $90m (and still rising). This doesn't include any kind of estimate on DVD sales of new and older titles, how much he makes touring Europe with his band in December and January and his real estate investments.

He's probably not worth $250m but the fact that AA's claim that his value is decreased couldn't have come at a worse time with Woody's financial pull at, arguably, the highest it has ever been.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Woody Allen
PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 6:47 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Talk (and serious interest) about getting Woody to do a "Vicky Cristina Barcelona" in Brazil:

VARIETY wrote:
Conspiracao has expressed interest in co-producing a future Woody Allen film that would feature Rio as a setting, much as the filmmaker used Barcelona in "Vicky Cristina Barcelona." According to Sa Leitao, RioFilme is also negotiating a potential investment in the project.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 639 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Oedipax


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection