75 Chasing Amy
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: all up in thurr
75 Chasing Amy
Chasing Amy
[img]http://criterion_production.s3.amazonaws.com/release_images/1607/75_chasingamy_w128.jpg[/img]
Chasing Amy is the third installment in the “New Jersey Trilogy” from award-winning writer-director Kevin Smith (Clerks, Mallrats, Dogma). Cult comic-book artist Holden (Ben Affleck) falls in love with fellow artist Alyssa (Joey Lauren Adams), only to be thwarted by her sexuality, the disdain of his best friend Banky (Jason Lee), and his own misgivings about himself. Filled with Smith’s unique ear for dialogue and insight into relationships, Chasing Amy offers a thoughtful, funny look at how perceptions alter lives, and how obsession and self-doubt skew reality.
Special Features
-New widescreen digital transfer enhanced for 16×9 televisions
-Discrete 5.1 channel Dolby® Digital soundtrack
-New video introduction to the DVD edition from director Kevin Smith
-Screen-specific audio commentary by Kevin Smith, producer Scott Mosier, actors Ben Affleck and Jason Mewes, associate producer Robert Hawk, Miramax executive Jon Gordon, and View Askew historian Vincent Pereira
-Ten deleted scenes, plus outtakes
-Trailer
-Special video introductions from the cast and crew
-The Askewniverse Legend: a guide to the characters in the “New Jersey Trilogy”
-English subtitles for the deaf and hearing impaired
-Optimal image quality: RSDL dual-layer edition
Criterionforum.org user rating averages
Feature currently disabled
[img]http://criterion_production.s3.amazonaws.com/release_images/1607/75_chasingamy_w128.jpg[/img]
Chasing Amy is the third installment in the “New Jersey Trilogy” from award-winning writer-director Kevin Smith (Clerks, Mallrats, Dogma). Cult comic-book artist Holden (Ben Affleck) falls in love with fellow artist Alyssa (Joey Lauren Adams), only to be thwarted by her sexuality, the disdain of his best friend Banky (Jason Lee), and his own misgivings about himself. Filled with Smith’s unique ear for dialogue and insight into relationships, Chasing Amy offers a thoughtful, funny look at how perceptions alter lives, and how obsession and self-doubt skew reality.
Special Features
-New widescreen digital transfer enhanced for 16×9 televisions
-Discrete 5.1 channel Dolby® Digital soundtrack
-New video introduction to the DVD edition from director Kevin Smith
-Screen-specific audio commentary by Kevin Smith, producer Scott Mosier, actors Ben Affleck and Jason Mewes, associate producer Robert Hawk, Miramax executive Jon Gordon, and View Askew historian Vincent Pereira
-Ten deleted scenes, plus outtakes
-Trailer
-Special video introductions from the cast and crew
-The Askewniverse Legend: a guide to the characters in the “New Jersey Trilogy”
-English subtitles for the deaf and hearing impaired
-Optimal image quality: RSDL dual-layer edition
Criterionforum.org user rating averages
Feature currently disabled
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: all up in thurr
It's funny that you assume someone named "Martha" is male.
Actually, Chasing Amy is on my horrible list because I think it's a terrible movie (for which I do not blame Affleck). I thought the direction and writer were both horribly confused, and found the inconsistent tone of the film incredibly irritating. I felt like Smith had no idea what he was saying-- sometimes it's hard to tell if he's laughing at his characters or if he actually thinks the stupid shit they're doing is brilliant and clever. Arg.
Actually, Chasing Amy is on my horrible list because I think it's a terrible movie (for which I do not blame Affleck). I thought the direction and writer were both horribly confused, and found the inconsistent tone of the film incredibly irritating. I felt like Smith had no idea what he was saying-- sometimes it's hard to tell if he's laughing at his characters or if he actually thinks the stupid shit they're doing is brilliant and clever. Arg.
- Fletch F. Fletch
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:54 pm
- Location: Provo, Utah
I have to respectfully disagree.Martha wrote:Actually, Chasing Amy is on my horrible list because I think it's a terrible movie (for which I do not blame Affleck). I thought the direction and writer were both horribly confused, and found the inconsistent tone of the film incredibly irritating. I felt like Smith had no idea what he was saying-- sometimes it's hard to tell if he's laughing at his characters or if he actually thinks the stupid shit they're doing is brilliant and clever. Arg.
I find it hard to believe that you have no idea what Smith is trying to say with Chasing Amy. If anything the film is about dealing with one's shortcomings and inadequacies. Holden had a great thing going with Alyssa and then he messes it all up by getting hung up on the whole "finger-cuffs" thing. And then, by the time he figures out what jerk he was, it's too late. But at least, by the film's end, you get the feeling that he's learned something from the experience and is (hopefully) a better person.
Personally, I really like this film. I haven't been too crazy about most of Smith's movies (with the exception of Clerks and Jersey Girl) but this one I think resonates the most and is also his most truthful. There is an honesty to the emotional content of this movie--what the characters are feeling (or not feeling)--that really works for me. There is a sincerity to Chasing Amy that is sorely lacking from most of his other films. Holden's big confessional speech to Alyssa where he tells her how he feels or Silent Bob's "Chasing Amy" story are two examples that I can think of off the top of my head. People may not necessarily speak like this but they certainly have these feelings. And that's what rings true for me.
Also, the film is funny as hell with Hooper X's Star Wars rant at the film's beginning being right on the money. There is also insanely quotable dialogue from the always-reliable Jason Lee ("How can one man be so funny?") who almost outdoes his equally quotable character from Mallrats.
The direction (or lackthereof) slam is an easy stick to beat Smith with and rightly so. He can't direct all that well but I feel that his writing more than makes up for it (and he is getting better in the direction dept. -- Jersey Girl was well-shot).
I guess why this film works so well for me is best summed up by Holden at the end when he says that he finally had something personal to say. That is why Clerks works so well and also Jersey Girl. They are Smith's most personal and sincere works that are actually trying to say something beyond the dick and fart jokes.
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: all up in thurr
Disagree away, Fletch-- I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority in my reaction to the film, and could easily be totally off-base. The problem, of course, is that I disliked it so much that I am never going to sit down and watch it again in order to reevaluate. I just remember being really annoyed by the "hey, let's have a threesome!" thing, mostly because (at the time), while I assumed that we were supposed to think it was a horrible idea, I kept getting these fleeting feelings that Smith actually sort of though the idea was a good one, and that we were maybe supposed to support it. I was probably already annoyed by that point, but that just turned me off completely (though, again, I'm more than willing to acknowledge that I'm a moron and just totally missed the scene).
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: all up in thurr
BWilson wrote:Wow, how open minded.Martha wrote:The problem, of course, is that I disliked it so much that I am never going to sit down and watch it again in order to reevaluate.
It's actually a question of time more than anything else-- if you have the time to sit down and rewatch every movie you don't like that others do, that's awesome for you. I just don't, so when I have some time, I'd rather use it to watch something new or rewatch something I liked (or was intrigued by, etc). Sorry that bothers you.
- cdnchris
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
I think in the mind of the Affleck character the threesome was a good idea, but I can't see Smith thinking it was a good idea. The way it's presented suggests the character still has a lot of growing up to do. Of course, that's what I saw, and what I saw was just another layer to the character being dumbass.
- ben d banana
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: Oh Where, Oh Where?
-
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:06 pm
While rewatching everything you don't like would be a waste of time, rewatching something you had a very strong hatred of (as you seem to) on first viewing can be very valuable. If for no other reason then to reevalute your reasons for disliking it.Martha wrote:
It's actually a question of time more than anything else-- if you have the time to sit down and rewatch every movie you don't like that others do, that's awesome for you. I just don't, so when I have some time, I'd rather use it to watch something new or rewatch something I liked (or was intrigued by, etc). Sorry that bothers you.
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT
Come on! Even Smith admits Mallrats sucked. I believe he publicly apologized for it at Indpendent Spirit.martha, having always thought smith was just okay and arguing w/ folks who love and hate him for the sake of it, i tuned into mallrats for about 20 minutes last week and was absolutely embarrassed by its atrociousness (the dialogue in particular). your time is definitely better spent elsewhere.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Mallrats was made just so Kevin Smith could make money. Funny thing is that the movie was a big box office failure.
I'm really split an Kevin Smith. Clerks and Chasing Amy are excellent films, Mallrats isn't even mediocre, Dogma was a wasted approtunity, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back is just stupid ( only thing I like about this movie is that one scene is filmed near my house), and I refuse to see Jersey Girl (which may end up being good).
Dogma was the most dissapointing. It has great scenes and ideas, but sometimes he was pushing it, like Alanis Morrisette as God. I kepy getting the feeling he just what's to force new ideas and twists, even if they aren't that good.
I'm really split an Kevin Smith. Clerks and Chasing Amy are excellent films, Mallrats isn't even mediocre, Dogma was a wasted approtunity, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back is just stupid ( only thing I like about this movie is that one scene is filmed near my house), and I refuse to see Jersey Girl (which may end up being good).
Dogma was the most dissapointing. It has great scenes and ideas, but sometimes he was pushing it, like Alanis Morrisette as God. I kepy getting the feeling he just what's to force new ideas and twists, even if they aren't that good.
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT
All his movies are made so he can make money (except Chasing Amy, which was his comeback movie) in any interview you see with him he's always saying what a cushy job he has. The man is a sellout, he knows it, we knows it, i'm cool with it. If you need further proof just look at the title of his next film: "The Passion of the Clerks."
- exte
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: NJ
- ben d banana
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:53 pm
- Location: Oh Where, Oh Where?
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT
- skuhn8
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Chico, CA
Chasing Amy is an excellent film? Please. Crap in and crap out. I think Clerks is a blast but as soon as Kevin Smith tried to tackle relationship matters (Amy) or philosohical matters (Dogma) it was perfectly clear that this guy is in way over his head. Idle daydreams of a perpetually pre-adolescent dork. Should stick with slurpy jockeys at 7/11.The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote: I'm really split an Kevin Smith. Clerks and Chasing Amy are excellent films
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
- oldsheperd
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:18 pm
- Location: Rio Rancho/Albuquerque
-
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:21 pm
- Location: Canada
I always thought that Smith was kind of hinting at the hypocrisy of Affleck's character. He didn't have any issues about his girlfriend being a lesbian because girl-on-girl stuff is a male fantasy, but once he found out she was in a three way with two guys that destroyed his idea of her.
that's always been my take on it.
i fully understand the pre-pubescent male fantasy comment made by critics when trashing the film, but i don't feel it holds any water here because (i thought) it was rather obvious that Affleck's character was flawed in his thinking. he was the ass. he brought himself down.
he was caught up in his fantasies, but not Smith.
that's always been my take on it.
i fully understand the pre-pubescent male fantasy comment made by critics when trashing the film, but i don't feel it holds any water here because (i thought) it was rather obvious that Affleck's character was flawed in his thinking. he was the ass. he brought himself down.
he was caught up in his fantasies, but not Smith.
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT