Identify This Movie

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: Identify This Movie

#751 Post by Roger Ryan » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:52 am

Gregory wrote:Don't always trust everything on Wikipedia, obviously, but this is from the page on John Wojtowicz:
In addition, the movie intimated that John 'sold out' Sal Naturile to the police, and although he claims this to be untrue, several attempts were made on John's life following an inmate screening of the movie.
This is kept fairly vague in the film: the FBI agent tells Sonny that they'll "take care" of Sal; Sonny angrily replies that he won't sell out his partner, but then decides not to tell Sal about the exchange. By the time they "escape" in the transport, one gets the feeling that Sonny now believes the FBI agent's statement was an empty threat and that he has successfully negotiated a way out for both Sal and he.

Of course, I can understand that this kind of ambiguity might be missed by Wojtowicz's fellow inmates!

User avatar
filmyfan
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:50 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#752 Post by filmyfan » Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:54 am

Can anyone ID this film-remember seeing it back in the 80's on the BBC..

starts with a lady getting off the tube/subway and follows her as she walks out and up onto street level...the camera follows just her legs/boots and she continues on up the street/sidewalk.only showing her bottom half !

Was in colour I'm sure-feel it was a horror type film-but unsure about that-mid 60's to 70's I think but that maybe wrong..

Can't remember anything else about the film (may not even have watched it all !)-but i remember the start was quite striking !

Bugged me every so often ever since !

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Identify This Movie

#753 Post by MichaelB » Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:09 am

Duncan Hopper wrote:
Feego wrote:Okay, so it's been a month since you posted that JenJay, but that is most definitely Fahrenheit 451. The film, of course, is not black-and-white (perhaps your dad watched it on a B&W TV?), but there is a scene in which Julie Christie goes to the school from which she has been fired to retrieve her things. A teacher slides the bag down the hall, and it seems to eerily float toward her. The whole time, the unseen school children are reciting their multiplication tables.
Probably not related to the above, but I was reminded of seeing a 35mm screening of Fahrenheit 451in Bucharest a few moths ago, I was looking forward to the Nic Roeg photography and was surprised when the film started out in black and white. I had not seen the film in over a decade, so at first I thought maybe I had forgotten the opening was in B&W, but it remained in B&W throughout.

My guess is - as this is not exactly the type of film a communist country would be too pleased to be screening - it is some kind of high level illegal copy made during communism. One would also assume that B&W film stock was much easier and cheaper than colour to get back then. Also (and I'm sure the eastern European experts here could say for sure) another guess is this was common practice back then to illegally copy Hollywood or non communist country films?
What's much more boringly likely is that it was struck for television screenings at a time when black-and-white broadcasts were the norm. Back in my rep cinema management days, I accidentally (well, duh) ended up with a black-and-white print of Black Narcissus once - it had somehow managed to get itself into the standard UK distribution network. Even more embarrassingly, because it never occurred to us that such a thing might happen, we actually showed it to a paying audience, and...

...well, fortunately we were able to get a colour print delivered by the time of the next show - handily, the BFI had one on the premises, and once they'd finished laughing they were happy to let us borrow it at nonexistent notice. And I didn't quibble about refunds.

rwiggum
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:11 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#754 Post by rwiggum » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:07 pm

I'm trying to help a friend find a movie or TV show based on a description of a scene she saw when she was a kid. There was a prom queen, or princess or someone who got trapped in a burning car. All she remembers is a jarring smash cut to a charred tiara sitting on a dashboard. I know it isn't much ...

User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:16 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#755 Post by warren oates » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:30 pm

Could it be De Palma's Carrie?

User avatar
bottled spider
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:59 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#756 Post by bottled spider » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:40 pm

Or Joseph Losey's The Accident? The tiara lying on the dashboard rings a bell, but I don't remember the car burning.

Thomas Dukenfield
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#757 Post by Thomas Dukenfield » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:56 pm

filmyfan wrote:Can anyone ID this film-remember seeing it back in the 80's on the BBC..

starts with a lady getting off the tube/subway and follows her as she walks out and up onto street level...the camera follows just her legs/boots and she continues on up the street/sidewalk.only showing her bottom half !

Was in colour I'm sure-feel it was a horror type film-but unsure about that-mid 60's to 70's I think but that maybe wrong..

Can't remember anything else about the film (may not even have watched it all !)-but i remember the start was quite striking !

Bugged me every so often ever since !
The 1985 French/Canadian co-production Honeymoon has an opening exactly like that. Was she wearing a red dress? Nathalie Baye plays the part BTW.

User avatar
cocaine socialist
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:18 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#758 Post by cocaine socialist » Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:29 pm

Image

User avatar
antnield
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: Identify This Movie

#759 Post by antnield » Sat Mar 30, 2013 6:03 pm

Louis Malle's Ascenseur pour l'échafaud (Elevator to the Gallows).

User avatar
whipsilk
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:54 am
Location: Wilmington, DE

Re: Identify This Movie

#760 Post by whipsilk » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:09 pm

Well, somehow I thought it might be 'On the Waterfront', which I hadn't seen in many many years, but it wasn't...

I saw a film in the early to mid 1950s and one scene is indelibly imbedded in my mind. Takes place, I believe, on a pier, and the villain falls, or is pushed, onto a pitchfork/trident type thing. He writhes, then dies. I was seven or eight years old when I saw it, and that seemed like the very most horrible way to die.

The baddie may have been Lee J. Cobb (or someone like him). I seem to recall the scene being in color, but that may be just my overactive imagination. I don't think there was much blood in it.

Anyone have ANY idea what this flick might have been? It's a sequence that's remained firmly ensconced in my mind for decades. Thanks, in advance, for any assistance.

User avatar
antnield
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: Identify This Movie

#761 Post by antnield » Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:58 am

Gorilla at Large (1954) features Lee J. Cobb and death by impalement so that's a possibility.

User avatar
whipsilk
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:54 am
Location: Wilmington, DE

Re: Identify This Movie

#762 Post by whipsilk » Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:27 am

antnield wrote:Gorilla at Large (1954) features Lee J. Cobb and death by impalement so that's a possibility.
Thanks, antnield, I'll bet that was it. I couldn't really imagine my parents taking an eight-year-old to 'On the Waterfront', but a 3-D ape movie (with a mystery component for them)? - yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Thanks so much - I'll be getting the Midnite Movie double bill, of which GaL is the feature presentation, but the companion is redeemed (bad as it may be) by having a young Terence Stamp (plus it's one I've never seen).

User avatar
cocaine socialist
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:18 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#763 Post by cocaine socialist » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:11 pm

Image

I saw this labeled as INFAMOUS, 1982 but can't find anything.

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#764 Post by Gregory » Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:18 pm


Gus
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:04 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#765 Post by Gus » Mon May 13, 2013 9:58 am

Hello!

Anbody now what movie they have used for this music video? i'm guessing something from Italy, early to mid 60's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xB4T3zGJfk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks in advance
Gustav

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#766 Post by domino harvey » Mon May 13, 2013 11:58 am

Io la conoscevo bene

User avatar
ShellOilJunior
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#767 Post by ShellOilJunior » Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:12 pm

Saw part of this film on TV as a kid and always wondered the name of it:

Movie from the 60's or 70's
Features at least two black college basketball players from USC
Part of the plot is they are not happy with their lack of playing time

User avatar
gcgiles1dollarbin
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:38 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#768 Post by gcgiles1dollarbin » Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:25 pm

Could it be Final Shot: The Hank Gathers Story? I realize this is a little late, but along with Bo Kimble, he left after his freshman year at USC to play at Loyola Marymount after they had their scholarships revoked.

User avatar
ShellOilJunior
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#769 Post by ShellOilJunior » Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:26 am

I think you're correct. The funny thing is it was on TV nearly 20 years ago and I watched it for maybe 10 minutes and wondered what the name of it was - good find!

duck duck
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#770 Post by duck duck » Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:14 am

Ok, 80's-90's American film a guy has amnesia and only remembers there is an assassination plot. I saw part of it on Encore a few years ago and keep forgetting to look it up and now I've forgotten the title. Thanks....

User avatar
Emak-Bakia
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:48 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#771 Post by Emak-Bakia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:34 am

Alright, I’ve got one that’s really starting to drive me crazy. I think this is actually from a 1950s game show or possible news program, but I very well could be wrong. I don’t remember the details too well, but the host of the show brought together a man who lived in Japan during the WW2 nuclear bombings and one of the pilots who dropped the bomb! It was really unbelievable, but I seem to recall the Japanese man being quite calm and forgiving. I keep thinking the setup was something like “What’s My Line,” with the two parties not allowed to see each other until the final reveal. I’ve been Googling all morning and asking around in a desperate search to figure out what this is from, but everyone keeps responding as if I made the whole thing up. Now I’m starting to wonder if I dreamed it. I’d be grateful for any help.

User avatar
warren oates
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:16 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#772 Post by warren oates » Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:42 am

It's an episode of "This is Your Life" from 1955 featuring captain Robert A. Lewis and Kiyoshi Tanimoto. A quick Google search will find you more than one link to the video.

User avatar
Emak-Bakia
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:48 am

Re: Identify This Movie

#773 Post by Emak-Bakia » Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:50 am

Thanks so much! And now I can sleep tonight!

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: Identify This Movie

#774 Post by Gregory » Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:28 pm

That is one of the most unbelievable episodes of television I know of. I read about it pre-Internet in John Hersey's amazing account of Tanimoto's life at the end of his book Hiroshima but had never thought to look for it since then. Here's an excerpt about the program:
SpoilerShow
Next came the shocker. In walked a tall, fattish American man, whom Edwards introduced as Captain Robert Lewis, copilot of the Enola Gay on the Hiroshima mission. In a shaky voice, Lewis told about the flight. Tanimoto sat there with a face of wood. At one point, Lewis broke off, closed his eyes, and rubbed his forehead, and forty million watchers across the land must have thought he was crying. (He was not. He has been drinking. Years later, Marvin Green told a young journalist named Rodney Barker, who was writing a book on the Maidens, that Lewis had panicked the show people by failing to turn up that afternoon for the rehearsal of all the participants except Tanimoto. It seemed that he had expected to be given a fat check for appearing on the show, and when he learned that he would not, he had gone out bar crawling. Green said he had found the copilot in time to get a cup of coffee in him before the show. )

Edwards: "Did you write something in your log at that time?"

Lewis: "I wrote down the words, 'My God, what have we done?'"

After that, Chisa Tanimoto trotted onstage with clipped steps, because she was wearing what she never wore at home—a kimono. In Hiroshima, she had been given two days to uproot herself—and the four children she and her husband now had—and get to Los Angeles. There they had all been incarcerated in a hotel, kept strictly away from their husband and father. For the first time on the show, Tanimoto's expression changed—to surprise; he seemed to have become a stranger to pleasure. Next, two of the Maidens, Toyoko Minowa and Tadako Emori, were presented in silhouette behind a translucent screen, and Edwards made a pitch to the audience for money for the Maidens' operations. And, finally, the four Tanimoto children—daughter Koko, who had been an infant in the bombing, now ten; son Ken, seven; daughter Jun, four; and son Shin, two—came running out into their father's arms.

***

INCOMING TELEGRAM:
CONFIDENTIAL
FROM: TOKYO
TO: SECRETARY OF STATE
MAY 12, 1955

EMBASSY-USIS SHARE WASHINGTON CONCERN LEST HIROSHIMA GIRLS PROJECT GENERATE UNFAVORABLE PUBLICITY. ...

TANIMOTO IS LOOKED UPON HERE AS SOMETHING OF A PUBLICITY SEEKER. MAY WELL TRY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF TRIP TO RAISE FUNDS FOR HIROSHIMA MEMORIAL PEACE CENTER, HIS PET PROJECT. DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS RED OR RED-SYMPATHIZER, BUT HE CAN EASILY BECOME SOURCE OF MISCHIEVOUS PUBLICITY

By diplomatic pouch:
SECRET

The Reverend Tanimoto is pictured as one who appears to be anti-Communist and probably sincere in his efforts to assist the girls. ... However, in his desire to enhance his own prestige and importance he might ignorantly, innocently, or purposefully lend himself to or pursue a leftist line. ...

RALPH J. BLAKE
AMERICAN CONSUL GENERAL, KOBE

UPON getting back East after the show, Robert Lewis, who had resigned from the Air Force and was working as personnel manager of Henry Heide, candy makers, in New York, was called to the Pentagon and given a heavy chewing out by the Defense Department.

User avatar
Ibnezra
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:54 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Identify This Movie

#775 Post by Ibnezra » Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:03 pm

Hello, I'm new to the forum, but I use to post obsessively on an older Criterion forum on a website that sold Criterion DVDs (and only Criterions) at discount prices. The fellow that owned the business suffered some kind of hardship and a once great business went the way of the dodo. Point being: there may be other posters who frequented that long gone environ, and if so- my hat's off to you.

The movie I'm curious about was a Japanese horror movie (I believe) with the same production values and vintage as "Ultraman", "Space Giants", and the original slew of Godzilla flicks (the ones in color). I think it begins in a cave with some tomb robbers. The cave is infested with scorpions which they kill with revolvers before finding a cursed black egg or egg sculpture, the theft of which prompts the appearance of a monster. It's all a little muddled as I was probably three when I saw it.

The other film is about a space station that sends explorers out onto some terrestrial body. One of the explorers gets some slime on his suit. When his space suit goes to decontamination, the decontamination process incubates the foreign material and bingo, a rampaging (well, waddling) alien terrorizes the space craft from deck to deck and corridor to corridor for the remainer of the picture.

Post Reply