It is currently Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:54 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:22 pm 

Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 1:10 pm
It was a very, very nice scan and restoration job, yes.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:55 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:14 am
EddieLarkin wrote:
I've every confidence that the older restoration was done to the highest standards of the time, but I'd say an almost 10 year difference in scanning/restoration technology plays a bigger part than even the fact this new restoration is twice the resolution. Enjoy these comparisons:

New, Old
New, Old
New, Old

The old transfer looks positively video in comparison. Now if only Second Sight can see to it to not totally screw up the encoding like they did with Re-Animator.

Color me impressed. It looks great, downright beautiful to look at but doesn't lose any sort of gritty look in the process. I don't know how to explain it exactly but the new transfer just looks appropriate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:34 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:04 am
David M. wrote:
Quote:
The old transfer looks positively video in comparison. Now if only Second Sight can see to it to not totally screw up the encoding
They won't. We made sure of it ;)

In fact I think you will be very pleasantly surprised when you compare the encoding to the US release. (That could be seen a contentious thing for me to write, but it's scientifically verifiable).

Damn, I wish I'd known you were working on this release before I bought the Dark Sky Films edition.

I may just have to return it once it arrives in the mail.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am
The word is that the U.S. disc features a few errors:

1. On the soundtrack, at the end of the film when Sally jumps into the back of the truck and starts to shout at the driver to go, some of her scream afterwards is missing. This is apparently the case on all tracks, including the mono, suggesting it may be a downmix. Compare 1:21:20-1:21:27 on the older Blu-ray and 1:21:18-1:21:25 on the new.

2. The opening montage with the camera flashes is missing one of its fades at 00:01:46, which is now a freeze and a cut instead

3. There's also apparently some missing sound effects before Pam falls into the bone room, again and all tracks, though I don't know what exactly.

Regarding the mono track at least, it'd be nice if the Second Sight disc could correct these or just port over the lossy mono track from the earlier Blu-ray.

I've reviewed the opening on the older Blu-ray and it is definitely nothing but fades, so presumably this is a mistake, though fixing it might not be appropriate since this was supervised by Hooper (and fixing it digitally may cause other unwanted effects?). A user on HTF posits that they will have gone back to the A/B rolls for this remaster, and since all fades and dissolves would have needed to be redone digitally, this is obviously one they've missed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:12 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:45 am
It wouldn't be a brand-spanking-new TEXAS release without some requisite fuck-ups to sour things for folks who care. I still cherish my Dark Sky DVD special edition with the missing sound effects. Glad to see Dark Sky are continuing the tradition on a new format in this new decade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:15 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:14 am
EddieLarkin wrote:
The word is that the U.S. disc features a few errors:

*snip*

Oh crap. I guess I should hang onto my Dark Sky DVD, should I?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:42 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
If those minor things no one would notice bother you, sure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:51 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:14 am
Thinking about it; eh, I doubt they'll bother me anyway. It's still the same movie and if it's still effective, it's not a failure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:42 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am
domino harvey wrote:
If those minor things no one would notice bother you, sure

Well, I guess this goes with the missing 6 seconds of ZFE on the 1st pressing of Arrow's BD.
While this is extremely minor, shouldnt sound and image integrity and completeness be the 1st criteria to evaluate a video release ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:39 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:45 am
'No-one will notice' them, except for fans familiar with the movie who have read the threads, who will keep an eye out for the glitches on first pass, and who will spot them on every viewing thereafter. Seems a shame really. Are Second Sight going to be using this glitchy, fucked-up transfer as well or is there still time to correct things before a defective version of the film is permanently set in stone?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:14 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:48 am
"First, do no harm" should be the first principle in restoration and presentation, and it's certainly a valid criticism of this release if it doesn't comply with that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:05 am 

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:45 am
Given past form Dark Sky are well on schedule to release a completely glitch-free edition in 4K format around 2018 or so, right after the current stuffed version has been sitting on our shelves annoying us for half a decade or so. I really shouldn't be so hard on them - it's only the second time they've released a premium remaster of this iconic film with various key, familiar sound effects stripped right out of the movie. I'm sure in the future after the third or fourth time this happens they'll scratch their chins a bit and have a big group discussion about possibly taking more care when they release the movie a fifth and sixth time.

The events of this day have lead to the discovery of one of the most bizarre crimes in the annals of American history - THE TEXAS CHAINSAW FUCKED-UP DISC MASSACRE!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:16 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:31 pm
I'm beginning to think these companies don't want us to be satisfied.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:56 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am
Second Sight wrote:
We have had several enquiries regarding our release of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. We can confirm that the new restoration included the replacing of a fade to black with a hard cut to black in the opening camera flash sequence. This was in fact a change made during the restoration process in conjunction with Tobe Hooper. While we of course respect this decision we have decided, with approval, to include the fade in our release to adhere to the original vision.
With regard to the audio some very minor adjustments were made to some sound effects on the new mixes. Again this was done in conjunction with Tobe Hooper. This does not affect the dialogue track. We will also include the original mono track with no adjustments.
Excellent news! They're implying though that the removal of the fade in the restoration was done with Hooper's knowledge and approval, which sounds like lip service to me (not that that's a problem or anything).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am
Second Sight blu ray of 40th anniversary restoration one looks a bit better than US release.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection