Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peebles)

Discussions of specific films and franchises.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peebles)

#1 Post by knives » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:09 am

Between the US and BFI disc which is the better?

User avatar
Graham
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:50 pm
Location: London

Re: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peeb

#2 Post by Graham » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:53 am

Without checking, the BFI disc is probably cut.

User avatar
antnield
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England

Re: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peeb

#3 Post by antnield » Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:04 am

Yes, the Child Protection Act meant cuts of one minute and 15 seconds to the opening sequence. Van Peebles approved the cuts, which involved obscuring any sensitive material with a black screen. The audio remains intact.

The BFI disc is also an NTSC-PAL conversion resulting in the expected ghosting issues, etc. However, it does also contain an eight-page booklet (two reprints and newly commissioned introduction by Kodwo Eshun) plus the bizarre featurette 'The Real Deal (What It Is...)' in which we see MVP take a dump, recreate the opening sequence with his 'secretary' and inform us how he tried to get compensation from the Director's Guild of American after catching gonorrhoea during the shoot!

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peeb

#4 Post by knives » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:14 pm

That sounds amazing and I might when I have free money have to get the BFI anyway, but it sounds like American is the way to go. Thanks.

User avatar
Wu.Qinghua
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:31 pm

Re: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971, Melvin van Peeb

#5 Post by Wu.Qinghua » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

As long as you wouldn't need the hoh subtitles the BFI provides; I assume most non-native speakers would prefer the British edition because of them and in spite of the censored sequence in the beginning.

Post Reply