It is currently Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:39 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:47 am
Location: Cambridge, England
Michael Kerpan wrote:
Jones was okay -- but I missed Zeppo. ;~}

And, as Groucho said, if you're going to make a film at the opera, at least have someone in it who can sing.


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:35 pm 

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Round Lake, Illinois USA
TCM-HD did broadcast "Animal Crackers" and "Duck Soup" recently and they did use a cleaned up print...much better then the ones used in the box set released a few years ago. The early Marx Bros movies released on dvd had very poor prints of the film so i think the new releases will have better looking copy of the films.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:58 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:28 am
From what I've read, Horse Feathers has about thirty minutes or so cut out thanks to the Hayes Office, and an uncut print has yet to be found.
I'm contemplating whether or not I should still grab the DVD. I mean, does the film still work? Pardon my ignorance. ^^;


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:36 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
Kaseykockroach wrote:
From what I've read, Horse Feathers has about thirty minutes or so cut out thanks to the Hayes Office, and an uncut print has yet to be found.
I'm contemplating whether or not I should still grab the DVD. I mean, does the film still work? Pardon my ignorance. ^^;

There's no way 30 minutes were cut from the film. 30 seconds may be closer to the truth. There's a hilarious scene taking place in Thelma Todd's home that has footage missing; this scene can make for frustrating viewing, but everything else in the film plays very well. The only change I'm aware of is that the brothers were not allowed to burn down the college at the film's end as originally scripted. The substitute ending is not nearly as strong of an idea, but still amusing in its own way.

On the strength of its comic timing (Norman McLeod was the perfect director for the Marx Brothers in my opinion) and performances, HORSE FEATHERS remains my favorite Marx film.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:47 am
Location: Cambridge, England
You're right, there's about 30 seconds missing and a line that was considered obscene by the Hays office.
I would choose any of the Paramount films as my favourite (except maybe "Cocoanuts"), but "Animal Crackers" if you put a gun to my head.
Even late in life, Groucho sometimes signed correspondence "Jeffrey T. Spalding"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:54 am 

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:31 am
Location: Somerset, England
While I don't know the exact timing of the cuts, Glenn Mitchell's entry for Horse Feathers in his Marx Brothers Encyclopedia suggests more like several minutes missing: "its present version... has undergone considerable multilation - not to mention outright censorship - since initial release". He mentions "a lost Harpo gag, in which he makes dogcatching easy by planting fake lamp-posts" (different sizes for various breeds), also the deletion of much of Harpo's material with Thelma Todd, which he describes in detail.
Glenn Mitchell wrote:
It is believed that some of the cuts were made deliberately, possibly for television or for a theatrical reissue conforming to the restrictive Hays Code; there is in addition reason to suspect partial loss of the original negative, for much of the abridged section is obviously duped from a battered old print.... clipping out sections of dialogue.... An at least reasonably complete print was still circulating in the UK during the 1950s on the Classic cinema chain. It was at such a screening that British writer David Parlett took extensive notes, providing a vivid account of what has since been lost.

Although Mitchell wrote this in 1996, I don't think a longer print has surfaced since then.

By the way, anyone who likes the Marx Brothers Paramounts might well enjoy the concurrent (mostly pre-Code) RKO two-reelers of Clark & McCullough. Bobby Clark - with painted-on spectacles instead of moustache - is very close to Groucho's persona and their best ones have (for me) a similar type of inspired lunacy. Unfortunately, there don't seem to be any official releases (though some are on YouTube and available on DVD-R from minor US outlets). I still rely on my 1980s recordings of 6.40am broadcasts on BBC One!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
Jonathan S wrote:
...He mentions "a lost Harpo gag, in which he makes dogcatching easy by planting fake lamp-posts" (different sizes for various breeds)...

Shouldn't this be "fake fire hydrants"? That seems like the proper choice for the gag; lamp-posts seem like they would be too unweildly, even for Harpo!

Thanks for sharing this info. I believe the censored line and Harpo's antics with Todd all come during the scene where the brothers converge on her campus residence; that's the one scene really damaged by the cutting. While other material may be missing, I think the film plays quite well in its current form and, in response to "Kaseykockroach", it still works despite those cuts. As to the timing of the cuts, at 68 min. HORSE FEATHERS is comparable to the running times of MONKEY BUSINESS (77 min.) and DUCK SOUP (68 min.) so while I can imagine up to 10 minutes may be missing, 30 minutes sounds like an exaggeration.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:16 am 

Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:31 am
Location: Somerset, England
Roger Ryan wrote:
Jonathan S wrote:
...He mentions "a lost Harpo gag, in which he makes dogcatching easy by planting fake lamp-posts" (different sizes for various breeds)...

Shouldn't this be "fake fire hydrants"? That seems like the proper choice for the gag; lamp-posts seem like they would be too unweildly, even for Harpo!

I suspect you're right, though I'm quoting verbatim. In the UK fire hydrants are underground, so perhaps Mitchell has inadvertently anglicised the gag! Unless Horse Feathers actually showed the dogs urinating (a la Mon oncle), I'm actually quite surprised the scene would be censored even after the Code. I recall fire hydrant gags in Pluto cartoons (including a great one where the hydrant squirts him!) Different rules for live-action perhaps...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:58 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
From the New York Times summer preview that also reveals some Criterion August releases:
Quote:
On June 7 the Marx Brothers’ campaign to destroy any semblance of sanity of order reaches Blu-ray, as their early comedies — “The Cocoanuts,” “Animal Crackers,” “Duck Soup,” “Monkey Business” and “Horse Feathers” — are released.

That's the same date the DVD reissues were announced though and I haven't seen anything about them coming out on Blu-ray anywhere else, so I wonder if that's a typo. Has the New York Times ever been right before?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO
swo17 wrote:
That's the same date the DVD reissues were announced though and I haven't seen anything about them coming out on Blu-ray anywhere else, so I wonder if that's a typo. Has the New York Times ever been right before?

The Old Gray Lady ain't what she used to be. It's almost certainly another NYT error.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:12 pm
Jeff wrote:
The Old Gray Lady ain't what she used to be. It's almost certainly another NYT error.

That's what happens when you lay off a number of copy editors and outsource their jobs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Sun May 01, 2011 8:11 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
It better be right, I'd love to see those early Marx Brothers in HD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:50 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, England
Can't honestly see the point, unless they've found pristine new prints and a HORSE FEATHERS that hasn't had the shears taken to it. The scene in Thelma Todd's apartment gives me a headache, so choppy is it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 8:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am
DVD re-issues are superfluous. These had better be in HD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 8:25 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:47 am
Location: Cambridge, England
ShellOilJunior wrote:
DVD re-issues are superfluous. These had better be in HD.

..or what?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 9:38 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am
tojoed wrote:
ShellOilJunior wrote:
DVD re-issues are superfluous. These had better be in HD.

..or what?

Or this means war!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 10:16 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:17 am
Robert Harris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 10:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, England
Now, the Universal horrors, I can see the point of and would be sorely tempted by. The restorations put out in recent years on their various Legacy editions (DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY, THE WOLF MAN) would look spiffy in HD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 3:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
reaky wrote:
Now, the Universal horrors, I can see the point of and would be sorely tempted by. The restorations put out in recent years on their various Legacy editions (DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY, THE WOLF MAN) would look spiffy in HD.

I'm sure you'll have the chance to buy these five or six times on BluRay over the next ten years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 6:12 pm 

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:55 am
Oh I'm certain we'll get plenty of opportunities. To be fair though, if they all look as good as the Netflix streaming HD of WEREWOLF OF LONDON and ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN from last July and October then I'll be glad to pony up at least once.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:21 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
DVDTalk reviews the rerelease of Cocoanuts which he isn't sure, but says most likely is the same transfer and disc as the 2004 release.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:37 pm 

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: Round Lake, Illinois USA
I did record "Animal Crackers" when it was shown on TCM-HD and it was a cleaner print than the 2004 dvd release which i have...the same thing when i saw "Duck Soup" on TCM..they had a better print than the dvd release...so i hope the new releases are made from a better source. I hope to see more reviews when they come out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:37 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm
zedz wrote:
reaky wrote:
Now, the Universal horrors, I can see the point of and would be sorely tempted by. The restorations put out in recent years on their various Legacy editions (DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY, THE WOLF MAN) would look spiffy in HD.
I'm sure you'll have the chance to buy these five or six times on BluRay over the next ten years.
Are you sure you're sure? What are they waiting for? Blu-ray has been around for five years now and we haven't even seen the first releases of a lot of older films like these that are held by the big studios and were huge money-spinners on earlier formats.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city
What I hear repeatedly, even occasionally from self-proclaimed cinephiles, is that older films (say, anything prior to 1970) could not possibly have been "shot in HD" so the Blu-ray format will not offer any significant improvement over the existing DVDs. The sales numbers also prove that classic films (especially ones produced prior to 1960) do not sell nearly as well on Blu-ray as more recent films. Add to this the fact that the Marx Brothers' Paramount films are in such rough shape, and would require extensive restoration work, seems to be a nail in the coffin for the Marxes in HD. I'm hope I'm wrong.

EDIT: Okay, I just realized that the Blu-ray discussion had shifted to Universal Horror films and was not really about the Marx Brothers after all. My guess is that Universal's classic horror series would be a more likely candidate for Blu-ray upgrade than the Marx Brothers films, but by no means should we consider that a certainty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Marx Brothers
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
Gregory wrote:
zedz wrote:
reaky wrote:
Now, the Universal horrors, I can see the point of and would be sorely tempted by. The restorations put out in recent years on their various Legacy editions (DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY, THE WOLF MAN) would look spiffy in HD.
I'm sure you'll have the chance to buy these five or six times on BluRay over the next ten years.
Are you sure you're sure? What are they waiting for? Blu-ray has been around for five years now and we haven't even seen the first releases of a lot of older films like these that are held by the big studios and were huge money-spinners on earlier formats.

I'm pretty sure I'm sure I'm sure. Unless the entire format goes south (which is entirely possible), I bet we'll see several milkings of those particular titles before we see any of Universal's rarer / more interesting black and white holdings make Blu.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection