The Slayer

Discuss DVDs and Blu-rays released from Arrow and the films on them.

Moderator: MichaelB

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

The Slayer

#1 Post by domino harvey » Fri May 12, 2017 10:40 am

Image

IS IT A NIGHTMARE? OR IS IT… THE SLAYER?

One of the most sought-after titles for slasher fans everywhere, The Slayer finally rises from the ashes of obscurity in a brand new 4K transfer courtesy of Arrow Video.

Two young couples set off to a secluded island for what promises to be a restful retreat. But the peace is short-lived: as a storm batters the island, troubled artist Kay begins to sense that a malevolent presence is here with them, stalking them at every turn. Is she losing her mind, or are her childhood nightmares of a demonic assailant coming to terrifying life?

Previously only available on home video in truncated or full screen versions, The Slayer – whose nightmares-seeping-into-reality theme predates a certain Wes Craven classic by several years – comes lovingly restored from the original negative in a stunning transfer that will be a revelation to fans both old and new.

CONTENTS
  • Brand new restoration from a 4K scan of the original negative
  • High Definition Blu-ray (1080p) and Standard Definition DVD presentations
  • Original Uncompressed Mono Audio
  • Optional English subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing
  • Brand new interviews with cast and crew
  • Original Theatrical Trailer
  • Reversible sleeve featuring original and newly commissioned artwork by Justin Osbourn
FIRST PRESSING ONLY: Collector s booklet featuring new writing on the film by Lee Gambin

User avatar
Banasa
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:35 am

Re: The Slayer

#2 Post by Banasa » Fri May 12, 2017 1:44 pm

Seems like former Arrow contributor, the K-pop and horror loving Calum Waddell is not too happy with Arrow grabbing this film and Don't Torture a Duckling. Seems to be taking a loss as a win stating "they lost more from losing me than they gained I think!"

User avatar
Mr Sausage
Not PETA approved
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Slayer

#3 Post by Mr Sausage » Fri May 12, 2017 2:36 pm

What's his gripe exactly?

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Slayer

#4 Post by tenia » Fri May 12, 2017 5:37 pm

I suppose maybe 88 Films was after it.
Or it's just a random reason to keep on bashing Arrow.
Both are similarly plausible, actually.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Slayer

#5 Post by colinr0380 » Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:49 am

Mondo Digital review - I'm especially glad that there is a composer interview followed by score highlights on a separate audio track.

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Slayer

#6 Post by colinr0380 » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:55 am

I really liked this, but its a very slow burn, and one of those films where everything has inevitably been pre-spoilt in its trailer (it doesn't help that its most strikingly monstrous image is its key selling point! You can't have an image like that and not expect it to be used in the marketing, or on the cover!). Its the kind of film where I could understand people being bored for the majority of its mid-section of people wandering around the landscape calling out for long dead friends (only to be met with the cry of loons in response), but if you enjoy scenes of characters exploring sandy beaches, lush jungles, dilapidated buildings and so on, this is almost the perfect film!

I can see what is meant by calling this a kind of 'arthouse slasher'. Its got all of the tropes of the slasher film - a group of friends go to an isolated house, have sex, get stalked and killed off one by one - but its got a real off-kilter sense of otherworldliness about it throughout in the focus on the main character who may or may not be dreaming, but who at the very least has premonitions about everything about to happen. Even of the final monstrous appearance in the opening dream sequence, which neatly bookends the less fantastical mid-section, as the cycle ends and the ambiguous dream-world(?) collapses into blunt terror. Very Lynchian! While watching I ended up thinking about lots of disparate films that this could positively be compared to: the dreamy, perpetually startled main character is a bit like the main character of Eleanor in the 1963 version of The Haunting (and similarly the characters both seem to prefer exploring their environment than being with other people); the whole island setting and relationships falling apart under the seeming influence of one character's mental trauma is a bit like Through A Glass Darkly (though one in which the molesting spider God at the end is explicitly visualised); and the whole sequence of wandering the, beautifully windswept and rugged, island after the first character disappears without trace is very L'Avventura-esque!

But I also don't want to push that aspect too much, as this is still very much a slasher film too, defined by its murder sequences. Just as fruitful a comparison could be made to that recent 2013 Evil Dead remake - this feels tonally very much like that early section of a group of people coming together to 'help' a troubled member of their group get through their issues, without realising that its going to overwhelm all of them too. And in its final moment it pulls out a twist very much like
SpoilerShow
Triangle's, where eveything is reset. But reset decades back to the traumatic childhood event as recounted in the story earlier in the film, of Kay being presented with the cat as a present that she would then go on to kill by locking into a freezer. There's the horror there of being about to go through the entire cycle all over again, but I also like that maybe there's the potential (as in Triangle) of a karmic get-out clause too - that maybe by at one time not killing the Black Cat, the entire cycle of guilt could be brought to an end. Maybe.

Its all beautifully (though maybe frustratingly for many) ambiguous and open ended in its answers to the mystery. Is the monster really killing people, or is that just a visualisation for Kay, and Kay is the one murdering her brother and sister-in-law whenever she falls asleep? (It does make me think a great premise for a horror film would be a Box-like one that people have only ever died when someone, somewhere goes to sleep! By recharging your batteries, has every single person in the world has been draining the life essence of someone else!) Or could it have simply been the light aircraft pilot/creepy handman (in the tradition of Friday the 13th's doom proclaiming character) all along?

There's an amazing moment where Brooke in her murder scene, after having seen the pitchfork appearing out of the shadows with just a stunned reaction, suddenly starts screaming in abject terror. Has she seen the monster that Kay, and the audience, will see at the end of the film? Or is it the reaction of seeing someone she knows approaching her with homicidal madness in their eyes? Which is the more terrifying? We'll never know, and its probably right that we don't.

I love that ending too. The monster is absolutely fantastic and a horrific punchline, but I also particularly like the build up to that, where after shooting the handyman with the flare gun and escaping upstairs whilst his body and the house catches fire, as Kay struggles with the front door the red glow from the flames downstairs lights up the stairwell as if its the portal down to Hell itself! It makes the desperation to escape not just literal but beautifully metaphorical too, as Kay doesn't want to be pulled down into the flames. Then she opens the front door to be confronted literally by a monstrous demon (an expression of her repressed homicidal side made flesh) that traps her inside that inferno.

Like Eleanor in The Haunting (or Carnival of Souls, or later on the family in Lucio Fulci's The House By The Cemetery), you can never leave, just join the other ghosts as your past catches up to you and both aspects of the self merge together in a blunt full stop.
Its a fantastic film about guilt and mental breakdown, and the sense of powerlessness those feelings can bring. It also looks beautiful with its storm lashed landscapes and well composed imagery. It is why that extremely drawn out mid-section which I can understand others perhaps finding boring really works for me - its a lot of wandering around, but the imagery is so beautiful that I could have watched more of it! (A bit Carnival of Souls-like, though a little less focused and more meandering) I also like the way that after the first disappearance Kay sort of comes to terms with her boyfriend being dead while her brother and his girl start to get more concerned as night falls, then the next day, then the next without him turning up. There's a sense of a longeur there that makes the disappearance without a quick resolution a bit more disturbing than something like the logistical nightmare of a Friday the 13th film where a dozen teenagers have to all be murdered within the timeframe of a single night. That's also what creates an Antonioni-like sense of troubling absence to that section of the film too. Even that light aircraft journey beyond the clouds to the island could be a bit Antonioni-like, though that might be pushing it! It also helps that the characters here are in their 30s or 40s rather than teenagers.

As well as beautiful shots of the sea and the landscape, there are also some tremendously impressive mirror shots throughout the film. For example the early one of the brother and his girl framed between two mirrors on either wall of their bathroom, facing away from each other in the room but carrying out a conversation through their mirrored reflections. All of that mirror imagery ties in well with Kay's troubled mental state (thankfully its relatively understated too, never someone seeing themselves as a demon in a mirror or anything like that, more that someone is being confronted by an image of themselves and looking right through it, or past it) and the sense that it is her guilty side, her unexpressed dream state that is where this scenario is playing out in.

Its a really nice little self-enclosed jewel of a film. I also liked that the main theme of the film seems very similar to one of the tracks of the Alien score!

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Slayer

#7 Post by domino harvey » Sun May 26, 2019 11:06 pm

Well, that is a noble defense, but I took the ending to literally be
SpoilerShow
a revelation that the whole movie was a dream, but then the things in the dream are now happening... only, like, starting from 30 years ago? BOOOOOOO, GET OFF THE STAGE, MOVIE
Like so many slashers, the twist doesn't really make sense, but neither does anything else here. I didn't care about the protagonist or her predicament (and unlike Colin, I don't think there is much ambiguity as to who is responsible), because everything about it is the usual business painted with a dour brush, and any good will I had was drained pretty early on. As for the pacing/subject matter being apart from other slashers, I agree, but I think it's just evidence that it belongs more to the tradition of 70s serious horror movies (and with a 1982 release date, this is still on the cusp of the transition), and frankly I don't like those any more than 80s slashers! It does however star the most convincing Sigourney Weaver lookalike imaginable, so I guess that is a metric of differentiation

Post Reply