The Philadelphia Story

Discuss North American DVDs and Blu-rays or other DVD and Blu-ray-related topics.
Message
Author
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

#26 Post by Gregory » Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:16 pm

Just in case there was any confusion, I don't consider her an "icy socialite," as that reviewer refers to her. However, I think that was how the role was intended, within the mainstream values of the era. I'm sure many people would still see her that way.

User avatar
lubitsch
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:20 pm

#27 Post by lubitsch » Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:11 am

First let's please drop the "Cukor is not mysoginistic stuff". This is a film made after a play written by Barry and written by Donald Ogden Stewart. That's what we are talking about primarily and Cukor/Hepburn at the sausage factory MGM have limited opportunities to undermine what's in the script.

The script itself is clearly following one line. Every caracter trashes Hepburn at least once about her icy caracter, not only the men, but also the mother and her little sister. Hepburn finally recognizes the wrong way of her life, loosens up and transformed into a submissive woman accepts gladly men as drinking, philandering swine they are. Cary Grant finally tells her exactly to what to tell the guests and she follows him blindly.

There are films which are multi layered, PS does not belong there, you don't expect from a MGM movie subversive tendencies, do you? Just look at the scenes how they are played when the other people attack Hepburn, how she freezes and even cries when her father attacks her brutally and how sweet the reconciliation with him is after she has learned about her wrong way. The only person who does not attack her before her transformation is her worthless fiancee. And then there's Ruth Hussey in the background. She's stronger than Stewart allright, but she plays the female role of enduring the unfaithfullness Stewart's with Hepburn and finally welcomes him back.

I think this outdated rubbish is a good example of a film which gets enshrined by TV, Video and DVD as an immortal classic through sheer repetition. It's a classic example of the rigid, uncreative and dull efforts MGM put out for years with its reactionary attitudes. It speaks volumes about Cukor that he could blossom there while great directors avoided MGM like hell.

A nice quote for the end: "Shaw exposes the condition of women, Barrie exalts the virtue of ladies, Maugham exhibits the vices of females, Barry exploits the talents of actresses"

rgross
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Kansas City

#28 Post by rgross » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:51 am

The Philadelphia story has always seemed to me to have a feeling of finally taming the screwball heroine before she moved on to Film Noir and became VERY menacing.

Compare Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant's relationship in Bringing Up Baby, the film I always think about when watching Philadelphia Story.

Hepburn transformed Grant in Bringing Up Baby before submitting to her transformation by him in Philadelphia Story a couple years later.

Bring on the 40's and 50's.

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#29 Post by Michael » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:50 am

The script itself is clearly following one line. Every caracter trashes Hepburn at least once about her icy caracter, not only the men, but also the mother and her little sister. Hepburn finally recognizes the wrong way of her life, loosens up and transformed into a submissive woman accepts gladly men as drinking, philandering swine they are. Cary Grant finally tells her exactly to what to tell the guests and she follows him blindly.
I think we keep forgetting the little girl who is very important to the story. She may "trash" Hepburn only because she wants Hepburn to be back with Dexter. She's the only one who really believes that Hepburn and Dexter are made for each other. And I do too. Hepburn may appear to loosen up and turn into a submissive woman but I think she does that to get what she wants .. and that's Dexter even though she denies him almost throughout the film. And now about Dexter completing Hepburn's sentence as she announces to her wedding guests in the end, my partner and I do that to each other from now and then. I think it's a sweet metaphor of those two completing each other. I'd be scared shit if I stood in Hepburn's shoes making that kind of announcement. But Dexter steps in, saving her day. And his as well. In my opinion, it has nothing to do with sexism. Hepburn and Dexter could be both men and it still works just as same.

I really need to revisit this film. Just waiting for my DVD to arrive.

Matt, was that you who wrote of this film with much love and joy some time ago - the best Hollywoof film or something? I faintly remember.

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

#30 Post by Matt » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:15 pm

Michael wrote:Matt, was that you who wrote of this film with much love and joy some time ago
Yeah, but I'm trying to avoid this particular discussion.

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#31 Post by Michael » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:47 pm

I wrote:
Hepburn may appear to loosen up and turn into a submissive woman but I think she does that to get what she wants .. and that's Dexter even though she denies him almost throughout the film.
Let me clarify this. One of Hepburn's lines in the film: Now I know that what I needed was to submit and be a real woman. I'm sure this line makes some viewers going "ick". I don't see Hepburn as a woman who submits to anything, let alone men. She's a woman who hides her human frailty behind a veneer of perfection. Her willigness to explore herself, even it mean showing signs of weakness, is a strength far greater than her initial caustic wit and intelligence.

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#32 Post by Michael » Fri Oct 13, 2006 1:38 pm

The DVD finally arrived. My partner and I watched it last night. It was first time for him and he summed up in a few words: "the key to achieving happiness and true love is getting very drunk". I'm not sure if he liked it or not but I will ask him later. To me, PS is still as magnificent as I remember seeing it years ago. How gorgeous Kate looked. I paid close attention to Kate's character's development. In the beginning she seems to be selfish - so full of herself. She has too much pride to admit or recognize her weaknesses but all that is changed by the end as the "ice maiden" slowly melts into what she's finally calls herself a "human being". She gets to where Dexter got to before he re-enters her life. Dexter was a drunk before they split up as the stunning opening scene shows. But it's obvious that Dexter matures somehow during the split and Kate does the same during the film.

Tonight we will be watching Bringing Up Baby.. first time for both of us.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

#33 Post by zedz » Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:03 pm

Michael wrote:Tonight we will be watching Bringing Up Baby.. first time for both of us.
Lucky guys! I'd love to hear what you think of it (probably my favourite sound comedy).

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#34 Post by Michael » Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:01 pm

Well, my partner Pedro and I have opposite opinions of Philadelphia Story and Bringing Up Baby. He adored Baby, calling it a brilliantly energetic, exquisite masterpiece that holds up shockingly well today. I thought it was cute and silly. The film would be so blah without Kate and Cary whose chemistry together really made the film glitter. Midway through the film, Pedro (not knowing much about Kate) asked me if she was lesbian in real life. :)

zedz, what is about Baby that made you embrace it as your favorite sound comedy? My favorite comedy is Waiting for Guffman. I'll never forget watching Guffman with my family a few Thanksgivings ago and I was the only one who cracked up nonstop. They couldn't figure out what was so funny about this film. They took it as a tragedy.. a serious drama! Plus I could never get enough of Parker Posey.

Pedro didn't care for Philadelphia Story. He said unlike Baby, it felt musky old. He also claimed that every dialogue felt forced and cringed every time a character entered the scene in a too-perfect, too-obvious manner, providing an unfortunate stagey feeling to the film.

But at least we both went crazy over Now, Voyager that we saw last week for the first time - so breathtaking, flourishing that happens only in Hollywood. Beautiful music playing thorough. Bette's incredibly believable and soulful performance. An utterly magnificent romance complete with two good-byes at the airport and the train station! Thinking about starting a thread devoted to this film.

Do you like Philadelphia Story, zedz?

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

#35 Post by zedz » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:29 pm

Michael wrote: Well, my partner Pedro and I have opposite opinions of Philadelphia Story and Bringing Up Baby. He adored Baby, calling it a brilliantly energetic, exquisite masterpiece that holds up shockingly well today. I thought it was cute and silly. The film would be so blah without Kate and Cary whose chemistry together really made the film glitter.
Definitely silly, and definitely cute, but all of the performances are magnificent. Actually, I can't think of a great Hawks film in which the characterisations and performances are not the best thing on display - it's what turns Only Angels Have Wings from a formulaic drama into a masterpiece and saves To Have and Have Not from being a muddled, inconsequential mess. I love the fact that in this film the humour is rooted in (outrageous) character: Cary and Kate are hilarious caricatures in their own right (her 'hard boiled' act at the end of the film always has me laughing out loud), but sparking off one another those caricatures lift the film into a fourth dimension. Plus there are entirely different comic combustions when you bring in the supporting cast: Cary and Charlie Ruggles is an entirely different, but equally funny, kettle of fish, as is Cary and May Robson - and Kate and May - and Charlie and May - and Cary and Asta - and Kate and Asta. The film is so rich in different comic textures.

And that's just the character stuff! There's also priceless comic timing and physical humour (Cary's hat on Kate's arse), visual gags and surreal, time-twisting sui generis moments (Cary's explanation for his bizarre attire, or the great moment when, defeated, he makes the "waiting for a bus" comment).

As with a lot of my favourite films, there are less stellar bits that I happily overlook. The "with you in a minute, Mr Peabody" routine is overdone, and not that funny to begin with, but it's surrounded by great bits of business; the drunk gardener schtick was pretty stale even in the 30s; and the collapsing climax is a shade too silly even for me (but that's probably the price you pay for a spectacular punctuating visual).

And, tellingly, it's a film that, because so much of its humour is based in character and comic timing, remains funny on multiple viewings. I don't know if it's the funniest film I've ever seen (and I don't know if any film I've seen has the cumulative hilarity of, say, The Day Today), but it's my second favourite comedy behind the even-more-inexhaustible The General.
My favorite comedy is Waiting for Guffman. I'll never forget watching Guffman with my family a few Thanksgivings ago and I was the only one who cracked up nonstop. They couldn't figure out what was so funny about this film. They took it as a tragedy.. a serious drama! Plus I could never get enough of Parker Posey.
The Guest films are definitely high on my personal laughometer (if pushed, I might have to nominate Jennifer Coolidge's surreal turn in A Mighty Wind as the funniest screen performance I know - too dumb to hum!), but I'm less impressed with them as whole pieces of cinema (rather than strings of terrific improv), an impression probably exacerbated by them all following the same putting-on-a-show template.
Do you like Philadelphia Story, zedz?
Yes, but I'm definitely more into pure screwball from the period (e.g. His Girl Friday, The Awful Truth) - more anarchic and distinctive, with no socially redeeming features (PS still has the air of serious drama).

Further to Now, Voyager, I'd recommend Dark Victory if you haven't seen it. It's been years since I have, but it remains the most devastating 'weepie' I know.

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#36 Post by Michael » Mon Oct 16, 2006 10:44 pm

Further to Now, Voyager, I'd recommend Dark Victory if you haven't seen it. It's been years since I have, but it remains the most devastating 'weepie' I know.
We also recently watched another fantastic film Humoresque with Joan Crawford and John Garfield - many thanks to davidhare for recommending this film to me personally. Yhere's a very rich gay text begging to to be unearthed and explored in this film and also Now, Voyager. I hope there are fans of those two films on this forum.

User avatar
Michael
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:09 pm

#37 Post by Michael » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:09 pm

Since receiving and watching the DVD last week, every single day the film keeps calling me back to watch it again. I've seen it 5 times already and after each time, I return to everything I wrote about this film on this thread and every word keeps growing more embarrasing and comical. Every time I watch it, it keeps getting richer.

I really like this review from Slant

Post Reply